Proud2BAmurkin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-28-07 10:04 PM
Original message |
So Sheehan is attacking entire groups like "the anti-war left" because individuals attacked her? |
|
strange approach from a "peace" activist, grouping people together and then attacking them
|
Purveyor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-28-07 10:06 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Something stinks here. |
A-Schwarzenegger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-28-07 10:10 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Where/how did she "attack" the anti-war left? |
|
Edited on Mon May-28-07 10:10 PM by A-Schwarzenegger
Thanks in advance.
|
mmonk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-28-07 10:10 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Mon May-28-07 10:12 PM by mmonk
She's quitting as the face of the anti-war movement. She's attacked by dems as well.
|
Pastiche423
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-28-07 10:13 PM
Response to Original message |
UndertheOcean
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-28-07 10:15 PM
Response to Original message |
TwilightGardener
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-28-07 10:18 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Those who choose to make themselves leaders or public figures |
BuyingThyme
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-28-07 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. I've never known of a person with a thicker "skin." |
Big Pappa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-28-07 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
She had to know what she would face if she took on this cause.
|
aquart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-28-07 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
11. So she shouldn't have done it because she isn't clairvoyant? |
|
She shouldn't have done it because....she doesn't meet your exacting standards?
Well, how many of us do?
|
Big Pappa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-28-07 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
12. Boy you read into things alot. |
|
No where did I mention meeting my "standards". Of course it is late and maybe you just did not comprehend my post correctly.
|
A-Schwarzenegger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-28-07 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
10. Those who heckle from the back of the peanut gallery |
|
need to walk in somebody else's shoes a while.
|
nam78_two
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-28-07 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
TwilightGardener
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-28-07 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
15. If I'm the self-appointed leader of a famous movement, I wouldn't |
|
be so concerned with anonymous posters to blogs. I'd assume that was beneath me, shrug it off and move on, with the understanding AND ACCEPTANCE that not everyone is going to like you, agree with you, or support you--especially when you give a big thumbs-up while standing next to Hugo Chavez.
|
A-Schwarzenegger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-28-07 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
19. Youre the self-appointed leader of an anonymous wiener. |
|
If you were you, you wouldn't assume much is beneath you.
|
TwilightGardener
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-28-07 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
20. Upon re-reading my post, I did mix up my "me's" and you's", didn't I? |
|
I AM me, and there's a LOT that is beneath me, and I'm not even famous or important! Except to my weenie dog.
|
Yukari Yakumo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-29-07 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
25. Some of us already have, |
|
And some of us are tired of the unruly mob trying to dictate everything we can say and do.
|
bananas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-29-07 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
22. Only thick-skinned assholes deserve free speech? |
|
Victims of right-wing sociopaths should just shut the fuck up or they will be further victimized? Great attitude you got, weiner.
|
TwilightGardener
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-29-07 01:21 AM
Response to Reply #22 |
28. Who said anything about free speech? Where does that come into play here? |
zulchzulu
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-28-07 10:19 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Do you have a link or are you just ranting sans proof... |
|
I want to see who your sources are for your opinion.
Got link?
|
Selatius
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-28-07 11:07 PM
Response to Original message |
|
She's condemning the naysayers on here who called her--I dunno--an "attention whore"? She isn't condemning all of DU. The only thing she did say was she will cut ties to the Democratic Party.
|
NoPasaran
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-28-07 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
|
What "ties" did she have with the Democratic Party?
I guess she might be registered as a Democrat in California, but beyond that, what? Has she ever held any party office, been a Democratic candidate, campaigned for the Democratic Party? It seems to me that her only real "ties" were expecting that Democrats would magically end the war on her timetable and then making a noisy, public exit when her fantasies were not satisfied.
|
Selatius
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-29-07 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #16 |
27. I dunno what she has done for the Democratic Party aside asking voters to kick out Repubs, but... |
|
Edited on Tue May-29-07 01:26 AM by Selatius
at this point I doubt she will be supporting somebody simply because he or she is a Democrat and not a Repub. Probably the added requirement now being that they voted against the Iraq War supplemental and probably the original 2002 authorization for war.
|
movonne
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-28-07 11:34 PM
Response to Original message |
17. I am so tired of these attacks on Ciindy...another post I just read said |
|
it looks like a lot of trolls on here tonight...and guess they got kicked out of their freep site.
|
underseasurveyor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-28-07 11:42 PM
Response to Original message |
18. She's not super-human or perfect |
|
Edited on Mon May-28-07 11:57 PM by temperancedissent
Damn the poor woman is exhausted. Doesn't any one get a break any more? Even a small one:wtf:
edit: spelling
|
Erika
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-28-07 11:54 PM
Response to Original message |
21. Leave her alone. Enough is enough |
|
She's trying to change the world so kids deaths will no longer happen and you are reviling her?
|
Lord Helmet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-29-07 12:21 AM
Response to Original message |
23. I dunno, walking away seems more sincere than announcing it |
|
People are saying leave her alone but considering she posted this manifesto on line for the world to see, I think she actually wants a response (attention :shrug: )
|
Yukari Yakumo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-29-07 12:23 AM
Response to Original message |
24. She's never demonstated the basic concept of rationality |
|
Edited on Tue May-29-07 12:24 AM by Aya Reiko
With her, it's always her way or no way. We get enough of that from Bush, we don't need any of that on this side of the issue.
But her excuse for leaving the cause presents a complete and utter logic failure.
Ever since she started her original vigil, the pro-war side almost certainly has been calling her things far, far worse than "attention whore".
Now when a very, very tiny fraction on her own side start questioning her motives, she quits in less than a week.
So explain to me how her decision makes sense here?
|
Ken Burch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-29-07 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #24 |
26. What is there in her MOTIVES to question? |
|
Her motive is, and has always been, to stop the war. What the hell do you THINK is her motive?
And by the way, viciously insulting someone while hiding behind the disguise of an anime character ain't exactly gonna earn you a chapter in Profiles in Courage.
|
me b zola
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-29-07 01:30 AM
Response to Original message |
29. So now you are spamming us with your faux outrage? |
|
Give me a break. Your misrepresentation of what Cindy said is a strange approach from someone on a progressive message board.
|
sanskritwarrior
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-29-07 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #29 |
30. I thought it was a democratic message board |
|
some of us are moderates, a few of us are even Conservative democrats.....Cindy said some things that were not very supportive of the Democratic Party.......Some of us are tired of this groupthink that if we aren't with Cindy we are with the rightwing terrorists......... I don't like Cindy Sheehan, her son's death is a tragedy and I have no idea what she has gone through, nor will I ever understand it. That being said, her grandstanding and "attention whore-ness" has always rankled me. My opinion about Cindy Sheehan does nothing to make me have any less passion towards removing the asshole at 1600 Pennsylvania and making our country great again.......But of course to the "lock step smothering of dissent squad" I have just committed a heresy.......
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:17 PM
Response to Original message |