Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Justice Dept. now can’t fill U.S. attorney spots.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 07:04 PM
Original message
Justice Dept. now can’t fill U.S. attorney spots.
Ain't karma a bitch!


http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/25/justice-dept-now-cant-fill-us-attorney-spots/

Justice Dept. now can’t fill U.S. attorney spots.

“The Bush administration’s decision to fire nine U.S. attorneys last year has created a new problem for the White House: The controversy appears to be discouraging applications for some of the 22 prosecutor posts that President Bush needs to fill.”

Of the nation’s 93 U.S. attorneys, 22 are serving without Senate confirmation as interim or acting prosecutors. They represent districts in Alaska, Arizona, California, the District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Michigan, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, Puerto Rico, Tennessee, West Virginia and Washington.

White House spokesman Tony Fratto said the administration is committed to nominating candidates for all 22 open positions, but so far the administration has submitted only four nominees.

In Florida, the panel that’s evaluating candidates and making recommendations to the White House has received only two applicants for the vacancy left by U.S. Attorney Paul Perez in Tampa - even after it extended the May 3 deadline to apply.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Gee, I wonder why? The prospect of working seven day weeks, long long hours,
and, at any given moment, having a cattle prod shoved up your ass, doesn't appeal???

Why, ah'm SHAWKED! Ah truly am!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. And imagine if an Abramoff connected Congressperson is in
your jurisdiction? And what if your area is targeted for caging or vote stealing? Man, they have so many problems that we should probably feel sorry for them. (with all due sarcasm)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. Too bad they actually need to get senate confirmation now, isn't it?
Such a painful dilemma. Hmm maybe they shouldn't have messed around with it all in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. And can you imagine the hellish grilling any nominee would get?
Anybody that * would be likely to nominate, the judiciary committee would be very glad to dress ... for roasting.

Politics, of course, would have no bearing on it. But the committee would make sure they were politically acceptable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. The Patriot Act provision is still law.
Edited on Fri May-25-07 09:35 PM by originalpckelly
At least as far as I can find.

It was cleared to the White House on 5/22/07. Bush hasn't signed it, if he vetoes it, that might be a signal of darker days to come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Ah, I remember now. I was amazed that Bush agreed he'd sign it
If he turns around and goes "Psyche!" and vetoes, it'll be a big shock on the Hill. Not saying he won't, but my recollection is that the WH officially stopped fighting the provision. For what that's worth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #2
15. I'm sure they're holding off for a slew of recess appointments.
That oughta hold 'em for awhile. Meanwhile, courts'll be packed with rubber-stamp Boltons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Once these freaks finally leave office, our government will be in ruins....
:hurts:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. What Clinton DIDN'T do to the White House upon leaving....
... is precisely what gw IS DOING to the entire government years before he leaves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
7. So I guess that Patriot Act provision worked pretty damn well didn't it?
Edited on Fri May-25-07 09:21 PM by originalpckelly
22? Wow! That's a lot!

They probably won't be confirmed for the duration of however long Bush thinks he can stay in office.

I doubt it's a lack of applicants, but rather a plan on the part of the Bush Administration to avoid confirmation hearings for their US Attorney spots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Remember: The Patriot Act provision is still law, the President hasn't signed...
the amendment to that law.

He has ten days from the 22nd of May to sign it or veto it, or it will automatically become law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-27-07 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. And, any appointments under that law are permanent, for all practical purposes
in that the "interim" provisions of the previous appointment process do not apply. This is why Griffin is still in!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
133724 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
11. Who wants to spend $100K on a law degree
and Bar exam; only to be disbarred by bushco....

Most attorneys I know make over $200K per year...

the numbers just do not add up....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
12. Decent, law-abiding officers of the court don't want to be connected
with these liars and thugs. They are better off working for the mafia than the Bush Admin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Decruiter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
13. Whoops! How did that happen? Job security? Morals? How about just
RULE OF LAW?

Rich, just rich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
14. Don't worry, Regents University is just days away from graduation
Then there'll be a huge new crop of super-qualified legal-eagles to eagerly take those spots!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC