Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bolivia, bad information and the State Department/

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » Latin America Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 10:05 PM
Original message
Bolivia, bad information and the State Department/
Bolivia, bad information and the State Department/
By david c. knowlton
Published Dec 4, 2010 01:01AM
Updated Dec 4, 2010 01:01AM

The release of thousands of secret documents by WikiLeaks justifiably troubles the U.S. government, but it also provides the rest of us with a window into the information on which American foreign policy is based. Though the window is broken and dirty, quite a lot can still be seen through it, and those glimpses are useful for evaluating our government and its policies.

Bolivia is one of the countries besides Cuba and Venezuela that troubles the United States in Latin America. Among the documents made public by WikiLeaks is a memorandum from the U.S. Embassy in Bolivia reporting on the buildup to that country’s Jan. 25, 2009, referendum on a new constitution. As a scholar who specializes in the study of Bolivia, I find the published memo important. It suggests how the United States filters information about a country in problematic ways that may well become the basis for making important decisions.

For example, while reporting the Bolivian opposition’s hand-wringing that it would probably lose the election, the Jan. 23 memo notes that “the forces of inertia seem to be conspiring against , particularly in the form of a largely uneducated rural base in the Altiplano,” or high plateau.

The memo repeats, as if it were analysis, the idea that Bolivian President Evo Morales’ support among rural Bolivians, most of whom are indigenous, is unreflective and a result of a lack of education. It continues to develop the theme of an uninformed mass blindly following the nation’s president, who generally has high public approval ratings, although the opposition and the U.S. government find him disturbing.

More:
http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/opinion/50797118-82/memo-rural-bolivia-education.html.csp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 01:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. Watch out for brackets in texts that you copy & paste...
An important word was left out of your quote because it was in brackets in the original. You need to remove the brackets when you copy and paste and replace them with ( ).

Here's the omission:

"For example, while reporting the Bolivian opposition’s hand-wringing that it would probably lose the election, the Jan. 23 memo notes that 'the forces of inertia seem to be conspiring against (the opposition), particularly in the form of a largely uneducated rural base in the Altiplano,” or high plateau.'"

The word "opposition" is key to understanding that the U.S. was rooting for the rich rightwing, white racist minority to beat the hugely popular Evo Morales, the first Indigenous president of Bolivia (a largely Indigenous country) in the referendum on the new constitution. We know that the these white separatists--rioters and murderers--were being funded and organized right out of the U.S. embassy, in September 2008, and that the DEA was conspiring with them. Morales eventually threw the U.S. ambassador, the DEA, the Peace Corps (which was also being used for spying) and the whole of the U.S. "war on drugs" out of the country. That's why they were able to have a peaceful vote on the new constitution.

This slander against Morales' supporters (most of the people in Bolivia), implying that they are stupid peasants, was no doubt written by a Bushwhack toady to the U.S. ambassador who had been evicted from Bolivia, given the date--only a month into the Obama administration. Bolivia's Indigenous majority may have been kept in poverty and denied educational opportunities by the fuckwads who were previously running Bolivia, but that does not mean that they are STUPID. In fact, their support for Morales and the new constitution demonstrates their intelligence, as well as their savvy at grass roots organizing and getting out the vote. NO ONE has done more to improve the dignity, income, opportunity and living conditions of Bolivia's poor majority than Morales. NOTHING has improved their country and their future more than his strong actions against U.S. interference and bullying, his rejection of the failed, corrupt, murderous U.S. "war on drugs," his tough re-negotiation of Bolivia's gas contracts to DOUBLE the revenues from one million to TWO million per year--money earmarked for social programs--and his multi-lateral (as opposed to U.S. dominated) trade policy, recently netting in Japan to fund a study for development of Bolivia's lithium deposits (one of the biggest in the world, a rare mineral needed in electronics) while making no promises to Japan's companies.

Is it smart of the "uneducated" poor to vote for and support Morales? Not in the Bushwhacks' "Alice in Wonderland" world, where stupid people are much preferred.

And the kicker--pointed out by the writer of this article, David c. Knowlton, is that the flunkie writing memo is DEAD WRONG:

"Bolivia’s rural people have waged a century-long struggle for education. This has led to schools in almost every community and to institutes of higher education, including normal schools and universities that receive rural students. In my experience, the Altiplano has changed enormously over the last 30-odd years. Its people speak the national language, have formal education, and can articulate sharp and well-developed arguments. Furthermore, these often differ from those of the national elites because education has provided the rurals with the means to develop their own perspectives and positions."

He points out further than most Altaplano residents under 60 are now literate, and although he takes an unnecessary swipe at the highly regarded Cuban literacy program provided to Bolivia and other countries FOR FREE--a program that is now addressing the problem of illiteracy among the older generation--he does so in trying to stress the dedication of this rural population and its rural teachers to learning, demonstration over many decades, against great odds.

One of my concerns about the knuckleheaded stupidity of Bushwhacks in the foreign service and the diplomatic corps--and their damage to those services--is that it goes hand in hand with the most wretched, vile, stupid and disastrous foreign policy. Not that I support U.S. (multinational corporate/war profiteer) foreign policy goals, but I CAN'T STAND STUPIDITY wherever it arises. Stupidity and brutality are evil brothers. And the Bushwhacks encouraged both.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
social_critic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Cuba does nothing for free
Whatever Cuba does abroad, it's either paid for by the Venezuelans, or it's paid for by the suffering Cuban people, whose meager resources are tapped to polish the communist regime's credentials.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. You need to consider tailoring your wild remarks for a literate audience.
Don't forget you're not speaking to some group of citizens in Miami.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
social_critic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I assume you think the cost of Cuban "aid" is free?
Those are resources taken from the Cuban people. During the days of the Soviet Union (may it rest in peace), the communists put a lot of emphasis on sports programs, cultural programs, and other topics which would allow them to showcase their "advanced status". As it turns out, once the USSR fell, the world could see the working class in that slave empire lived in very poor conditions. The same applies to Cuba, aid is given to other nations as the people suffer - this serves as a propaganda tool for the regime. Furthermore, Venezuelan largesse and cash flow to the Castro regime is well known. And I think intelligent people outside of Miami realize that a) the USSR was a faking its wealth a b) so does Cuba. If Cuba really had the resources, the communists wouldn't be firing hundreds of thousands of workers in the near future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Cuban medical people have been working abroad in the world LONG before the Venezuelan people
elected Hugo Chavez as their President. LONG, LONG BEFORE THEN.

They are hailed, celebrated around the world, and there is NOTHING Miami right-wing reactionary hardliners, or reactionary elements embedded in the US government can do about it. NOTHING.

You little tyrants are going to learn, perhaps, before you succomb, you are NOT destined to control the Americas. Period. It will become clearer and clearer they are NOT going to allow themselves to be dragged backwards into hell again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Of course Cuban medical people have been working abroad for a long time
Alongside the political officers that accompany them to ensure their commitment to the revolution -- and to expedite their collected local intelligence reports back to Havana.

A most excellent intelligence collection cover indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Good one! One tiny island conspiring against the whole planet. Hilarious. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Guess that one tiny island never had any exernal sponsorship
Looks like that dunce cap is pulled down over your eyes as well as your ears.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
9.  Please. You're going to wear yourself out. Spying for Russia. That's a hot one. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Keep pulling that cap down tighter
It suits you quite well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Latin America Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC