Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

At times I have mentioned where I grew up

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 10:27 PM
Original message
At times I have mentioned where I grew up
but here is one thing of the system back where I grew.

In theory, we had separation of powers. You know the usual, Executive, Legislative, and Judicial.

IN practice the executive told the legislature, ok the head of his party, what the agenda was and damn it it was passed. It didn't matter, hell or high water, the President wanted it, well it WAS done, period. Now SOTUs were eight to twelve hour affairs... but...

Now how this was done, this bill... reminds me of that. This secret dealing behind closed doors.

Oh and it goes without saying, it ain't the change we voted for... but it fits the view that this is an empire in decline and next I expect a Dedazo... where this guy will select his successor. No, it would not shock me...

Oh and for anybody who took civics, US Government, or US History, well this is not the way the system is supposed to work, but a dying empire will become very much so an oligarchy, where the President says JUMP and everybody asks how high?

Yep, vote rigging, interference, and Presidents telling the executive what they want done... this is damn too familiar...

Oh and it took decades and a lot of organization to change that dynamic... just about 70 years to be exact. So get ready for a long fight. On the plus side, this is an empire in decline so it will come crashing down sooner than 70 years, and all suddenly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
a la izquierda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. ahh, good ol' corrupt Mexico.
Which at least knows it's corrupt.

I'll be there in a few weeks. I can't wait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Of course, and we all know at 18
that it really did not matter who we voted for either.

Now since you do mexican history... want a good laugh?

Guess what the WIki Leaks revealed.... there is little cooperation in the war on drugs between the Army, the Navy, Federal Agents, State and local...

Mexican reaction to this grand "revelation" was MEH!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
a la izquierda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. well, duh...
of course there's no cooperation. calderon really screwed the pooch by unleashing his war against narcos. i don't care what anyone on this board says. he made the situation 100 times worse.

still, i love visiting, and mexico isn't as dangerous as some make it out to be. you just can't be a dumb yanqui.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 10:51 PM
Original message
Well there are some places that it is
the city south of me was really bad for a while. Not that I will go for other reasons.

Ciudad Juarez and some regions in the hinterlands near it... bad

Monterrey is getting bad, for kidnappings...

Now that is hardly the whole country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
a la izquierda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
9. exactly my point.
just like i wouldn't want to go walking around, say, parts of memphis or st. louis at night, i'm certainly not afraid to walk around the US in general.

monterrey is getting pretty bad. happily, guadalajara has stayed relatively safe. i was in queretaro in october. what a city!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Well there are some places that it is
the city south of me was really bad for a while. Not that I will go for other reasons.

Ciudad Juarez and some regions in the hinterlands near it... bad

Monterrey is getting bad, for kidnappings...

Now that is hardly the whole country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. "This secret dealing behind closed doors."
A member of Congress on Ed's tv show this afternoon pointed this out saying "It's just wrong" and "This is not how it's done".

His worried face and words showed not only concern but he was seemed baffled at the cloaked process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. The more I think about it the more it reminds off...
President Echeverria calling the Head of the Senate and the House before the SOTU to go over the agenda for the year.

It was on open secret.

Trust me, that is NOT a nice comparison.... At least Aleman had talks wiht far more people, even some in the opposition. For that matter De La Madrid did as well during the crisis of the 1980s and the great bail out (and austerity plan)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. P.S. You've been watching Lawrence O'D so you must have seen him interview Rep. Clyburn
Edited on Wed Dec-08-10 10:56 PM by eleny
He even talked about how overnight after a long conference call some things were slipped into the bill. He never had a clue but heard it was done by the Senate. He didn't mention who the Senators are.

This bill sounds more like a salad made by too many chefs.

And it sounds like the Mexican government's M.O. is a template. :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. There are MANY governments that could be the template
going all the way back to Imperial Rome.

I just happen to have a first hand experience of one that did business that way.

And for older people it is really disconcerting that El Presidente does not have that kind of a pull any more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC