Rosco T.
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 10:04 PM
Original message |
This is serious question. Which Republican will you support in 2012 since... |
|
.. everyone has thrown Obama under the bus?
Yeah, he kept the middle-class's tax breaks and got another year of unemployment benefits..
..but so what, right?
If WE start beating on Obama, who in their right mind would vote for any Democrat in 2012, let alone Obama running.
So, if you're 'done' with Obama... which Republican do you want to see run? Cause we're gonna enable that if we keep going the way we're going.
|
Skittles
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 10:05 PM
Response to Original message |
1. gawd, not the "REPUKES WOULD BE WORSE" meme |
Rosco T.
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. Stop putting words in my mouth, not what I said... |
|
not what I meant, not what I implied.
It's a damn serious question based on what I've been seeing all day.
This attitude is killing the Democratic support in the country, so either we get it together or we figure out which Republican is the least dangerous.
|
Skittles
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. I would never, ever support a repuke |
|
Edited on Mon Dec-06-10 10:10 PM by Skittles
NEVER
and it's not "this attitude" that is killing Dem support in America - it's the ACTIONS and INACTIONS of the so-called Democrats in power
|
AsahinaKimi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
14. I'm with you Skittles.. |
|
Edited on Mon Dec-06-10 10:11 PM by AsahinaKimi
I would sooner do Seppuku then vote for a Republican.
|
nadinbrzezinski
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
15. Some folks just don't or cannot get it |
CakeGrrl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
|
outrage du jour on DU, or does it become action?
|
griffi94
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
13. the actions of the democrats, including obama |
|
are killing democratic support in the country.
|
Subdivisions
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
Edited on Mon Dec-06-10 10:14 PM by Subdivisions
We find another Democrat to challenge Obama! If we lose, the worst we get is Obama again. WE DON'T AUTOMATICALLY HOPE OR ROOT FOR A "GOOD" REPUBLICAN!!!
Jesus H. Christ!
|
iris27
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
51. "If we lose, the worst we get is Obama again." NOT true. |
|
May I offer my state's governorship as an example? From 2000-2004, we had Bob Holden, who was unpopular enough toward the end of his term that "One Term Bob" was becoming a catchphrase. Our now-senator, then-state-auditor Claire McCaskill primaried him, and beat him. And promptly got whomped in the general by Republican Matt Blunt, slasher of Medicaid and shredder of government documents.
A primary challenge to an incumbent, at this high level, is usually only benefical to the opposing party.
|
LoZoccolo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
54. So are you saying that they wouldn't be worse? n/t |
Subdivisions
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 10:06 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Same tired old argument. No imagination. |
|
Is the possibility of a primary challenge so out of the question?
|
Individualist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
Rosco T.
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
so use your own imagination.
Same to you... "Same old tired rebuttal to shut down a conversation, no imagination."
|
Subdivisions
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
11. My answer was that we don't by default root for a republican. We find someone |
|
Edited on Mon Dec-06-10 10:13 PM by Subdivisions
and we try to present Obama with a primary challenge. That way we can still vote for a Democrat, rather than sit out or vote for Obama again.
Geez.
BTW, your quote is not accurate. That's not what I said.
|
Whisp
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
41. Time's a ticking. Who? |
|
a serious name can't even be dreamed up but yet some mystery something or other democrat/green/pink/progressive/whatchamacallit is going to boot Obama out of office.
o dear gawd.
|
Subdivisions
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #41 |
48. You're right, the clock is ticking. Because I'm well aware that to build |
|
support for someone to challenge Obama is going to be tough and, if we're going to challenge him, we have to start soon.
As for whom, I don't know yet. I have ideas. Grayson. Weiner. Trumka (AFL-CIO President). Then we have to convince whoever to go for it, if they're so inclined.
|
meow mix
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 10:09 PM
Response to Original message |
7. apparently i supported one in 2008 |
|
wont make that mistake again
|
Jamastiene
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 10:09 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Do you guys just think repeating that meme one more time will be a charm? I mean, if it just annoyed people and pissed them off the first brazillion times, what makes you think it will do anything but annoy people and piss them off the brazillion and first time?
Geez, try to come up with something original. Or at least build a larger repertoire of memes, so these don't get so incredibly repetitive.
|
originalpckelly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 10:10 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Ask yourself one LITTLE QUESTION: |
|
Why now?
They knew about this tax cut problem for ten years, AND NOW they're doing something about it? What you don't see is how plain and clear it was. This was highway robbery. They held us up for these tax cuts. They threatened people on unemployment with no benefits extension to get them. This didn't all happen by chance. Or maybe it did, and it's damn peculiar how they just decided to attach it to the unemployment benefits extension.
|
LibraLiz1973
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 10:10 PM
Response to Original message |
10. This argument is ridiculous, and is basically how Republicans |
|
elected GWB for the 2nd time. If it's broke, fix it or get a new one. Sorry, but that is the way it is going to have to be. Obama is responsible for his behavior, and we are ALLOWED to be pissed. I am tired of the "if you don't agree you aren't a real Democrat" or "If you don't support him you are electing a Republican". Fuck that. Just fucking fuck that. We got sold a bill of goods, I don't think he deserves to be re-elected, and I am not ashamed to say it. It doesn't make me less of a democrat.
|
Webster Green
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 10:11 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Definitely the snowbilly. |
|
She will get us to rock bottom very quickly, then we can start the re-hab. }(
|
DisgustipatedinCA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
|
...as my wife pointed out, as soon as the snowbilly hits rock-bottom, she'll likely quit, and our rehab can start that much sooner.
|
laughingliberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 10:12 PM
Response to Original message |
16. No, this is not a serious question. It's serious flamebait. nt |
nadinbrzezinski
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 10:13 PM
Response to Original message |
17. So let me get this straight, the actions in DC have |
|
NOTHING to do with this. They are innocent like morning snow!
(yes mixing metaphors on purpose)
|
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 10:16 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
Subdivisions
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
|
"they have been against Obama since before he was elected"
I voted for Obama - TWICE! So don't give me your bullshit!
:mad:
|
FrenchieCat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
21. Are you a party of one? |
|
Edited on Mon Dec-06-10 10:21 PM by FrenchieCat
And since I'm not talking about you, stop screaming in my ear.
Folks who obviously care so much MORE about what the rich will or will not get for two years, OVER the unemployed who were schedule to receive NADA for Christmas
are in this thread.
so are those who have hated Obama all along.
If you are not one of them....then good for you. means you are sane.
|
Subdivisions
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
29. Another all caps cop... Let me tell you something right here and now... |
|
I'll use all caps whenever and wherever I want. I use them for emphasis and I do not play into that netiquette bullshit from 15 years ago. And another thing, when I use the H1 tags, THAT's when I'm screaming!
I worked phones. I walked the streets. Took loads of crap in this Red State Hell. I went to see Obama in person and I told him I trusted him and believed in him. And I voted for him TWICE!
And he BETRAYED my trust and faith at every major fucking turn! And the little bones he's tossed, though chewy, had very little meat on them. So I will say whatever the hell I want to say about him and I don't give a fuck who doesn't like it!
|
FrenchieCat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #29 |
|
He betrayed you, because what you wanted was not what he could do. He didn't betray the unemployed and the middle class, and they are more important than you.... and they should be more important to anyone that is a true liberal... not just those who play Liberal on these boards.
Are you worried about the Deficit due to the tax cut extension? Is that it?
|
Subdivisions
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #31 |
39. First of all, this debate (there was no debate) should have begun months ago. I |
|
Edited on Mon Dec-06-10 10:44 PM by Subdivisions
agree with Rep. Weiner who said that Obama should have took his ass on the road to R states and filled stadiums and put his case out there to try to bring some R's to his side.
(A serious question: With all the majorities we have, why haven't the Dems repealed the 60 vote majority?)
Of course I care about the unemployed. Like Weiner said, there should have been a FIGHT of some sort. But there was no fight! NONE! He rolled over like a broken-spirited dog!
Yes, I'm also concerned about the deficit because the deeper we get into debt, the less funds there are for a jobs program, a MASSIVE jobs program on par with FDR's New Deal, but this time not just for existing infrastructure upgrades and new infrastructure projects, but also massive alternative energy and transportation programs. Like Weiner said, the money from taxing the rich could have paid for jobs for those on unemployment and those jobs could have come from this new New Deal WPA.
As for how it would all come together, I don't know. But I know some fight would be required. BUT THERE WAS NO FIGHT! Because OUR PRESIDENT rolled over and gave the MINORITY party and their rich buddies more mansions, property, yachts, and golf vacations, as well as an ESTATE TAX BREAK (read that: ESTATE! Do you have a fucking ESTATE? I don't), and all we got is a few more months of UI, which Obama should have fought for with no compromise for the rich!
|
cherokeeprogressive
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
33. "You are asking the enemy a question here..." Just who the hell are you calling the enemy? |
|
So you're not above calling DUers the enemy if they haven't, to use your own words, "walked with obama" since the beginning, or stopped walking somewhere along the way?
You're calling DUers the enemy. You're a piece o' work.
|
FrenchieCat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #33 |
34. Takes one to know one. |
cherokeeprogressive
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #34 |
dana_b
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 10:20 PM
Response to Original message |
|
it can be any one of those idiots running. Obama SHOULD have no problem beating ANY of them. If he can't, well then maybe there is something wrong with him.
|
BzaDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
47. Or maybe there's something wrong with people who claim they are progressive, yet enable Republican |
|
victories in the voting booth?
|
dana_b
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-07-10 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #47 |
56. I don't claim, i know |
|
and so far I see very little that is "progressive" about this President or his administration. Speaking of "enabling' Repubs, we could all take a lesson on that from Obama.
|
hobbit709
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 10:21 PM
Response to Original message |
23. Any of the previously deceased ones. |
|
the longer the deceased the better.
|
lib2DaBone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 10:22 PM
Response to Original message |
24. Primary challenge... Grayson/Bernie Sanders.... |
|
Either we mount a primary challenge to Obama..or we start a 3rd party.
|
Monique1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #24 |
|
I'll repeat what I said before - it is depressing here - nothing positive no matter what.
|
The Gunslinger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 10:23 PM
Response to Original message |
25. I hope for a primary challenge |
|
Obama is doing quite well for the republicans. The health insurance industry has been empowered to an extreme degree. The rich got their bailout, and Social Security has begun to be eliminated.
|
Monique1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
|
also doing well for the republics
|
nadinbrzezinski
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #28 |
32. I am all for eliminating Social Security?????? |
|
who the fucking knew that? Jesus on a trailer hitch... you ARE funny my dear.
Apparently I am also against Unions, never mind hubby is a member of one... silly me.
Thanks for letting me know... phew, good thing I am registered Independent. I mean with those values...
:sarcasm:
|
mmonk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 10:24 PM
Response to Original message |
27. Isn't Obama running for re-election? |
Subdivisions
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #27 |
30. I hope not. The repukes don't have a single person that can win against |
|
a good alternative to Obama.
|
Whisp
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 10:34 PM
Response to Original message |
35. I want to know which Democrat can challenge Obama in 2012 |
|
never mind the Republican. Lots of screaming here about that utter unhelpful nonsense of replacing Obama.
but no real answers, just crickets and bleets of:
Dennis Kucinick!, Alan Grayson!, Howard Dean!. Has anyone actually contacted them or read anything about this grand idea DU has come up with? What say the fellas that are listed on this?
They should step up soon, time's a ticking.
:crazy:
|
BlueIris
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 10:35 PM
Response to Original message |
36. Even if the nastiest Republicans of all get in there after November of 2012, at least |
|
Edited on Mon Dec-06-10 10:36 PM by BlueIris
then the corruption will have Republicans' names next to it. I can live with that.
|
BzaDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #36 |
46. Will you tell that to the parents of soldiers that fight war number 3 and 4, that you enabled? n/t |
|
Edited on Mon Dec-06-10 10:54 PM by BzaDem
|
stranger81
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 10:42 PM
Response to Original message |
40. You've got this exactly backwards. |
|
It's not Obama that's been thrown under the bus. It's everyone who voted for him who has tire tracks on their back.
|
JoseGaspar
(391 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 10:45 PM
Response to Original message |
|
This guy would be OK: As would this guy: But, I really prefer one of these two:
|
Mimosa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 10:47 PM
Response to Original message |
43. Obama made DEALS with ReThugs: He threw us under the bus. |
|
Don't turn it around.
Who is getting beat up? Republicans or Democrats?
|
dflprincess
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 10:49 PM
Response to Original message |
44. I won't support a Republican |
|
no matter what letter s/he puts after their name.
|
Catherina
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 10:52 PM
Response to Original message |
45. Oh GAWD. Unrec and hide thread. n/t |
Iggo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #45 |
|
"If you don't like Obama I guess you love Republicans."
God, I'm so sick of this shit.
|
krabigirl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 11:27 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Mon Dec-06-10 11:27 PM by krabigirl
|
coalition_unwilling
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 11:53 PM
Response to Original message |
53. I'm a swing voter but I swing between Dem and Dem Socialist. (In California, that |
|
candidate typically runs on the "Peace and Freedom" ticket.)
So I will probly vote Dem Socialist in 2012, if I bother to vote at all.
|
Dappleganger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-07-10 12:01 AM
Response to Original message |
|
I'm gonna write his carcass in 2012.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:24 AM
Response to Original message |