Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democratic-led House votes to scrap Guantanamo closure and tie President's hands

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 09:03 PM
Original message
Democratic-led House votes to scrap Guantanamo closure and tie President's hands
The House of Representatives voted 212-206 for a catch-all spending Bill covering government expenses in the fiscal year that began October 1, a measure that included the restrictions affecting Guantanamo and its detainees.

The legislation prohibits President Barack Obama from spending any money to transfer prisoners to US soil or to acquire facilities to hold them on US soil.

It also explicitly bars the transfer of the confessed Al-Qaeda mastermind of the September 11 attacks Khalid Sheik Mohammed to the US mainland or US territories.

"None of the funds made available in this or any prior Act may be used to transfer, release, or assist in the transfer or release to or within the United States, its territories, or possessions Khalid Sheikh Mohammed or any other detainee'' held at Guantanamo Bay as of June 24, 2009, the Bill says.


read: http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/breaking-news/us-house-votes-to-scrap-guantanamo-closure/story-e6frf7jx-1225968209804
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well, if the President is going to alienate the Democrats in Congress with his snide remarks,
Edited on Wed Dec-08-10 09:06 PM by BrklynLiberal
I would hope that they would show him just how uncooperative they can be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. oh, man, that's such bullshit. They're there to do the right thing, not pout like children
And it was and is still their job to decouple the taxes or ensure the middle-class doesn't just lose ground for no reason other than their intransigence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. That's crap. They're adults and elected officials and they have
a responsibility to act like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. That is funny.
"The legislation prohibits President Barack Obama from spending any money to transfer prisoners to US soil or to acquire facilities to hold them on US soil."

You mean his friends won't get their pork for opening private prisons? What a shame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. you mean the ones who stepped up to accept responsibility for the prisoners?
At any rate, they aren't refusing to close the prison because of whatever you're alleging.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. Cowards. Congress doesn't want to take responsibility on this one. n/t
-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. they really hung the President out on this one
. . . voters should let them know how they feel about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 08:00 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Or they gave him the cover he specifically requested. Hard to know, really. n/t
-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC