WCGreen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 01:52 AM
Original message |
President Obama does have sway over senators.... |
|
When it comes to appointments in a senators state, the president can ignore the incumbent's wishes...
|
CaliforniaPeggy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 01:55 AM
Response to Original message |
WCGreen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 02:10 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
5. Federal judges, commissioners and attorneys, mainly, but there are |
|
literally thousands of federal appointments
|
CaliforniaPeggy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 02:11 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
I was wondering why you mentioned this...
|
Me.
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 02:02 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Funny How He Never Used It On Ben Nelson |
ingac70
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 02:04 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Um, what appointments would those be? n/t |
WCGreen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 02:08 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
But there are all sorts of federal appointments such as various commissioners and federal attorneys.
|
ingac70
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 02:57 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
7. I don't think getting..... |
|
your buddy a job as a Federal Attorney is worth supporting this tax bullshit.
|
WCGreen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 03:01 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. No, but it could be used by the WH to persuade GOP senators |
|
that if they play ball with them on this he will consider their input when appointments come up...
He could use it but it looks like he hasn't, as if this tool is beneath him.
I brought it up as a way to reward our side or cajole a vote or two for our side.
I wasn't talking about this bill, I was referring to what he could have done to get the tax reinstated for the higher brackets.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:30 PM
Response to Original message |