Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Venezuelan discontent over power cuts

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » Latin America Donate to DU
 
steven johnson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 12:16 AM
Original message
Venezuelan discontent over power cuts
Edited on Fri Dec-25-09 12:20 AM by steven johnson
Source: UPI

CARACAS, Venezuela, Dec. 24 (UPI) -- Public discontent over renewed disruptions in electricity supplies reached new levels as the government of President Hugo Chavez announced further cutbacks in business and domestic use of power.

Officials said the cutbacks are a direct result of low water levels in the Guri hydroelectric dam, one of the largest in the world, astride the Caroni River in Bolivar state. In normal conditions the dam generates enough power to meet the needs of most of Venezuela, but persistent drought has forced the shutdown of parts of the complex.

Critics of Chavez within and outside the political opposition blame government mismanagement of the resource for the current crisis, which began intermittently earlier this year.

Chavez has accused business and industry managers of wasting electricity and warned factory owners of hefty fines for careless use of electricity supplies. But electricity cuts have become endemic and have impacted on economy and lifestyles, as shutdowns play havoc with refrigeration and other critical business and domestic uses of power.


Read more: http://www.upi.com/Top_News/Special/2009/12/24/Venezuelan-discontent-over-power-cuts/UPI-51591261699278/



Looks like the predicted political instability from climate change is taking it's toll.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=115x223589
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. Are they rationing toilet paper yet?
Whatever happened to the Soviet Union, anyway?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downwinder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. They still have roofs over their heads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 02:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. How you ever been through a drought?
Living in California and several droughts, I have. They don't involve rationing toilet paper but toilet flushing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kalun D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 03:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Trying to Equate
Trying to equate socialism with communism is a trick from the right wingers and corporate dems.

Don't fall for what the TV (sheeple indoctrination tool) tells you. Chavez is socialist not communist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pattmarty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. So is Bernie Sanders (a true American hero)!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
23. He's a socialist when it suits him.
When he doesn't get his way, he turns to fascism.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Nope. Unlike ours, his government does not collude with multinationals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Braulio Donating Member (860 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Chavez doesn't collude with multinationals?
Seems to me he does. Lots of contracts are being issued without bids to "friendly companies from friendly nations". For example a huge oil field known as Junin 6 has been awarded to a Russian consortium without having the appropriate tender and receiving sealed bids, as would be customary in a better run system. The Russian companies making up the consortium include several multinationals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. You gotta link? TIA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Braulio Donating Member (860 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #32
36. The no-bid deal between Russian multinationals and PDVSA
Here's a brief article,

http://www.cnbc.com/id/32431058

but if you search using Google and the key words "Junin 6 Russian Consortium" you can find a lot of reading material. Here's a synopsis:

Venezuela has an oil basin or field known as the Faja del Orinoco. The oil is very low quality, almost like asphalt, but it can be produced and processed into synthetic oil. The government has four joint ventures in the area, plus some other areas PDVSA operates by itself. The government divided the undeveloped areas into large parcels, each containing more of this low quality oil than the largest US field (Prudhoe Bay in Alaska). The parcels have been asigned to companies without bids, to help PDVSA understand how much oil there really is in each parcel. These studies don't mean much, and don't give rights to the companies carrying out the studies to produce the oil. Most of the studies are complete, and many companies walked away, or went "sleeper status" because taxes are too high and PDVSA is too erratic.

However, on top of these study agreements, the government signed agreements to hand over parcels to some selected players. The key parcel is Junin 6, which has a lot of oil. It was assigned to the Russian consortium, which includes several Russian multinationals (privately owned) plus two Russian government owned companies (Rosneft and Gazprom), and a joint Russian-British multinational (the British shares are owned by British Petroleum).

The government has also given away deals to other players, such as the Chinese (that would be a government owned corporation), and the Belarussians (not known for their oil production skills, but they do have a quality communist dictator, Lukashenko). They made a preliminary deal with Petrobras (government and privately owned), but Petrobras walked from the deal because they discovered huge oil reserves offshore Brazil, and of course they'd rather develop their own oil.

The Venezuelan government has also made government to government deals with Brazil in particular, which Lula's government then flips to privately owned Brazilian companies such as Odebretch. These deals have been incredibly profitable for these Brazilian multinationals, and are the reason why the Brazilian upper classes are so happy with Lula's foreign policy, he works hard for their cause, and they are growing fast. The Venezuelans, on the other hand, seem to be shooting themselves in the foot. Besides Brazil, they seem to do a lot of deals with the Chinese, which import Chinese labour to do a lot of the work Venezuelans could do.

The government seems to be focused on killing off private industry and commerce in Venezuela, so they can install a socialist-communist system. This of course means there's significant upper and middle class flight, and money is flowing out as they abandon Venezuela and move to the US, Colombia, and more friendly venues. Long term, coupling the communist line with the absurd exchange rate, the lousy planning, corruption and very high crime rate, Venezuela is becoming one of the lowest rated places to do business.

Given the poor performance anticipated for the growing state sector (which is being made into a copy of the Cuban or Soviet systems), Venezuelan bonds are considered a very high risk vehicle, which means the money the government is borrowing to cover its deficit are paying very high interest rates. I believe they should be considered junk bonds, as the default risk is very high.

The broad picture is one of mismanagement, corruption, and a "revolution" moving the country towards a form of national socialism with a militarist flavour. The President, Chavez, spends time talking up war, and making alliances with some of the most repressive regimes around, such as Iran, Zimbabwe, Lybia, Cuba, and their ilk.

What is really hard to understand is why so many "progressives" in the US support what we see emerging in Venezuela today. It's not as bad as the Soviet Union, yet, but it does seem to be headed that way. And the only force which will be able to stop it, really, will be the decent Venezuelans who work within the government - because the opposition does look poorly organized, is led by too many has been political hacks, and is too tied to the old regimes which also raped and pillaged the country. It's typical Latin American politics, with the people stuck between the frying pan and the fire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Braulio Donating Member (860 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
27. Chavez does sound communist
Chavez and his followers sound more like communists by the day. He does admire Fidel Castro, and recently seemed to speak well of Idi Amin. Also pals around with Lukashenko and Mugabe. However, he does have a militarist streak, and his government is well known for its corruption and favoring certain noveau rich known as "boligarchs", who are enriching themselves via contacts with government officials. I guess you could say it's complicated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kalun D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 02:08 AM
Response to Original message
3. As The Corp WHORE Media
ramps up it's attack on Chavez, "justification" so the MIMC can go in there and liberate (steal) the oil back from the working people of Venezuela

If Obama attacks Venezuela he goes down in history as just another corrupt corporate warmonger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chulanowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 03:13 AM
Response to Original message
5. Critics are blaming Chavez
Because Hugo motherfucking Chavez controls the weather?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 04:36 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Exactly.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chulanowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 06:14 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Ah hell...
Here here I thought it was Pudge the Fish all along...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xNj1XTnXc_M
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 06:44 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. lol
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. Never miss a trick, do they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
24. Come on now. That's politics for you. The guy in charge always gets blamed...
whether it's his fault or not. It just comes with the territory. That certainly is not unique to Venezuela, and it's a tactic used by both the left and the right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #5
34. Seems to me
that since they have a fairly centrally planned economy they could have forseen that the weather was unpredictable and planned for it.

Now, is there some realistic way they could have of generating power other than water? Something maybe that they have in abundance and could be stored in tanks or drums and used in increasing amounts to account for loss of hydro power?

Hmm. Nothing comes to mind. Venezuela has no other energy reserves. Nevermind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chulanowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. Ah yes, of course
Why didn't I think to consult a red-baiting piece of shit before? Thank you JonQ!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. Heh
nothing makes people as mad as when you point out flaws in saint hugo.

Yeah, there is no way he could have predicted that rain is not constant, and no alternative energy source available.

I guess as long as you say the occasional fuck you to uncle sam you will always have a rabid group of supporters on here (a small minority though) that will excuse anything you do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polly7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #38
44. It's got nothing to do with a 'fuck you to Uncle Sam'
Edited on Sat Dec-26-09 06:40 PM by polly7
What's this victim thing when it comes to any leader operating in ways the U.S. or other capitalistic based countries don't? Chavez has his faults, trying to do the best he can for his PEOPLE isn't one of them. I get sick of being called an apologist. Maybe you're projecting. Try learning exactly how far he's actually brought his people from despair, poverty and illiteracy with the resources they rightfully own and have given him trust to manage. Big fucking whoo ....... a nation that controls its own destiny, without the 'help' of anyone. No wonder that's hated ..... it's a BIG NO NO. Now ..... if they were a nation with no resources, he wouldn't even be on the radar. If he's such a piece of scum and such a pox on 'Uncle Sam', boycott his cheap heating oil, boycott all his oil. Start a movement.

Edited for the spelling police.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. Nah pretty much that's it
tell the US where to stick it (particularly under bush) and so called liberals will flock to your banner and defend very un-progressive behavior.

Take control of the media, arrest political opponents, rewrite the laws so you can stay in power, no problem so long as you throw out the occasional "america is the great satan" speeches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polly7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. Nah ........ that's not it at all.
Control your own country, use your resources to the betterment of your own people, develop social programs the 'haves' scoff at and you're pretty much a scumsucking enemy of the empire.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. I see you've already had the koolaid
and drank hearty.

Well no matter, you're in good company.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polly7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #48
50. Your kool-aid thing got old years ago.
Does it hurt knowing not everyone believes the propaganda surrounding Chavez' every move? Big, bad old boogeyman Chavez. Would you know his name if his country didn't have vast resources of the world's oil???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #50
55. Oh yes
do avoid the "propaganda" put out by all other media outlets.

Only believe the truth, coming from those media outlets owned by Mr. Chavez.

Everyone lies, but saint hugo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Braulio Donating Member (860 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #44
56. Reality check
Chavez does have a lot of faults. Doing his best isn't good enough if he's driving them backwards, which seems to be the case. So maybe it's time for a little change, and he can let somebody else try being president? He has been at it for 10 years, and his management style and performance aren't up to par. Even worse, he surrounds himself with some of the dumbest people on earth, when it comes to economic management, they're bums.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Braulio Donating Member (860 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #5
37. Because the government neglected to prepare for drought
Drought periods are known to return on a regular basis, government agencies in Venezuela KNEW this problem would take place, and plans were made a long time ago to build power plants and improve the distribution system (Chavez has been in power for 10 years, and these plans were made both before and after he took over). The problem arises because the Chavez government failed to make sure the infrastructure was built or improved AS PLANNED BY HIS OWN GOVERNMENT. The people know this is the case, and they're upset - a lot of the money was wasted, given away to other countries, used to subsidize the Cuban economy, buying weapons from Russia, and otherwise squandered. Now they're in trouble, and the power cuts are helping bring down an economy already weakened by low oil prices, price controls, and exchange rate controls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
40. Post 37 nailed most of it.
But there's more.

Pakistan has rolling power cuts for two reasons. The first is as in Venezuela--not as much rain as usual, they had to cut back on hydroelectric production; this got mixed up in making sure there was enough water for irrigation (farmers lost).

The second is that the economy grew and living standards increased, and so the country needed more electricity. Keeping the levels they had in good times 10 years ago would have led to rolling blackouts and brownouts now. Musharraf didn't focus on power station building. Nor did he focus on conservation.

So, no Chavez doesn't control the weather. He didn't plan for likely weather patterns, and he also did not plan for increased consumption. Instead he has his one-size-fits-all response: Whatever the problem, it's the enemies of his supporters out to undermine him and, vicariously, to hurt his supporters (or the other way around, good vozhdi like Chavez manage to viscerally connect with enough supporters that the political is intensely personal, so to insult your leader is like insulting your mother).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 04:33 AM
Response to Original message
7. The same thing would be happening if Venezuela had a "free market" system
Look at what Enron did in California(a program of deliberate random power cuts that should probably be regarded as a destabilization campaign against a sitting Democratic governor, an effort that succeeded as we all know).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Braulio Donating Member (860 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
29. Not the same as California
Sorry bud, but it's not the same thing as California. Venezuela is having a power shortage because the government has planned very poorly, and executed even worse. The drought was taken into account when they laid out plans several years ago, to build new power plants. They failed to build the plants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #29
49. How is that different from California?
Had they not planned poorly and executed even worse?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 05:00 AM
Response to Original message
9. And here in Los Angeles, we are permitted to water our lawns
only twice a week and then only for a specific number of minutes.

You can blame economic failures on the economic policies of the government.

But you really can't blame the weather on the policies of the government.

By the way, we also have a terrible water shortage in the Central Valley of California. That's the part of California where a lot of America's food is usually grown.

Droughts affect everyone. Government land-use policy can cause or worsen them. But basically, no government can increase or decrease rainfall.

I'm not a Chavez fan, but this is not his fault.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mudoria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
12. Hugo probably needs to stick to speeches
and let someone else with a little brainpower run the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. A rainmaker?
lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
15. K&R #7 for, La-la-la-la-LAH !1 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dave From Canada Donating Member (932 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
16. "In normal conditions the dam generates enough power to meet the needs of most of Venezuela"
So most, but not all, even in normal conditions. Perhaps they should look into additional power sources.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. like nuclear?
Could you imagine the reaction if Chavez started a civilian nuclear power program?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #19
46. You're late to the party...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #16
25. Uh, maybe they have other power sources for the rest of the country?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
18. But still they offered to help us during Katrina and POS Bush refused them and other países.
Why in living fuck don't we hear about that? Who gave Bush the right to allow only his conglomerate friends to rape our treasury after Katrina when other countries offered to do it for free?

But yes let's focus on some natural event and blame Chávez. Say what has Obama/Bush done about the lowering of the water tables across the heartland of America? Or about the moon drifting away at two inches per year?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Braulio Donating Member (860 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #18
30. It's mostly posturing
It's mostly posturing when Chavez "offers aid" to other nations. he does it precisely so people like you can say he did offer it. Meanwhile the Venezuelan economy is turning into a real mess, and poor Venezuelans are having a very hard time getting proper medical attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DumpDavisHogg Donating Member (255 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
20. UPI is owned by Sun Myung Moon
I don't trust a word it says.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flaneur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
21. Sounds like Venezuela needs to beef up its electric infrastructure.
No matter who is in power there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Most logical response of the lot. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Braulio Donating Member (860 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #21
31. Indeed
Venezuela does need to beef up its power infrastructure. The plans they have laid out include construction of new power plants, but the country also needs a better distribution system, because the hydropower plants which generate the bulk of the electricity are far from population centers. Unfortunately for Venezuelans, the government nationalized many private electricity generating companies, failed to build new plants and has neglected to maintain and expand the distribution network.

Even worse, emergency measures they are taking now are STILL neglecting the power distribution network, and include construction of large power plants AWAY from population centers, so the new plants will have to send their electricity through the same bottlenecked system.

Venezuela today seems to be run by political hacks who tend to be communists and/or corrupt opportunists, and the system is breaking down in several areas, of which power is just one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #21
39. The administration created a new ministry in October to address
increased demand by increasing production and trying to lower demand through ed. It looks like demand almost doubled in the boom years and the system couldn't keep up with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. So this is what you're saying.
We're pretty confident that this problem was predictable, in broad outlines, a and moew decade ago. So that plans were made. The drought's been going on for many months now, and the problems really started in what--September and October?

We're also pretty confident that everybody knew that consumption would increase--it takes a lot for it to actually decrease. And this would have been obvious to electric company planners a long time ago. You don't tend to build this kind of infrastructure overnight, esp. not if you're a private company and need permits and such.

And we're also pretty confident that Chavez had increased consumption in mind from the get-go. I'm guessing most consumption increases occur not when the middle class gets a new gadget but when working-class and lower-class folk can start buying more gear. So we can say that this was to be assumed a decade ago.

So I'm glad to see that Chavez placed the proper priority on electrical infrastructure and capacity development. It shows that he's a great leader, able to prioritize for the well-being of his citizenry, looking far ahead of their short-term needs in order to avert predictable problems.

Well, at least he decided to have always had taken the long-view months after the drought started. And in response to rolling blackouts. Come to think of it, he took action when it became a political problem, something that he could blame on others and so deny responsibility for creating, while charging to the rescue and take all responsibility for fixing. Esp. when the rains return.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. Not really, I don't know enough about this situation
to say anything of the sort but posted the information that I do have. How's that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Braulio Donating Member (860 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #42
51. "Chavez" didn't place priority on power generation infrastructure
I guess you read what you want to read from a message? The planners in the Energy ministry were aware demand would grow, droughts happen, and power plant equipment breaks down. In Venezuela, there WERE private electricity generators, but they could not build powerplants without having a previous agreement and permits from the Ministry. What happened was a two-punch blow dealt by the government (and in Venezuela, the government means Chavez): they nationalized the electric power generation plants, and they failed to invest and maintain to make sure the system capacity would match demand.

Come to think of it, the problem was created by the current administration, which has been in power for 10 years, and which is well known for its overall lack of capable individuals in high places.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Braulio Donating Member (860 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #39
54. Typical misguided response, a new Ministry
The proliferation of ministries is one sign of mismanagement. The problem is at the top, creating a new ministry isn't going to solve the problem. I've read portions of their plan responding to the current crisis and it's typical: they're organizing the response the wrong way, they are building many of the new power plants in the wrong spots, and in many cases are using drivers which consume diesel. It's sheer mad hatter madness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
33. Brainwashed Venezuelans
listening to the corporate fascist pro-american media.

All is well, there is nothing to complain about. Hugo is working tirelessly on your behalf. If anything you should spend every waking moment thanking god/hugo that he has deemed you worthy of his leadership!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Braulio Donating Member (860 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #33
52. Maybe they should build him a cathedral?
LOL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverweb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
41. Time for innovative solutions, Hugo.
You can lead the world if you do these things simultaneously and on a big scale:

(1) Water-less/composting toilets/urinals for all. Flushing is one of the biggest water wasters there is, and you can't afford it.

(2) Combination solar electricity/desalination plants. Do it while you still have oil to export, and you still have your power and influence.

Good luck!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Braulio Donating Member (860 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #41
53. You should go to Caracas and give them advice
Your advice is incredibly impractical, but I'm sure that, given the lack of ability displayed by the Chavez administration to run their economy, you could go to Caracas, study the facts, and improve their performance.

Just so you know, one of the greatest problems in a large city such as Caracas is garbage displacement. This means efforts have to be made to REDUCE the amount of solid waste which has to be moved by truck. Your proposal for water less toilets is enormously counterproductive.

Venezuela has the largest natural gas reserves in South America (used to be in the Western Hemisphere, but new technologies have increased US reserves recently, therefore I doubt Venezuela's are larger than the gringos'). This means they can generate cheap electric power using gas fired power plants, which are easy to build by a capable organization. Venezuela also has untapped hydropower potential.

Venezuela also has enormous water resources, they just happen to be located away from the main cities - the current water shortage is a temporary issued associated with drought which impacted the water catchment lakes built to store water. A well-run administration can overcome the problem by building additional water catchment sites. However, long term they would do better encouraging growth in middle sized cities away from Caracas, the capital. This is a tall order given the lack of private investment in Venezuela today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Latin America Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC