Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ACLU: President Obama Issues Orders To Reduce Government Secrecy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 06:48 PM
Original message
ACLU: President Obama Issues Orders To Reduce Government Secrecy

President Obama Issues Orders To Reduce Government Secrecy

December 30, 2009
Government Should Stop Suppressing Key Information, Says ACLU

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: (212) 549-2666; media@aclu.org

NEW YORK – President Obama Tuesday night issued an executive order and an accompanying presidential memorandum directing executive agencies to make more information public when possible and eliminate unnecessary government secrecy.

The following can be attributed to Michael German, American Civil Liberties Union National Security Policy Counsel and former FBI Agent:

    "We welcome President Obama's executive order and memorandum which have the potential to improve the classification system for government documents, and appreciate that the administration, in an unprecedented move, incorporated into its policies public input gained through an open meeting and weblog. Although some more comprehensive measures called for by the ACLU and others were not fully realized in the new order, it is encouraging that the president described the new order as just one step in a process toward establishing 'a more fundamental transformation of the security classification.' We look forward to continuing to work with the administration on this issue to ensure the government is properly protecting information where necessary, while ensuring public access to as much information as possible."
The following can be attributed to Jameel Jaffer, Director of the ACLU National Security Project:

    "These documents rightly acknowledge that too much information is being kept secret, and that excessive secrecy compromises national security and undermines our democracy. We are particularly pleased that the president has eliminated a rule that gave the intelligence community the authority to veto declassification decisions made by an interagency panel.

    "In a next step toward improving government transparency, we hope that the administration will now reconsider its refusal to release crucial documents relating to the Bush administration's national security policies. The CIA is still withholding documents about its rendition, detention and interrogation program. The Justice Department is still withholding the legal memos that supplied the basis for the National Security Agency's warrantless wiretapping program. The Defense Department is still withholding the interrogation directives used by special forces in Afghanistan. The suppression of these documents deprives the American public of information it needs in order to evaluate the wisdom of government policy, to hold officials accountable for their decisions and to ensure that the mistakes and abuses of the past are not repeated in the future."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for the article, Pro Sense
"These documents rightly acknowledge that too much information is being kept secret, and that excessive secrecy compromises national security and undermines our democracy. We are particularly pleased that the president has eliminated a rule that gave the intelligence community the authority to veto declassification decisions made by an interagency panel."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. Go on wit ya baaad self! That's Change we can believe in!
And thank God for the ACLU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R for all the "Obama=Bush" people who must've missed this thread.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I was just going to do the same thing.
Funny how many crickets there are over this......


Kicketty
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidpdx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. Goddammit this isn't change we can believe in
Edited on Thu Dec-31-09 08:57 AM by davidpdx
:sarcasm:

:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. Kicked and recommended. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 04:53 AM
Response to Original message
7. Its excellent news and should get more airplay
but taking on corporate power and the neocon agenda is where he can really score points with people that he can actually score points with.

In more reasonable times Obama would be seen by almost everyone as the shit but the rub is he's not much on the remaking the wheel stuff and unfortunately that is what the times call for. The stakeholders at the table shit is going to kill us one way or the other, either by the fracturing or the huge damage the stakeholders bring to every effort.

If he leads then the majority of people will have his back. FDR got the people on his side and then demanded they send him not only more people but more people to do it his way.

Some say FDR needed WWII to finally pull us out and that's true but it wouldn't have been if he hadn't finally relented to the idiot conservatives. All WWII did to pull us out of the hole is we spent shit tons of money and used about every person we could to do what needed doing. Spending all that money on infrastructure, R&D of all sorts, and say construction of homes for those without them at the time would have yielded similar results.

We need a war on our country being fucked to hell and I think Obama could be a great Commander in Chief in that effort but he has to accept it is fucked up and not just a little frayed on the edges.

Again, good job on restoring a little of America. It really does mean a lot. I'm all about encouraging and helping with the clean up. I just get alarmed when sometimes he looks like he went out and got another bucket or two of nasty looking stuff that says industrial cleanser but looks and smells like sewage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 05:04 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. He's only been at it for 11 months.
Give him a little time please.
It's the least that you can do,
since he's gonna be there one way of the other
for the next 3 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 05:05 AM
Response to Original message
9. But...but...but...Obama is Bush 3. This isn't supposed to be change I can believe in. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 05:10 AM
Response to Original message
10. A good step though it doesn't erase the DOJ's actions so far.
Maybe this can be the first step back towards some assemblance to the rule of law and transparency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC