|
...this, and other crimes like it, with the vast majority of the murders of innocent people in Colombia committed by the Colombian military itself (about half) and its closely tied rightwing paramilitaries (the other half). 92% of the murders of trade unionists and 75% of all extrajudicial murders are committed by these connected forces. In addition, the Colombian military has driven 5 MILLION peasant farmers from their lands, using tactics of terror and murder--the second worst human displacement crisis on earth--with tens of thousands of them fleeing into neighboring Ecuador and Venezuela.
I don't condone killing by either side in Colombia's 70-year civil war. What I do believe, however, is that the FARC guerrillas have cause to be considered a legitimate armed force in the face of such horrendous official crime which has not ceased. Some 40 trade unionists have been murdered so far this year alone. The above stats are from 2005. These official and semi-official murders are on-going. How can anyone choose sides in this conflict, as the U.S. has done, larding the Colombian military with $7 BILLION in military aid for KILLING COLOMBIANS--innocent and armed alike--and furthermore having the U.S. military IN the country, at numerous bases, advising, colluding, "training" and providing high tech assistance.
This is not right. The U.S. should be joining with other countries in Latin America to END this civil war, not aggravating it with U.S. military aid and war profiteering--and this furthermore provides the temptation for militarists here to USE this civil war to put war assets in place for ADDITIONAL aggression, should the Bushwhacks get back in power or should Bushwhack operatives in the Pentagon or elsewhere in the U.S. government contrive a war and try to inflict it on President Obama whether he wants it or not. That is the danger of the U.S. USING a civil war like this to expand the Pentagon's presence in Latin America (and other places).
The corrupt, failed, murderous U.S. "war on drugs" is the other excuse for U.S. military bases and U.S. military operations in Colombia, Honduras, El Salvador, Panama, the Dutch islands right off the coast of Venezuela, Costa Rica and other places, including the reconstitution of the U.S. 4th Fleet in the Caribbean. This is trouble, believe me. U.S. militarization of the Central America/Caribbean region is bad news. The MILITARY is being SUBSTITUTED for what should be POLICE forces in dealing with illicit traffic and criminal gangs. Criminals have been turned into "terrorists," with--I might add--virtually no impact on the drug traffic. So have the FARC guerrillas. Now they are "terrorists"--even though they are Colombians engaged in armed resistance to an extremely blood-soaked fascist establishment that has one of the worst human rights records on earth.
What is this U.S. militarization FOR?
COLOMBIA provides us with the "what for." It is for KILLING opponents of fascist government, including thousands of peaceful opponents, and EMPLOYING terror--not fighting it--to subdue opposition to poverty, to U.S. "free trade for the rich," to corporate rule. And HONDURAS is the latest example of this "what for." Hundreds of peaceful opponents of the U.S. supported fascist government of Honduras have been murdered in this second U.S. client state, with U.S. tax dollars supporting the military, a U.S. military base and other facilities in Honduras, and close Pentagon relations with that military. It's almost as if the U.S. wants to instigate armed resistance in Honduras, to justify killing more leftists. How much can people take? How many beheaded peaceful activists, and teachers shot in the head in front of their students, can people take, in Honduras, before they despair of peaceful change?
|