Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Average tax cut for the top 1%: $70,000 - More than 85% of American men make in 1 year.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 06:19 AM
Original message
Average tax cut for the top 1%: $70,000 - More than 85% of American men make in 1 year.
Edited on Thu Dec-09-10 06:28 AM by Hannah Bell
And more than about 60% of american families make in one year.

http://journals.democraticunderground.com/Hannah%20Bell/150

The tax package contains the following benefits to high earners & the super-rich, per the NYT:

- 1/4 of benefit goes to the top 1%

- Patch for Alternative Minimum Tax which is currently paid by 4 million payers with income in the "mid to high 6-figures." Without the patch about 20 million more would have been subject to it.

- Keeping top tax on dividend income & capital gains at 15% (currently taxed at 0%-5%-15%, scheduled to rise to 20% for capital gains & regular income tax rates for dividends)

- Keeping top rate on hedge fund/private equity income taxation at 15%

- Estates over $5 million taxed at 35% (v. 55% -- or this year, 0%)

- Keeping top marginal rates at 33 & 35% (v. 36 & 39.6%)

Under Mr. Obama’s failed proposal, which would have raised the rates on income over $250,000 for families and $200,000 for individuals, the taxpayers at the top 1 percent of the income scale — those with incomes above $564,000 — would have received an average tax break of $28,000.

Under the agreement reached with Republicans, the top 1 percent will receive breaks of about $70,000.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/08/us/politics/08impact.html?partner=rss&emc=rss


There's also this:

A 100% write off of all business investment over the next year, the vast bulk of which will go to investment that would have been made anyway, adding nothing to the economy.

(And worse, a significant percentage in investments that move jobs abroad, not build new plants at home).

http://www.ourfuture.org/blog-entry/2010124907/bad-deal-wrong-direction





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 06:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. "Hot Damn!" - RepubliCronies (R)
Edited on Thu Dec-09-10 06:26 AM by SpiralHawk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 06:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. "You'll take what we give and you better like it. Sneer." - RepubliCronies (R)
Edited on Thu Dec-09-10 06:29 AM by SpiralHawk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
a la izquierda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. that would pay nearly all of my student loans...
see, i'm liking my idea more and more. once i finish in may, i'm planning on writing a letter to obama and asking him to get the Department of Education off my back regarding my loans. he can ask his rich republican buddies for the amount. sounds good, right? because those rich idiots are supposed to create jobs, and if i can't get one, i should be entitled to something, i think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. k
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
exboyfil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
4. A management coworker of mine was complaining
that families making more than $250K are not rich (his family's combined income is probably in the $300K range). I told him that to the other 98% of the country they are rich. He did not believe me that $250K+ represented 2% of the families in the country so I showed him the census statistics.

Our family income is a 1/3 of his, and I think I need to pay more taxes for what we as a nation are spending - that or dramatically cut back on our spending. You can't have it both ways.

I am very disapointed by this deal from both sides. After 100 weeks of unemployment something else needs to be done. I am not being heartless, but realistically what is happening is individuals have shifted their lives to accomodate these payments. Some are taking over the childcare duties for the household. Others are working under the table. I would be in favor of some type of work - any type of work instead of just receiving checks - even if it is just 20 hours a week (leaving another 20 hour a week for job search activities). A place to start is to work at minimum wage+$2/hr for the amount you receive in benefits. The longer you go the closer these jobs move towards minimum wage. Anything to get individuals moving again.

As for the jobs to be done. I am open for suggestions. I personally would target imported goods. I got to think we could compete with effectively with zero cost labor. I don't want this to be a permanent situation,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
6. Thank you for taking care of the rich, Obama. -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
7. recommend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC