Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WikiLeaks cables: Pfizer used dirty tricks to avoid clinical trial payout

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 05:19 PM
Original message
WikiLeaks cables: Pfizer used dirty tricks to avoid clinical trial payout
Edited on Thu Dec-09-10 05:47 PM by marmar
from the Guardian UK:



The world's biggest pharmaceutical company hired investigators to unearth evidence of corruption against the Nigerian attorney general in order to persuade him to drop legal action over a controversial drug trial involving children with meningitis, according to a leaked US embassy cable.

Pfizer was sued by the Nigerian state and federal authorities, who claimed that children were harmed by a new antibiotic, Trovan, during the trial, which took place in the middle of a meningitis epidemic of unprecedented scale in Kano in the north of Nigeria in 1996.

Last year, the company came to a tentative settlement with the Kano state government which was to cost it $75m.

But the cable suggests that the US drug giant did not want to pay out to settle the two cases – one civil and one criminal – brought by the Nigerian federal government. ............(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2010/dec/09/wikileaks-cables-pfizer-nigeria





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kept them coming.
Let the world see how the world actually is being run and how the few are shitting on the many.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R... Think about this. What does this say about the U.S. role in this?
Edited on Thu Dec-09-10 05:32 PM by drm604
Think about this. The Pfizer rep had no qualms about telling the U.S. officials about this basically criminal behavior. They apparently had no concerns that the U.S. would raise a stink about it.

Now think about it some more. Why bother telling U.S. officials about it? What did Pfizer have to gain by telling them about this? They must have felt that the U.S. could help them in some way in their dirty tricks. Why else talk about it? Would you brag about such behavior for no reason?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. Interesting speculation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. Kicked, recommended and apparently Assange has distanced Wikileaks
Edited on Thu Dec-09-10 05:26 PM by Uncle Joe


• It emerged that Julian Assange had been transferred to the segregation unit in Wandsworth prison and had distanced WikiLeaks from cyber attacks on MasterCard, Visa, PayPal and other organisations.



Thanks for the thread, marmar.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. what does 'distanced Wikileaks' mean?
Edited on Thu Dec-09-10 05:41 PM by Whisp
thanks

Is he saying that WikiLeaks had nothing to do with the hacking?
of course he would say that and of course they wouldn't directly be involved in that...


o well,
not really any news I guess
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. It's up to interpretation, the obvious one is having nothing to do with it, but there may be
another layer as well, for example not approving of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. K&R!
Expose them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. "The Constant Gardner" --
Great movie about just such shit. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
7. Who in Congress has major ties with Pfizer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. This guy -- but he's out of government now.
Edited on Thu Dec-09-10 05:40 PM by Octafish


Guy on the left -- and still on the dole, I understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Pfizer has retained some of the Washington’s best known lobbyists,
Edited on Thu Dec-09-10 05:45 PM by Hannah Bell
Pfizer has retained some of the Washington’s best known lobbyists, including former Reps. Bill Paxon (R-N.Y.) and Norman Lent (R-N.Y.) and former Sen. Dennis DeConcini (R-Ariz.). The company also retains Scott Hatch, son of Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), who authored the drug patent law that remains in effect today. Since 1997, Pfizer has reported nearly $20 million in lobbying expenditures, according to the Secretary of the Senate. (Pharmacia spent $13.4 million during the same period.)" <35>
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Pfizer_Inc#Lobbying



Senator Asks Pfizer About Harvard Payments
Source: NY Times

Senator Charles E. Grassley on Tuesday asked the drug maker Pfizer to provide details of its payments to at least 149 faculty members at Harvard Medical School.

The senator, who is investigating the drug industry’s influence on the practice of medicine, also asked for any Pfizer e-mail, faxes, letters or photos regarding Harvard medical students who have protested against drug company influence.

Mr. Grassley, in a letter to Pfizer, wrote that he was “greatly disturbed” to read a New York Times article Tuesday describing a Pfizer representative’s taking cell-phone photographs of the medical students last October at a campus demonstration against industry influence.

“I find this troubling as I have documented several instances where pharmaceutical companies have attempted to intimidate academic critics of drugs,” he wrote.


http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x3765977
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rockholm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Probably has an (R) in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
9. not secret information:
Nigeria
In May 2006, the Washington Post published a Nigerian government report that had remained unreleased for five years. In this report, a panel of Nigerian medical experts found that Pfizer violated international law. This stems from the company's alleged testing of an unapproved drug, an oral form of Trovafloxacin, on children with meningitis in Nigeria.

Pfizer replied to the report saying they conducted the trial with full knowledge of the Nigerian government.<23> These allegations have been the subject of litigation in both America and Nigeria. On June 5, 2007 the Nigerian government filed a civil lawsuit for $7 billion in damages against Pfizer, related to a study of an experimental meningitis treatment given to children. <24>. Two hundred children received Trovan in Kano, Nigeria, in 1996, the company said. The Nigerian government and Kano state government allege Pfizer gave the antibiotic to children without proper parental consent and that it disabled or killed some children. <25>

In July 2007, the Nigerian government filed criminal charges against Pfizer over the trials. <26>

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Pfizer_Inc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. You're missing the most important part.
Pfizer tried to blackmail Nigerian federal attorney general Michael Aondoakaa to try to get him to drop the federal cases. I don't see that in your Source Watch link and I haven't heard anything about it before.

Possibly even more disturbing, to me at least, Pfizer seemed to have no qualms about telling U.S. authorities that they were doing this. They apparently had reason to believe that the U.S. wouldn't have a problem with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonhomme Richard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
14. We are coming to find that the apple pie we have been eating is
rotten to the core.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
16. Corporations LIE?! NOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC