Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cuba is at a critical turning point. By Jorge Castañeda | NEWSWEEK

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » Latin America Donate to DU
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-24-10 03:08 AM
Original message
Cuba is at a critical turning point. By Jorge Castañeda | NEWSWEEK
Well, well, well if it isn't ole turncoat Jorge C. I remember when he went on Radio in Miami and pushed the story of chaos in an attempt to create chaos, I think it was the Peruvian Embassy crisis. I wonder how much fula he gets for this kind of writing. F him and his tinderbox.

From the magazine issue dated Apr 26, 2010

Since 1959, fortunes have been lost betting on the end of the Cuban revolution. Countless books, essays, articles, statements, and resolutions have predicted the fall of Fidel Castro. These false warnings have been a source of endless frustration for those hoping for radical change in Cuba. Despite this record, it's time to raise the question again. Is the Castro regime entering its final days?

Three factors suggest Cuba is at a critical turning point. First, the economy is in its most severe crisis since the Soviet Union collapsed and stopped subsidizing Cuba in the early 1990s. Last year's fall in the price of nickel (Cuba's largest export) and in tourism, the stagnation of remittances from relatives in Miami, and recent hurricanes have paralyzed the island. Blackouts, terrible deficiencies in health care, food shortages, a housing crisis, and Cuba's suspension of debt payments to its creditors since January 2009 all point to a bleak future. Cuba now relies heavily on subsidies from Venezuela, but they're not enough. Cubans are accustomed to suffering, but their misery is reaching new lows. And it's no longer so easy to blame American imperialism. Barack Obama seems to be hugely popular with ordinary Cubans.


That explains factor No. 2: new signs of public protest. A hunger-strike movement is gathering steam after the death of political prisoner Orlando Zapata, a 42-year-old activist who refused food for more than 80 days. Zapata's death dashed any chance of improving relations with the European Union, the United States—which condemned his death and called for the release of all political prisoners—and Mexico, which didn't, and whose president had planned to travel to Havana and no longer has the leeway to do so. And it inspired another dissident, Guillermo Fariñas, to launch his own hunger strike, seeking the release of other imprisoned activists. Fariñas has a rare eloquence and altruism, which are winning him a stature few dissidents have ever achieved. If his health starts to fail, events could take an unforeseeable turn.

Meanwhile, women fighting for the release of their relatives from jail, organized as the Ladies in White, are creating another new threat to the regime. For years they have marched in protest and have gone to mass every Sunday, seeking freedom for their loved ones, but suddenly their efforts have gained new momentum. Authorities can no longer prevent the marches, so they have opted, with classic Castro-Cuban skill and cynicism, to organize pro-government crowds to harass the women. Then police escort the ladies away, ostensibly to protect them from the jeering crowd. Photographs of the mob scene have circulated around the world, in the news and over the Internet.

It's not clear how widely those photos, or the news of Zapata's martyrdom and Fariñas's challenge, have circulated in Cuba itself. Cuban authoritarianism has long been able to isolate any opposition and to hold the Cuban population in a state of ignorance. Now, partly due to the tiny opening tolerated by Raúl Castro in allowing cell phones, the Internet, and calls from Miami, as well as to a small increase in visits by relatives from the U.S., thanks to Obama, Cubans may know a lot more than they used to.

That leads to factor No. 3: Fidel Castro, now 83, is ailing and has ceded day-to-day control to his brother Raúl, 78, who is no Fidel. The comandante would have freed Zapata, or executed him, but he never would have backed himself into a corner as his younger brother did. It would have been the same with Fariñas, or with the Ladies in White, especially when these protests were erupting in the midst of an economic debacle. In August 1994 Fidel showed up in a jeep at the Malecón in Havana, in the middle of a mass exodus of boat people, to quiet a boisterous crowd of protesters with the magic of his words and the implicit threat of brutal repression. Raúl Castro is not capable of such a feat. He lacks the political instincts that allowed his brother for half a century to sniff out potential adversaries even before they saw themselves as such.

The field is tinder-dry. Only a tiny spark exists. But the firefighters are exhausted. And the last hope for the Cuban revolution, residing in Caracas, could go under at any moment. This feels like an unprecedented moment in the history of Castroism. It could be just another flare-up, or a perfect storm.

Castañeda is a former foreign minister of Mexico, Global Distinguished Professor at New York University, and a fellow at the New America Foundation.

Find this article at http://www.newsweek.com/id/236508
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-24-10 03:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yup. It was the Peruvian Embassy.
CUBANEWS

here:

Castro's government Thursday accused the U.S. government's Miami-based Radio Marti of provoking the embassy occupation by repeatedly broadcasting statements made in Miami by Mexican Foreign Secretary Jorge Castaneda, which it said were interpreted as "an open invitation to occupy the embassy of Mexico in Cuba.''



February 28, 2002


Cuban-Americans monitoring embassy occupation in Havana

By Ken Thomas. Associated Press Writer.Posted on Thu, Feb. 28, 2002 in The Miami Herald

MIAMI - (AP) -- Cuban exile leaders Thursday were closely monitoring reports from Havana, where a group of asylum-seeking Cubans were occupying the Mexican Embassy and threatening to jump from the roof if police tried to apprehend them.

Many saw the situation as a possible foreshadowing of the 1980 storming of the Peruvian Embassy in Havana by Cubans anxious to flee the island. The infamous Mariel boatloaft soon followed, flooding Florida with 125,000 refugees.

''It's just like the Mariel thing -- a small group takes action and then all this follows,'' said Jose Basulto, founder of exile group Brothers to the Rescue. "This may be the beginning of all of the situations to take place.''

City and Miami-Dade County police said there were no early reports of demonstrations in Florida. Many residents were also monitoring local news and radio reports, which were broadcasting information about the situation.

A hijacked bus crashed into the gates of the Mexican Embassy late Wednesday and about 20 Cubans rushed inside the building. Later, more than a dozen stood on the roof shouting anti-Fidel Castro slogans and promising to jump if police came after them.

Castro's government Thursday accused the U.S. government's Miami-based Radio Marti of provoking the embassy occupation by repeatedly broadcasting statements made in Miami by Mexican Foreign Secretary Jorge Castaneda, which it said were interpreted as "an open invitation to occupy the embassy of Mexico in Cuba.''

Castaneda said Tuesday during the dedication of the Cultural Institute of Mexico in Miami "the doors of the Mexican embassy are open to all Cuban citizens, just as are those of Mexico.''

Leobardo Rueda, a Radio Marti spokesman, declined immediate comment about the Cuban government's accusations.

Joe Garcia, executive director of the Cuban American National Foundation, said the embassy occupation was an "indication of the close relationship (Mexican President Vicente Fox) has with the opposition in Cuba.''

Garcia said the leadership in Miami was calling for calm. The powerful exile organization denounced comments by the Cuban government that blamed Radio Marti for inciting the embassy occupation.

''This is created by Cuba. Make no mistake about it,'' Garcia said.

Members of the Cuban Liberty Council in Miami issued an appeal to Fox, asking the government to respect the Cuban citizens right to seek political asylum and assure their safety.

''Under no circumstances should they be handed over to Cuban authorities in whose hands they will face brutal reprisals,'' said the council, formed by people who recently broke away from CANF, seen by some exiles as softening its stance against the Cuba government.

Basulto called the occupation "a natural response from the people who can interpret any and every sign from the outside of the possibility of being free.''

''These type of things will likely occur in the future with more frequency because of the worsening conditions in the island,'' Basulto said.

Basulto and others noted the similarity to the circumstances that led to the Mariel boatlift in 1980, when a dispute over Cubans occupying the Peruvian Embassy led Cuba to withdraw its guards, leading to about 10,000 people to flood the mission grounds.

The 1980 occupation of that embassy began when six people crashed a bus into the gate and sought asylum.

Castro then opened the port of Mariel, and 125,000 Cubans fled to the United States in a chaotic boat exodus. The occupation of Peruvian embassy began when six people crashed a bus into the gate and sought asylum.

''We're watching the situation closely,'' Basulto said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
protocol rv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-10 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. Your time is running out
After 50 years of incompetence and brutal repression, your time is running out. That tottering regime run by octogenarians is going to be gone soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-10 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. You missed the point of my post
As I have said before I've been to Cuba many times. I was there during the Peruvian Embassy incident. It was fomented by Casteneda on a radio station in Miami.

Cuba continues without much mind of the hysteria in Miami. They've been doing it for 50 years and of all the supposed evidence there isn't much pointing to a change or outside pressures that will force them to react.

You have to be in Cuba to realize how little the reality of Miami is taken seriously, it's more like entertainment.

Mostly they would like their families to be reunited and for the economy to improve, and they know it will happen as soon as congress has the balls to do something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
protocol rv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I'm not in Miami, and I'm not in Peru
And I really couldn't care less about hysteria in Miami. I find this topic a fairly simple topic, the regime is a dictatorship. All dictatorships are bad. Therefore the regime in Cuba is bad. And I find it pathetic to have people who go to Cuba defend the regime merely because they went to Cuba.

Dictatorships are bad, period. You won't convince me they are a government system I should support even if the Cubans coat Castro's corpse with gold and place him on top of an obelisk. I also happen to talk to Cubans who say most of what foreigners who go to Cuba say is baloney, they laugh at you. Whom should I believe, a spot visitor who visits Cuba because he's a communist and wants to bond with his communist brothers, or people who were born in Cuba after Castro took over, and lived there most of their lives? The Cuban people, the real deal, are pragmatic. And the guys who talk say they'd rather see the Castro version of governance by something a little more 21st century.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-10 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. A question: how do you (anyone) see change occurring in Cuba?
Does anyone think that all of a sudden the Castros will be heading out in some kind of violent scenario?

Just what are the likely scenarios?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
protocol rv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I don't have the foggiest idea
Who could have thought, in 1989, that the Berlin wall would fall so soon? Who would have expected the end of the Soviet Union? Who thought the market would crash as severely as it did in 2008? Who knew Mockus six months ago?

Once we agree we don't have the foggiest idea, all we can do is sit, and wait. Change is coming, that's inevitable because Fidel Castro can't live forever, and we have a lot of evidence his younger brother doesn't agree with a lot of what Fidel orders. The one constant all these scenarios have is change. Or maybe not. Maybe Castro will die and nothing will change. As they say, bad things happen to good people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Ah, so you are a Raulista nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. As long as there's a Castro to distract with, the Cubaphobes will continue to obsess.
Edited on Wed Apr-28-10 05:03 PM by Mika
The only Cubans in Cuba who deserve even a modicum of attention are the US paid lackeys doing the bidding of the Miami & Washington based anti Castro industry.

Only Castro and them.

The supporters here of those who aid and abet terrorists continue that very tactic.



Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that
this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that Castro did this Castro did that









Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I love the LED lol!! They should put that on the US Interests Section Building nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
protocol rv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. is that what they call it?
I only go by what I hear. I think both brothers should retire to their big homes, learn to paint water colors, and write - and the Cuban media should be free so they can decide whether to publish them or not. Although I'm pretty sure there'll always be somebody willing to pay for their books.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Latin America Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC