Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lawrence O'Donnell is a pathetic egomaniac

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Ramulux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 10:18 PM
Original message
Lawrence O'Donnell is a pathetic egomaniac
His self-righteous rant against Alan Grayson was the most absurd thing I have seen on MSNBC in a long time. I am literally stunned, I am normally a fan of this guy but this was just pathetic. He was just so fucking rude to everybody and had such an obvious agenda and was not listening to a word that anyone was saying. Alan puts him in his place and then Arriana backs him up and Lawrence basically shuts the fuck up. This dude needs to chill out and stop pretending like the fact that he was a senate staffer somehow gives him some sort of inside knowledge that no one else gets. Alan Grayson is a fucking congressman, you are not privy to any inside information that he isn't you you clown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Towlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. It was unexpected and shocking, that's for sure!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. I just tweeted him about how the tax compromise actually raises taxes on the poor
Obama traded the Make Work Pay credits for the payroll tax bullshit and it will cost low income taxpayers an average of $400 to $800.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Which eliminates one of Laurance's major arguments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bryn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
18. How does this work? The figure?
so that I can share. How does the tax compromise raise taxes on the poor by between $400 and $800?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #18
26. Here's a link
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/12/deal-raises-taxes-poorest-earners/

Pres. Obama traded the Make Work Pay credit for the payroll tax cut. It works out to an increase on the lowest wage earners.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bryn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 11:54 PM
Original message
Thank you for the link. Amazing!
I am glad someone caught this dirty deal for the poorest workers. Wow! I have posted this on my facebook so more people will see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. An increase in the taxes now
and, eventually, a decrease in their Social Security benefits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texshelters Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
42. Right and what about
the deficit you feign to care about Mr. O'Donnell?

Peace,
Tex Shelters
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bryn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. I agree with you here
I wanted to see what Alan had to say, but Lawrence went too far and didn't let Alan speak much. That was awful. I am a fan of O'Donnell, but tonight I didn't like it. Doh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 06:47 AM
Response to Reply #3
37. He seemed obsessed.
I changed channels when he started laying into Grayson. There's a way to do what he was trying to do, and this wasn't it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texshelters Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #37
43. O'Donnell is holding onto a myth about Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. Where does he get the idea that income from capital gains is not longer income?
He should stop spouting GOP talking points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillwaiting Donating Member (591 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 07:21 AM
Response to Reply #4
38. But he says he's a socialist which means it must be so!!
Defenders of capital gains are often socialists aren't they??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. Its writing episodes for the West Wing that gives him the extreme knowledge. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. O'Donnell's rant was the rudest and crazy attack I've ever seen on
TV. I don't know what is going on but this stuff needs to stop.

(Tweety was almost as rude to the Senator from Ohio)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. trying....very hard....to make a name for himself
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. He was unprofessional and rude. If he keeps this up the name that
he makes for himself will be "crazy" Larry. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. He was unprofessional and rude. If he keeps this up the name that
he makes for himself will be "crazy" Larry. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. He was a COMPLETE ASS tonight! Talk about unprofessional. Grayson handled it well. -eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. Oh man, i'm going to have to check that out.
Edited on Wed Dec-08-10 10:29 PM by jefferson_dem
Lawrence is an arrogant schmuck, true. But he just may have a point this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
9. Tonight, he ought to be the subject of his Rewrite segment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nckjm Donating Member (66 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
13. It was absolutely stunning to watch
It was almost violent. I've seen Lawrence attack guests (several times) but tonight it was in a totally different league. I meant I thought he was going to jump through the camera and attack me...there was just such intense anger coming through. Just made me uncomfortable. Grayson handled it well...amazingly well. It took O'Donnell down several pegs in my book in terms of my respect for him. It was, IMO, just uncalled for. I would like to have seen Lawrence talk like that to Bernie Sanders! Also, he calmed it way down when he went from Alan to Arianna which made his attack on Alan seem all the more personal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southern_belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. he sure did!
i wrote to his show with my complaint. At this point, i could care less if i ever saw his show again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
14. Now he's snarling about Pelosi.
Edited on Wed Dec-08-10 10:45 PM by myrna minx
Wow. I guess O'Donnell's role is being the administration's propaganda arm, which makes sense, he's a total beltway crony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
16. why is anyone surprised?
he's admitted many times in the past that he's a socialist, and hates liberals. So why be surprised when he attacks Grayson, one of the more well-known liberals?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texshelters Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #16
44. I was surprised by the unprofessinoal nature of the attack
and the out of control nature. I wasn't surprise by the substance.

Peace,
Tex Shelters
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maraya1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
17. He had a really bad day and behaved horribly but that does not make
him a horrible person. I like LO. I remember him tearing up while he was a guest on KO. He is just passionate and occasionally looses it. So do I.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BzaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
19. I watched that segment. Good for Lawrence. Just because some people don't like hearing hard truths
Edited on Wed Dec-08-10 11:19 PM by BzaDem
doesn't mean they shouldn't be shouted from the rooftops.

Of all the income brackets, the one that gets hit most is the bottom most one. That never gets talked about by progressives who want to "fight," and I'm glad Lawrence is talking about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #19
40. I enjoyed it as well.
Jane Hamshire lost the last remaining shred of cred she had. I have no idea why she gets any air time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
21. Going to watch right now. If it is as bad as you are saying, I'll be back asking for Lawrence's
email.

I have Grayson's back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
22. I never saw the show, but judging from the reactions here
It sounds like OD is Tweety on steroids when it comes to consistent positions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
23. He pulled a tweety
He was very emotional and unprofessional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
24. He told Grayson to act like an adult!!!
I couldn't believe it.
And then I realized Grayson is acting like a spoiled little kid, throwing a tantrum.

Grayson won't be there in a month - so what the fuck does he care about the unemployed getting their benefits?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ramulux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. So Lawrence's little meltdown...
was perfectly professional, but Alan Grayson's calm reasonable reply was childish? Why are you so angry at Grayson for telling Lawrence that this whole deal is bullshit? It never had to be this way, but somehow we are now in a bizarro situation where Lawrence can go mental on Grayson for standing up for the unemployed and lower income people and its totally reasonable. Where do you get this crap about Grayson not caring about the unemployed? He has fought for them since day 1 and has been the loudest critic of republicans obstructionism on this issue, but when he says that this deal is a bad deal for everyone including the unemployed somehow that means he doesn't care about the unemployed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BzaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. Because a) the whole deal isn't bullshit, and b) Grayson was making false statements to back up his
Edited on Wed Dec-08-10 11:55 PM by BzaDem
opinion.

In reality, Lawrence was the one standing up for the unemployed and lower income people. Grayson is the one who wants to kill the deal that will prevent lower income families from losing thousands of dollars, and the unemployed from getting their benefits.

It really doesn't matter if he has been "fighting for them since day 1" if in the end he votes to screw them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #28
33. It was great tv, I'll give him that much.
Grayson is only 1 Representative out of 345.
He's out of a job on December 31st.

He had better start thinking of someone other than himself when it comes to paying the bills.
The people who have had their unemployment benefits run out have nowhere else to go, no one else to turn to.

Is Grayson going to be Grinch this year?

His "take it or leave it" attitude is exactly what has lead us to this point.
He is being a damn prima donna for the tv, standing up for his principles.
But guess what?
You can't pay for groceries with principles!
And after this month, Grayson's history, he's out of a job, he can't affect what they do in Congress any more than we can.

Congress is not just 1 person.
So, if Grayson doesn't want to help the unemployed get their benefits, that's up to him.
What's he going to do, say it's not his fault when their bills come due next month?

I don't think Grayson is married.
Let me tell ya, being married will teach you real damn fast on how to compromise.
Because you have to compromise to determine who is going to get 2/3rds of the blankets and the sheets!!

Working for the people in Congress is all about the art of compromise.
Not jumping up and down demanding you get your way all of the time.
Grayson is one hell of a Congressman.

But, he's a lousy statesman.
He should compromise for the benefit of the people he says he cares so much for.
He doesn't have to worry about his reputation as a "deficit cutter", nobody is going to hold this against him in 2 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lamp_shade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 04:46 AM
Response to Reply #24
36. He said exactly what I was thinking at the time. Lawrence disappoints me occasionally, but
not last night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
25. And another member of the purity brigade is shoved aside.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrMickeysMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
27. I missed it... hope it runs in political videos tomorrow...
I think it's getting more interesting by the hour, I do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
29. I like O'Donnel alot....
By the way, Grayson was wrong and Ezra Klein and the other experienced economist corrected Grayson. It was a good show tonight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
32. Arianna....
Did not back him up. As a matter of fact, Ezra Klein and the economist on the panel (who is anti wall street by the way) corrected Grayson and told him he is uninformed. Alot of liberals just can't admit that Obama did get alot in return on the tax cut deal... Every economist (even krugman) says that there are alot of good things that Obama got in return for tax cuts for the rich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillrockin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #32
34. That's a load of crap.
I saw the show. O'Donnell came off as churlish and obsessed with selling Obama's plan. If you are under the impression that the deal is anything other than total capitulation, *you* are the one that is uninformed. O'Donnell's a corporate hack, just like Tweety and Joe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texshelters Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #32
46. Sure, even jack got some beans for his cow
but that doesn't make it a good deal.

One simple example: the tax cut extension would be for two years and the unemployment extension would be for 13 months. How is that equal? That's not even including the BS "death tax" reduction.

Peace,
Tex Shelters
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Volaris Donating Member (479 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 01:29 AM
Response to Original message
35. Nope I'm not going to do it lol.....
I simply don't think I've been around here long enough (I.E., haven't earned the right yet)to set that kind of fire and incite that kind of rage. I will let this one go =)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
39. I thought he was excellent. He aptly demonstrated that Jane Hamshire pulls facts out of her ass.
She wasn't even aware that the senate had a vote on the Obama tax cuts for the middle class.

Go Larry!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ramulux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #39
45. LOL
Jane Hamsher wasn't on this show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texshelters Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #39
47. Hello?
This was about the "discussion" with Grayson, not O'Donnell in general. I usually like O'Donnell, but he came off as a raving lunatic here. Kind of like Limbaugh...

Peace,
Tex Shelters
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texshelters Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
41. Well put, KR and muchos Kudos
Lawrence O'Donnell was an asshole here. He didn't let Grayson answer, he ambushed him, and he got on his high horse before he even understood Grayson's point. He clearly dislikes Grayson and was looking for a way to ambush him. In the meantime, O'Donnell comes across as an asshole.

You are correct when you point out that O'Donnell had an agenda and wasn't going to let any guest interfere with it.

Peace,
Tex Shelters
http://texshelters.wordpress.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC