Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DADT is up to the courts. I'm tired of being a second-class citizen.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 04:09 PM
Original message
DADT is up to the courts. I'm tired of being a second-class citizen.
Edited on Thu Dec-09-10 04:10 PM by Bluebear
Enough of you who shout us down with your "Congress has to be the one to repeal this!!!!1"

Enough. We will win in the courts if not Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. all I can do is kick this
:cry: :hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justiceischeap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. And once it's won in the courts, it will go into effect immediately
Unlike if it passes in Congress and they (military) get a year to enact it. I say the courts are a better route.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. But do we have the votes on the Supreme Court?
Doesn't it all boil down to that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
racaulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Only if the DOJ continues to appeal. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. Any hope of getting the DOJ NOT to appeal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. Disgusting. I will donate to whatever legal fund is established to fight this.
What cowards. Enough is enough.

:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. Will Obama now issue a stay on the discharges.
I know several on DU were claiming he would when it failed in Congress.

Of course, the same ones were also claiming it wouldn't fail in Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yup.
And a big "Screw You" to anyone who claims otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. The failure of Congress to pass this is disgusting.
I hope the courts will uphold the unconstitutionality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
7. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
8. This was all a pre-rehearsed charade with the outcome known before the cameras came on.
"We tried." That's what I've expected to hear and now we will hear it.

Just an orchestrated theater with the final act well-rehearsed.

They played everyone perfectly.

And now the curtain falls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 04:22 PM
Original message
No doubt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
21. We always hear "You need 60 votes", but really you just need One.
It's all planned out like crappy TV wrestling. First they decide if they want it to pass or fail. Then they get together and decide who can afford to vote no and yes and then make sure only those who personally benefit from their vote, vote that way. And presto, after the vote they can all have press conferences about how it went and cry big fat crocodile tears about how hard they worked.

Meh. I'm done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
23. Pentagon: Must wait for the survey! Congress: Sorry, we tried. Obama: Yes, we can!
Whatever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
9. Fucking A.
I think I have all of those jerks on ignore anyway by now. After the court declared it unconstitutional, that should have *ended it*.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
10. world view of U.S. as childish, dangerous, crazy ass bullies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
racaulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
12. Agreed.
Edited on Thu Dec-09-10 04:33 PM by racaulk
With the bitter partisanship in the Senate and with the 60-votes-for-cloture rule that the Repukes just LOVE to abuse, I don't see any legislative path to repealing DADT at any point in the foreseeable future. If it couldn't happen with the overwhelming Democratic majorities in the 111th Congress, combined with our Democratic President who I'm certain would sign a repeal bill, then how can that be a possible avenue for successful repeal? How much of a Democratic majority in the Senate would it take? 65 seats? 70? 80?

The last two years were our best chance of getting this done, but the can kept getting kicked because the Congress had "more important" things to do. The military effectively (with Obama's blessing) kicked the can into the lame duck session so they could do their pointless and expensive "study" that confirmed what anyone with common sense and critical thinking skills already knew. Now the can has been kicked for too long and the clock has simply run out, and the Democrats in their complicity are just as culpable as the Repukes.

Fuckers, every one of them. It's up to the courts now. The DOJ can no longer take the moral high ground in continuing to appeal Judge Phillips' ruling.

:argh:

K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
13. We would already have it if it wasn't for Genius blocking it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. True n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
15. Two Dems voted no to debates on the repeal
Brown of Mass. and Manchin of West Virginia. Yeah, and I got flamed when I had posted to DU that I was depressed having little choice but to vote for Manchin when I really wanted someone to vote FOR, not just the lesser of two evils. Maybe some of those folks who jumped on my ass about how I felt on election day will now find a freakin' clue how it feels to be a gay citizen in this country and have to vote for a Dem who hates your very being.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
racaulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Brown isn't a Dem.
But otherwise, yes, I'm right there with you. Trust me, as a citizen of Georgia and considering what passes for a Democrat in this state, I know ALL ABOUT voting for the lesser of two evils.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Sorry... just tired and my brain is fried right now
But yeah, like I said, it would be nice to have someone to vote FOR rather than just voting against the Republican. I'm just disgusted with it all.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrownPrinceBandar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Manchin is a shit AFAIC.........
You (as well as we all) deserve better than that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okieinpain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
18. oh you're not a second class citzen in my opinion you're just
dark green, now get in the back of the bus with the rest of us dark green people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 07:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC