Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

David Brooks: ‘Majority Just Isn’t There’ For A Withdrawal From Iraq By April 2008

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 05:44 PM
Original message
David Brooks: ‘Majority Just Isn’t There’ For A Withdrawal From Iraq By April 2008
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/26/brooks-incoherent/

David Brooks: ‘Majority Just Isn’t There’ For A Withdrawal From Iraq By April 2008

Last night on PBS’s Newhour, New York Times columnist David Brooks argued that Congress acted “reasonably responsibly” in removing timelines from the Iraq supplemental.

Brooks incoherently argued, “The country wants to get out of Iraq, but they don’t want to get out precipitously. They want a managed withdrawal. The majority just isn’t there. So the majority in the Congress had to accede to those two realities.” Watch it at link~

It’s unclear what point Brooks is trying to make. He either doesn’t understand what the American public wants or he doesn’t understand the timetable legislation.

Brooks’ own paper conducted a poll recently that found “sixty-three percent say the United States should set a date for withdrawing troops from Iraq sometime in 2008.” The bill that the Senate and House passed with bipartisan majorities — and Bush vetoed on the fourth anniversary of Mission Accomplished — set a goal for the phased withdrawal to be completed by April 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Edgeoforever Donating Member (97 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hey, isn't this one of the "National leaders" AAR interviewed for the relaunch?
He must be right, AAR sez it so! :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SergeyDovlatov Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. ridiculous
Majority is enough to stop the war if there is a will to do so.
By simply not passing a funding bill, democrats can stop the war.

White house does not have an ability to raise funds to fund the war on its own. It needs congress to fund it and a simple majority is quite enough to not produce a funding bill.

I don't think that senate and congress democrats committed enough to do it. They talk the talk, but don't walk the walk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well! I guess that settles that.
After all, David Brooks is an expert on what the country really wants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rydz777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. Sure, a neocon really has insight into what the country thinks. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. Does anyone SERIOUSLY BELIEVE that the citizenry wouldn't be THANKFUL
if we upped and left Iraq TOMORROW??

Yeah, there's be some R-W bee-yotching and moaning, but EVERYTHING WOULD FADE in the face of our troops' coming HOME.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC