Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I welcome their hatred...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 08:32 PM
Original message
I welcome their hatred...
FDR: "For these things, too, and for a multitude of others like them, we have only just begun to fight."

Our Documents: Franklin Roosevelt's Address Announcing the Second New Deal
October 31, 1936


Never before in all our history have these forces been so united against one candidate as they stand today. They are unanimous in their hate for me — and I welcome their hatred.

Those who used to have (access to the White House) are not happy. Some of them are desperate. Only desperate men with their backs to the wall would descend so far below the level of decent citizenship as to foster the current . . . campaign against America's working people.


http://docs.fdrlibrary.marist.edu/od2ndst.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Poboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Obama to left :"I welcome your hatred"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. sure he didn't say 'we must compromise'?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. he made many compromises
. . . of course, he didn't need 60 votes out of the 62 Democrats in the Senate at that time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lint Head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. FDR had courage. He fought for the underdog.
He would not allow the banks or the wealthy to roll over the majority of Americans as is being done with impunity now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtown1123 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. FDR was a leader. Obama, a compromiser. We were duped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neverforget Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. I wonder what FDR thinks about what's going on today.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. FDR actually fought for the people. And he began, contrary
to what Obama said recently, the moment he got to the WH.

And now we have members of FDR's party assisting in the dismantling of the New Deal.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Next up. Social Security!
Edited on Tue Dec-07-10 09:02 PM by RufusTFirefly
Keeping the tax cuts is going to do a number on the deficit, which in turn will put Social Security in the cross-hairs, even more so than it already is.

When they begin to dismantle it, they'll claim they had no choice.

And now -- in a sense -- they'll be right.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. No they won't be right. SS has nothing to do with the deficit.
Cutting it will do absolutely nothing to help reduce the deficit. It is an entirely separate fund. So when they tell people that they are blatantly lying, and I hope people will not fall for that lie.

Raising benefits for SS benificiaries would help the economy however, and the money is there to do it with. That money belongs to the American people, NOT the U.S. government and is not part of the Government's budget.

However, they have borrowed from it and want to keep borrowing, so they want that fund to grow. That is why they want to raise the retirement age and cut benefits. The fund has over a 2 trillion dollar surplus right now, doubling by 2023 even if we do nothing about it. It is that solvent! But it will have more if they cut benefits, and the war mongers can keep borrowing from it.

PLease do no fall for the lie that SS is in any way connected to the deficit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Believe it or not, I agree with you, sabrina
But the fear-mongering regarding SS is almost entirely based on lies. This should provide yet another opportunity for those who wish to dismantle it.

If I remember correctly, Dubya once offered up the California "energy crisis" as a reason why SS should be privatized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. he 'betrayed his class' and saved us. He was a four time
god and Obama will be a one time footnote in the failed presidents hall of infamy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Well, at least that's one thing they have in common.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. Hey kpete...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
9. He got Social Security passed, but it was flawed at its inception
Job categories that were not covered by the act included workers in agricultural labor, domestic service, government employees, and many teachers, nurses, hospital employees, librarians, and social workers.

The act also denied coverage to individuals who worked intermittently. These jobs were dominated by women and minorities. For example, women made up 90% of domestic labor in 1940 and two-thirds of all employed black women were in domestic service. Exclusions exempted nearly half the working population.

Nearly two-thirds of all African Americans in the labor force, 70 to 80% in some areas in the South, and just over half of all women employed were not covered by Social Security. At the time, the NAACP protested the Social Security Act, describing it as “a sieve with holes just big enough for the majority of Negroes to fall through.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Security_%28United_States%29
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
14. k&r for the Great FDR. n/t
-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
16. I've been thinking... since the Prez isn't strong enough to say those words, maybe forming a "I
Welcome Their Hatred Club", complete with buttons, writing LTTEs, collecting enough $$$ to place ads in newspapers, etc., would be in order.

I WELCOME THEIR HATRED



Wear it proudly.

PS... this is the closest I could find:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC