By Brandon Keim December 7, 2010 | 3:35 pm | Categories: Government
Under the guise of keeping federal spending under control, Republican congressmen have launched yet another attack on the basic scientific research that could lead to useful, potentially job-creating discoveries.
House majority leader Eric Cantor (R-Virginia) announced last week that the YouCut Citizen Review, a crowdsourcing tool for identifying “wasteful spending that should be cut,” would make its very first target the National Science Foundation.
One would expect science-targeting politicians to have learned caution from Sarah Palin’s fruit-fly debacle, in which the 2008 vice presidential candidate mocked the methodology of research into neurological disorders like Down syndrome and autism, both of which afflict members of her family.
But in a video introduction to the YouCut review, Rep. Adrian Smith (R-Nebraska), a member of the House Committee on Science and Technology, pulls rank on peer review.
“Help us identify grants that are wasteful or that you don’t think are a good use of taxpayer dollars,” he asks, mentioning “university academics
received a $750,000 grant to develop computer models to analyze the on-field contributions of soccer players” and “scientists received $1.2 million to model the sound of objects breaking for use by the videogame and movie industry.”
more
http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2010/12/nsf-youcut-review/