Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Waited Six Days To Discuss Shoe Bomber With No GOP Complaints

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 04:28 PM
Original message
Bush Waited Six Days To Discuss Shoe Bomber With No GOP Complaints
Bush Waited Six Days To Discuss Shoe Bomber With No GOP Complaints

The bellowing by Republicans over the Obama administration's supposedly lackadaisical response to the attempted bombing of an airliner over Detroit seems as much about political posturing as legitimate national security concerns.

How else to explain the GOP's relatively quiet reaction eight years ago to President George W. Bush's detached response after a similarly-botched terrorist attack?

On December 22, 2001, Richard Reid -- known more infamously as the shoe bomber -- failed in his attempt to blow up a Miami-bound jet using explosives hidden in his shoe. Coming less than four months after September 11, there already were deep concerns about a potential attack during the upcoming holiday break. Nevertheless, President Bush did not directly address the foiled plot for six days, according to an extensive review of newspaper records from that time period. And when he did, it was only in passing.

The day of the attempted attack, for example, the Associated Press reported that "White House officials" were monitoring the situation throughout the afternoon and that "President Bush received two briefings" on the matter while at Camp David for the holidays. Spokesman Scott McClellan, meanwhile, told reporters that administration officials were consulting with acting Massachusetts Gov. Jane Swift -- the plane Reid boarded made an emergency landing at Boston's Logan International Airport.

"The White House has been monitoring the situation since early on today," McClellan said, according to a Washington Post article published on December 23. The lead statement came from Swift, who lauded the "heroic acts" of "the flight attendants and passengers who helped subdue the suspect."

<SNIP>

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/12/29/bush-waited-nine-days-to_n_406307.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah, the hypocrites..what does anyone expect from them?..
Except more of the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoCubsGo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Also expect them to ignore...
...the fact that the Bushies put in place that the system that failed by allowing this guy to get on to that plane. Hypocrites, indeed. If anyone wants to blame President Obama for anything, it's trusting that the so-called "safeguards" that were in place when he took office are adequate and appropriate. Hopefully, at this point, he has learned that they can't be trusted on ANYTHING.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. What exactly
part of the "system" are you talking about, that failed, GoCubs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. And, this..Who's running the TSA? No one, thanks to Sen. Jim DeMint
<snip>

WASHINGTON — An attempt to blow up a trans-Atlantic flight from Amsterdam to Detroit on Christmas Day would be all-consuming for the administrator of the Transportation Security Administration — if there were one.

The post remains vacant because Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., has held up President Barack Obama's nominee in opposition to the prospect of TSA workers joining a labor union.

As al Qaida claimed responsibility Monday for the thwarted attack and President Barack Obama made a public statement about it, Democrats urged DeMint to drop his objection and allow quick confirmation of nominee Erroll Southers, a counterterrorism expert, when the Senate reconvenes in three weeks.

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/81356.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azmouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. And if Obama had spoken out the day the incident happened
the Republicans would have found some way to complain about that.
They had their talking points ready no matter what happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
O is 44 Donating Member (740 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. They only get away with it...
because the media allows them to. Did you see the joke of an interview done by CNN just now with the lying bastard Demint? She asked him why he was putting a hold on the TSA guy and he went into a rant slamming the President. Then she says the famous words as pointed out by Jon Stewart, "we'll leave at that" Ugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. Oh geez I completely forgot that!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
8. Chimpy had a reason to wait 6 days, he was on vacation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC