Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Australia: WikiLeaks cables reveal ties between Rudd coup plotters and US embassy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 02:57 AM
Original message
Australia: WikiLeaks cables reveal ties between Rudd coup plotters and US embassy
The latest batch of the several hundred leaked US diplomatic cables concerning Australia... provide further extraordinary evidence of Washington’s direct involvement in the anti-democratic coup against former Prime Minister Kevin Rudd last June.

Key coup plotters in the Labor Party and trade unions — including senators Mark Arbib and David Feeney, and Australian Workers Union chief Paul Howes — secretly provided the US embassy with regular updates on internal government discussions and divisions within the leadership.

As early as June 2008, the American ambassador identified Julia Gillard as the “front-runner” to replace Rudd.

In October 2009, i.e., eight months before Gillard was installed in unprecedented circumstances, Mark Arbib informed American officials of emerging leadership tensions.

The Australian people, on the other hand, were kept entirely in the dark about any differences between the prime minister and his colleagues until after Rudd was ousted...

The cables make clear that Arbib and the other identified MPs function not simply as mere US “sources”, as characterised in the media today—but rather as agents. Within the Labor and trade unions apparatuses, these party members serve as conduits for Washington’s agenda. The embassy communications reveal the extent to which the US government determines Australian foreign policy and dictates who will hold senior government posts, including the office of prime minister.

A precise chronology of Washington’s sordid, behind-the-scenes manipulation of Australian political affairs, between the Labor Party’s election victory in November 2007 and Rudd’s axing in June 2010, is likely to emerge once WikiLeaks releases the full cache of relevant cables.

Already, however, it is now beyond dispute that Washington began cultivating Gillard at the same time as embassy officials were issuing damning assessments of Rudd, above all over his stance on Beijing.

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2010/dec2010/aust-d09.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 03:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. This stuff just keeps getting better and better. Rec'd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 03:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. 'They hate us for our freedom...' g.w. bush
Edited on Thu Dec-09-10 03:29 AM by madmax
Everyone hates us for our fucking meddling in every nations affairs and bullying them into submission or outright invasion as was the case in Iraq.

"A precise chronology of Washington’s sordid, behind-the-scenes manipulation of Australian political affairs, between the Labor Party’s election victory in November 2007 and Rudd’s axing in June 2010, is likely to emerge once WikiLeaks releases the full cache of relevant cables.

Already, however, it is now beyond dispute that Washington began cultivating Gillard at the same time as embassy officials were issuing damning assessments of Rudd, above all over his stance on Beijing."
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2010/dec2010/aust-d09.shtm...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 03:29 AM
Response to Original message
3. Jesus. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 03:33 AM
Response to Original message
4. K & R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 03:33 AM
Response to Original message
5. I don't know very much about Australia.
Could this bring down that government?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 03:43 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Causing it a bit of embarrassment apparently:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 03:51 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. People seemed upset enough before this last leak was posted
because of the government's failure to defend Assange. I saw a poll last night at a Melbourne paper that showed 87% of respondents believed the Assange arrest was political. It was just a net poll but, still.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Agenda
Methinks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Violet_Crumble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 07:53 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. What's bad is that the US knew of the plot months before the Australian public did...
That really says something, doesn't it? For me it makes the whole overthrow of Rudd just that bit more unpalatable and it really puts more of a nasty taint on Julia Gillard, who until the coup couldn't do a thing wrong as far as I was concerned...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. The bit about how she could be expected to vote could have been written
about most mainstream national Democrats in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 03:47 AM
Response to Original message
7. K & R nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 04:16 AM
Response to Original message
9. Oops
K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 04:21 AM
Response to Original message
10. Nothing to see here. Move along. Move along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 04:36 AM
Response to Original message
11. This looks like a repeat of the Poppy Bush coup that toppled PM Whitlam in'75.
A BFEE tradition continues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 02:06 AM
Response to Original message
15. Thanks for posting this, Hannah. Do you know if it's in any mainstream papers in Australia?
Edited on Fri Dec-10-10 02:14 AM by Turborama
Who would have thought that America would be involved in a coup in Australia? And for what purpose? Big coal and oil hating Rudd's stance on climate change?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alamuti Lotus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 02:12 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Not the first time Australia has had US gov't deciding it's leaders
The year of 1976 stands out for some reason, I shall have to consult Blum's book to be sure..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC