Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Business groups want Cuba vote in the lame-duck

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » Latin America Donate to DU
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-10 07:52 PM
Original message
Business groups want Cuba vote in the lame-duck
http://thehill.com/business-a-lobbying/122835-business-groups-want-cuba-vote-in-the-lame-duck

La Loba taking over?! :
>A GOP takeover of the House could put Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla.) in charge of the Foreign Affairs Committee. Ros-Lehtinen, the panel’s current ranking member, is a firm opponent of repealing the travel ban.


Business groups want Cuba vote in the lame-duck
By Kevin Bogardus - 10/05/10 07:30 PM ET

A number of business associations are planning a lobbying blitz during the lame-duck session to repeal the U.S. travel ban to Cuba.

The bill ran into trouble last week when Rep. Howard Berman (D-Calif.), chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, postponed a markup of the legislation. An analysis by The Hill found Berman did not have the votes to move the bill through the panel and onto the House floor for a vote.

Despite the setback, lobbyists for business and farm groups say that this Congress may be their best opportunity to see the bill passed and signed into law. Republicans are expected to make big gains in the midterm elections and are seen as less likely to vote for a bill that loosens restrictions on Cuba.

“It will make it more difficult for sure,” said Chandler Goule, vice president of government relations for the National Farmers Union. “This is our best opportunity to pass it through the House. At least that would give us a precedent for the next Congress, a leg up.”

A GOP takeover of the House could put Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla.) in charge of the Foreign Affairs Committee. Ros-Lehtinen, the panel’s current ranking member, is a firm opponent of repealing the travel ban.

Goule’s group and others, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the National Foreign Trade Council (NFTC) and the National Pork Producers Council, plan to lobby lawmakers to take up the bill again during the lame-duck session.

“A vote by the committee that has jurisdiction over the travel provision of the bill would send a strong signal,” said Jake Colvin, a vice president at NFTC. “We have always thought the committee vote would be tougher than the floor vote. If you can get it out of committee, you can win on the floor.”

The bill, sponsored by Rep. Collin Peterson (D-Minn.), has gained co-sponsors throughout the year since being introduced in February. It now has 81 supporters.

The travel ban to Cuba was eased slightly last year. In March, President Obama signed an omnibus bill with a provision that allows Cuban-Americans to visit their relatives on the island and send them money.

Trade associations and farm groups have lent their support to Berman’s full repeal of the travel ban because it would open up more trade with Cuba. Specifically, the legislation would loosen financial restrictions on transactions between Cuban and American banks, potentially boosting U.S. farm exports to Cuba. In addition, it would lift a travel ban to Cuba — a potential boon for tourism and travel companies.

But political action committees for Cuban-American groups are opposed to the bill. They say the infusion of U.S. cash would help prop up the Castro regime, which has a record of human-rights abuses.

In postponing the markup last week, Berman said in a statement that he wanted more time to have a “robust and uninterrupted debate” on the bill, which he expected would happen “soon.” No decision, however, has been made as of yet on when the bill will be marked up.

While some fret about the bill’s chances next Congress, others argue that the progress made on the travel-ban repeal this Congress will not disappear during its next session. The legislation did move through the House Agriculture Committee on a 25-20 vote in its favor.

Patrick Kilbride, who works on Latin America policy for the Chamber, said the business group will pick up where it left off with the bill if it is not passed this Congress.

“The progress that has been made is not the kind of progress that will be lost by the end of a session of Congress. We will be picking up the ball where we left off last time,” Kilbride said.

Source:
http://thehill.com/business-a-lobbying/122835-business-groups-want-cuba-vote-in-the-lame-duck
The contents of this site are © 2010 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.
Comments (2)
The analysis by the Hill about why Berman postponed the mark-up was flawed in the original article and is not improved by repetition.

The argument advanced was based on the number who had cosponsored bills with travel sections but that is irrelevant to the count of probable votes. Ackerman, for example, had said publicly he would vote favorably in mark-up for the first time.

The reality was that the Democratic leadership pushed adjournment up to later the same night. A key roll call vote to adjourn was taken a half-hour into the intended mark-up period. According to C-Span both parties also scheduled pre-adjournment lunches.

I posted a similar observation twice with the original article but you did not publish it. I hope you will this time.

John McAuliff
Fund for Reconciliation and DevelopmentBY John McAuliff on 10/05/2010 at 22:34
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-10 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. The comments on the article are insightful:
Edited on Sun Oct-10-10 08:02 PM by flamingdem
Edited to note that this comment was included in the original post

comment:
The argument advanced was based on the number who had cosponsored bills with travel sections but that is irrelevant to the count of probable votes. Ackerman, for example, had said publicly he would vote favorably in mark-up for the first time.

The reality was that the Democratic leadership pushed adjournment up to later the same night. A key roll call vote to adjourn was taken a half-hour into the intended mark-up period. According to C-Span both parties also scheduled pre-adjournment lunches.

I posted a similar observation twice with the original article but you did not publish it. I hope you will this time.

John McAuliff
Fund for Reconciliation and DevelopmentBY John McAuliff on 10/05/2010 at 22:34
It is amazing that very typical Republican business groups such as the US Chamber of Commerce, US Farm Bureau, the National Foreign Trade Council, National Pork Producers, National Farmers Union would not receive support from conservative Republicans in Congress who typically oppose government regulations of farmers and business groups, and support freedom of trade and travel. These congressmen and women prefer to vote with extreme Cuban-American congresspeople that demand the US limits the rights of Americans to trade with and travel to Cuba. Even during the Cold War, Americans were never prohibited by our government form going to Russia or East Berlin. We took pride that Americans were not limited by our government. Yet we are prevented by the Cuban-American lobby, remnants of a previous dictatorship, and their PAC money form exercising our freedoms. Congress continues to ignore the will of the majority of Americans. Republican and Democrat values are thrown out the window by the power of a hand full of Cuban-Americans.
Milton Sanchez-Parodi, Poland, OHBY Milton Sanchez-Parodi, MD on 10/05/2010 at 22:58
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 03:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. Absolutely hoping that ugly little bulldog Ros-Lehtinen will get nowhere near
control of the Foreign Affairs Committee again. Nothing could be worse for Latin America policy than having that nasty, vindictive, violence-loving, murderous little thug exerting her militant, fascist, heavy-handed power all over again. She takes that position WAY too seriously, and sees it as a change to do deep damage to good people.

Hateful little troll. The worst. A female Jesse Helms. Just remember how long it took her to get to the side of the illegally presiding coup President of Honduras, Roberto Micheletti right after they violently kidnapped the man and flew him out of the country like criminals, showing absolutely no respect for the law, and no dignity whatsoever.

These people are too primitive, too coarse, too criminally inclined to be allowed to govern anywhere outside the pit of hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 03:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. It's good to see Ackerman has come around, at least temporarily.
It's really chilling to know how little a lot of the Congresspeople actually know about US policy and Cuba, themselves. It could be they are ignorant, or it could be they are simply too scared to cross the US "exile" Cubans.

Even one person crossing the line to vote correctly is a victory.

I like this comment after the article:
..... Congress continues to ignore the will of the majority of Americans. Republican and Democrat values are thrown out the window by the power of a hand full of Cuban-Americans.
Milton Sanchez-Parodi, Poland, OH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 03:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Latin America Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC