Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

‘Stay Union-Free’ Pushed by Target, Michaels as Obama Law Looms

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 11:37 AM
Original message
‘Stay Union-Free’ Pushed by Target, Michaels as Obama Law Looms
By Holly Rosenkrantz

Dec. 29 (Bloomberg) -- Target Corp. retooled a training video to warn workers against a bill that would make union organizing easier. Michaels Stores Inc. told investors “our businesses could be impacted” by the measure. Enrollment in Jackson Lewis LLP’s “How to Stay Union-Free” seminars tripled.

Companies are rallying to fend off a so-called card-check law sought by labor leaders and backed by President Barack Obama. While the bill stalled in Congress this year as health- care legislation dominated debate, anti-union groups say they expect the president and Democrats to deliver next year on a compromise version of the legislation.

“As we approach the 2010 elections, the unions are really going to want their pound of flesh,” said Randy Johnson, who handles labor issues for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the nation’s largest business lobbying group. “Even if we defeat the card-check bill, it’s entirely possible that other changes to the National Labor Relations Act will come up, and some of those will likely make it easier to organize the workplace.”

Companies have added anti-union videos to training programs, required employees to sit through anti-union meetings and hired outside labor-relations consultants as a pre-emptive strike against a union organizing campaign.

“The whole culture that currently allows us to be a low- cost producer while paying top wages would probably be destroyed” by the legislation, Craig Milum, president of Milum Textile Services, a Phoenix-based linen supplier, said in an interview.

MORE...

BLOOMBERG: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=aWEQS_CInpY0&pos=14
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. Sad Target is supposed to be the Good Guys. WalMart funds anti-minimum wage programs/increases..nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Target is no better than WalMart in labor relations.
People on DU like to fool themselves into thinking otherwise, but there is plenty of information about their anti-labor positions on the web.

They treat their employees just as badly as any other anti-union outfit.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Ask DUer TwixVoy about Target
He was leadership at a Target store, and confirms they're just as bad as Walmart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. I've actually never been in a Walmart or Target. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. I once thought so too.
But I have seen first hand how Target is every bit as nasty in their anti-union approach as Wal-Mart. Don't be fooled by their reputation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. One tried and true way to stay "union free" (two parts):
1. Pay decent wages and benefits and pensions with equitable rights in employment.
2. Fairly bargain for wages, benefits, pensions, sick days, termination, hiring including due process.

Do that and unions will be obsolete.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. And you do that how without someone acting on the employees behalf?
Any situation that is one sided will eventually result in an injustice without recourse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. My point. Unions are needed because employers/management are not likely
to be fair without being compelled to do so. They always have free will to choose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. The threat of unionization might compel an employer to do that
That's another problem with laws that weaken unions. If the threat of unionization is serious, the employer might be compelled to offer their employees better wages and better benefits in order to prevent them from unionizing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
3. I heard on the radio today that DeMint is blocking Obama's nominee for TSA head
Edited on Tue Dec-29-09 11:58 AM by BrklynLiberal
because he would allow TSA employees to unionize!!

http://chattahbox.com/us/2009/12/29/politics-blocking-vote-on-nominees-to-head-tsa-and-customs-and-border-protection/


<snip>
What’s the TSA chief doing in the aftermath of the attempted Christmas airplane bombing? Nothing, because the confirmation of Erroll Southers, a former FBI agent and the Los Angeles World Airports Police Department assistant chief for homeland security and intelligence, has been pending since September. South Carolina Republican Sen. Jim DeMint has helped block the president’s choice for TSA the division of the Department of Homeland Security that oversees airport security, over his concerns that Southers might let TSA screeners join a labor union. The unrepentant DeMint, in a statement, had said the Christmas day terror attempt was a “perfect example of why the Obama administration should not unionize the TSA.” DeMint claims unionization of TSA workers would give “union bosses” the power “to veto or delay future security improvements at our airports.”

<snip>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. We were already boycotting Michael's since the now-defunct BuyBlue.org site exposed them. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
8. The US chamber of commerce AKA/ flat earth society.
Deny Global Climate Change Deny Unions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burning rain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
11. What a bunch of hysterics.
In reality they have nothing to worry about: any version of EFCA that can get 60 voters in the Senate will be worthless pap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 03:06 AM
Response to Original message
14. The Dayton connection seems strange. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC