Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Separate And Unequal: How Abortion Bans Exacerbate Discrimination

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 03:32 PM
Original message
Separate And Unequal: How Abortion Bans Exacerbate Discrimination

Separate And Unequal: How Abortion Bans Exacerbate Discrimination

Excerpt ....

Arons writes that Rep. Hyde's reason for enacting his ban on federal funding for abortion care is not out of concern over taxpayer money for abortion. Hyde:

"admitted during debate of his proposal that he was targeting poor women because they were the only ones vulnerable enough for him to reach. “I certainly would like to prevent, if I could legally, anybody having an abortion, a rich woman, a middle-class woman, or a poor woman,” he said. “Unfortunately, the only vehicle available is the … Medicaid bill.”

Hyde (and presumably most anti-choice advocates) wished to ensure the end to legal abortion for all women in this country, and targeted low-income women and women of color because they were (are) perceived as easy prey, so to speak.



http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2010/12/06/draft-separate-unequal-report-abortion-bans-discrimination-fighting-back
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
texshelters Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Legal Abortion
is yet another weapon used against poor women. And the a-holes who think banning choice would make abortion go away are deluding themselves. Rich and middle class women would travel to have an abortion and the poor would be stuck with babies they can't afford or poor women would die and babies would be deformed because of the illogical rantings of fundementalists. And while we're at it, let's take about health care and Aid to Families so that the poor families can have more kids and not be able to feed them.

The fundies like Hyde don't care about people or babies, he cares about unwanted fetal cells.

Peace,
Tex Shelters
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustAnotherGen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. And yet at the same time
They would never support Birth Control On Demand for any woman or man who wants it, regardless of economic status, at the tax payers expense. *sigh*

He could reach EVERY woman - every single one of us - with birth control. After abstinence (ain't going to happen LOL) the second best way to prevent abortion from happening is affordable access to birth control - condoms, pills, depo, mirena, etc. etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC