Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fitzgerald Again Points to Cheney

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-29-07 03:39 PM
Original message
Fitzgerald Again Points to Cheney
Edited on Tue May-29-07 03:52 PM by kpete
Fitzgerald Again Points to Cheney

In Friday's eminently readable court filing, Fitzgerald quotes the Libby defense calling his prosecution "unwarranted, unjust, and motivated by politics." In responding to that charge, the special counsel evidently felt obliged to put Libby's crime in context. And that context is Dick Cheney.

Libby's lies, Fitzgerald wrote, "made impossible an accurate evaluation of the role that Mr. Libby and those with whom he worked played in the disclosure of information regarding Ms. Wilson's CIA employment and about the motivations for their actions."

...

The investigation, Fitzgerald writes, "was necessary to determine whether there was concerted action by any combination of the officials known to have disclosed the information about Ms. Plame to the media as anonymous sources, and also whether any of those who were involved acted at the direction of others. This was particularly important in light of Mr. Libby's statement to the FBI that he may have discussed Ms. Wilson's employment with reporters at the specific direction of the Vice President."

Not clear on the concept yet? Fitzgerald adds: "To accept the argument that Mr. Libby's prosecution is the inappropriate product of an investigation that should have been closed at an early stage, one must accept the proposition that the investigation should have been closed after at least three high-ranking government officials were identified as having disclosed to reporters classified information about covert agent Valerie Wilson, where the account of one of them was directly contradicted by other witnesses, where there was reason to believe that some of the relevant activity may have been coordinated, and where there was an indication from Mr. Libby himself that his disclosures to the press may have been personally sanctioned by the Vice President."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/blog/2007/05/29/BL2007052901024.html?hpid=topnews

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-29-07 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's not important to DU today unless it's "Fitzgerald Again Points to Cindy"
... which invites the local brainless horde of forum locusts to feed on the grain of gossip and personality assassination.

:puke:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-29-07 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Okay so who is mentioning Cindy again????
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-29-07 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Uhmmm ... that'd be you.
Edited on Tue May-29-07 04:07 PM by TahitiNut
:rofl:

My reply to the OP was nothing more than a 'kick' to a rapidly sinking thread. (I thought that was obvious.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-29-07 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. That's just what I was thinking.
Hold the Tahiti? :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-29-07 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. nicely put.....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-29-07 04:01 PM
Original message
!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-29-07 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Well, it's important to me...
ANYTHING that brings us even a tiny step closer to nailing that bastard cheney is important to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-29-07 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. and, if we believe him, also personally sanctioned by the President.
What did Bush think he was declassifying, anyway? That question was never adqeuately addressed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-29-07 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. is libby going to sing if he get 3 years?
a whole lot has changed since the trial was over. is libby and more important his wife going to let him fall on the sword and keep his mouth shut and do at least 2 years? did libby get an assurance from bush that he`d pardon him? it`s going to get real interesting in the next few weeks

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Annces Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-29-07 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
8. He knows who the scoundrel is
but he has to keep repeating himself. I bet he wishes he were over and done with this case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-29-07 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
9. I recommend reading the sentencing filing
Edited on Tue May-29-07 04:30 PM by JulieRB
Let's just say that I think Patrick Fitzgerald must have enjoyed writing it. http://media.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/documents/Libby_Sentencing_memo052507.pdf

Julie
still president for life of the PFEB; let's see if Scooter's willing to throw his life away for the Executive Branch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-29-07 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Sad to say, he will throw his life
away to protect his "Godfather."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-29-07 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. It was a thing of beauty
And I want to see those sealed bits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-29-07 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
12. Good reading. I look forward to other "Gates" reaching sentencing stage. K&R
Thank kpete. May this float.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-29-07 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
14. I completely agree with Froomkin here:
"(The defense's decision not to call Cheney to the stand remains a massive bummer.)"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-29-07 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
15. I think Fitzgerald is finally able to "wash the sand from his eyes"
in reference to his statement when Libby was first indicted....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejbr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-30-07 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
16. whateverthefuck...
people just fold when up against these nefarious bastards. All bark, no bite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 03:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC