Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"if somebody's father says his son is an extremist, the son should be immediately on a list"...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 10:19 AM
Original message
"if somebody's father says his son is an extremist, the son should be immediately on a list"...
Edited on Sun Jan-03-10 10:20 AM by zulchzulu
F&cking Joe Lieberman on George StayOnTopOfThis's show said that chilling statement, which is right out of Orwell's book "1984".

I fully expect him to offer legislation where you can get a reward if you turn your neighbor in. Turn in a family and get a pony.

Obviously, when Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab's dad alerted US authorities in Nigeria about his nutty son, a case should be made and investigation should continue to see if it pans out.

But to just give accusations such power is certainly a slippery slope. I fear a trend that will make McCarthyism look like a puppy show is coming even if we aren't actually attacked, as Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab's failed attempt was an attempt, not a successful strike.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. He is as detestable and self-serving a man as was ever born
The one thing that makes him worse than Limbaugh and Beck and that whole ilck is that Lieberman portrays himself as a pious religious man. Limbaugh and the rest may pander to the fundies, but I don't know that they personally claim to be so pious. That bumbs Lieberman's depravity up a notch, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyLib2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. This old family counselor has probably turned pale while reading that statement.
Edited on Sun Jan-03-10 10:29 AM by JohnnyLib2
I'll follow up on the context but WOW, what a slippery slope that one is, as you stated.





:scared: :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ohiodemoc Donating Member (13 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. The man told his father "this is the last contact we will ever had"
Edited on Sun Jan-03-10 10:33 AM by Ohiodemoc
Troubling. It would raise a big red flag if I were in charge of evaluating this man's danger, given the countries he had visited.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
4. Where is all of this going to end up, really?
Are we heading for a Stasi-controlled state? Are we already there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
20. Measured in bytes, what do you figure the Stasi's data per person average was?
Today, with Carnivore, HSA, TIA, FBI, and other sundry efforts, what do you figure our comparable "data load" is.

I don't know either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-05-10 04:44 AM
Response to Reply #20
34. Oh, I can answer that (based on knowledge), actually.
With the US, and current technology, depending on the individual, it's a rotated load of 50-100Mb for the average nobody, with Gb and TB loads for high value targets and locations. Most of it gets thrown out, as nobody cares about the phone calls or groceries or loan payments or emails you had 10 years ago. On the more extreme ends, there are >20 Gb/s monitoring abilities in things like nuclear weapons facilities, which can be a huge footprint.

The Stasi had *much* more limited technology, keeping them down to 1-3 MB per person (depending on how you count it, paper scans are horribly inefficient to store, emails are tiny in comparison).

Put another way, however:
How many documents about you did the Stasi have before google?
After google?

For my name I found 40,400 documents in google.
For a nickname I found 7,950 more documents.
For another (more generic) nickname I found 702,000 documents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CK_John Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
5. What if the father was the radical or just a nut who is pissed the son hadn't called often enough?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. That's my question - what if a jealous wife
called in to say that her husband was going should not be trusted on a plane.


I believe the brave father. He did his best to keep us safe but the buck stops at our Airplane Security System.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. oops, wrong place
Edited on Sun Jan-03-10 04:12 PM by ret5hd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JaneQPublic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-05-10 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #5
30. "Hello, Homeland Security? I'd like to report my son... Glenn Beck." (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
6. How badly injured are you if your name is on a list requiring a security check?
Edited on Sun Jan-03-10 11:04 AM by stray cat
and what if the son had sent a note telling his family not to contact him he had gone to Yeman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheBigotBasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. How about if you are wrongly put on a no fly list?
Like Yousuf Islam (Cat Stevens)or the Marine reservist Staff Sgt. Daniel Brown.

It is a stupid and arbitrary list that lacks decent intelligence.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/10/6/152311/510
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polmaven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Or Ted Kennedy!
Back in late 2001 (or maybe in early 2002) Ted actually had to be cleared by Federal officials because his name was on a no-fly list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #11
24. Really? Gee, I wonder how THAT happened?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSzymeczek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
26. Or Edward Moore Kennedy.
He was on a no-fly list , as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eShirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
8. Someone remind me again why we used to be told the Soviet Union was bad?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
9. Well who else do we expect will notice when someone is crossing these lines?
All these killers leave clues as to their instability. Family is best positioned to pick it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
10. What if someone says their ex-wife in an extremist?
Hey, this terrorist list could become a lot of fun
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Or their Senator!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
14. Actually that should require a higher level before letting it mean something
Especially from fathers in very patriarchal cultures, like Nigeria.

They could just be trying to control their son's life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LovinLife Donating Member (366 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
15. Ummmmmmmm, I agree w/ this. I'm shocked u don't. Its acqusations from his father. Not some random
Edited on Sun Jan-03-10 03:09 PM by LovinLife
person. He should go on the no fly list until things are sorted out. Some kind of investigation should take place to see how long he should stay on the list and if he's a serious threat. This guy's father went to an embassy and told them about his son, he should've went on the no fly list after that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. An accusation that's uninvestigated should put a person on a No-Fly list?
Can I buy you a copy of Orwell's book "1984"? It's on me.

:crazy:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LovinLife Donating Member (366 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-05-10 02:11 AM
Response to Reply #22
32. U put him on the list and then u investigate it. If he's clean, take him off the list. This seems
rational to me. Even Jon Stewart was perplexed that the guys father raising a red flag didn't attract more attention from different intel agencies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parker CA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
16. So the enemy retaliates by calling in hundreds of thousands of names of "extremist sons" and ruins
any ability for the US to track anything. Brilliant, Joe, just brilliant. Next, we'll have to go back to looking for people not on the list, since the list will be compiled of completely bogus information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AwakeAtLast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
17. I heard the exact same thing on Face the Nation this morning
Can't remember who said it though...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
19. Let's report Joe Lieberman, Collins, and that ass George Will
I think they are all extremists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
21. Why doesn't he just go Republican
that way people know his true colors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Because then he'll just be one of THEM. He won't get the attention he gets now
because he won't have any leverage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
25. I thought I herd the sound of thugs in jackboots marching when I read that.
Edited on Sun Jan-03-10 06:52 PM by Odin2005
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. Exactly n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
27. Oh there are people here at DU who think it should work that way /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-05-10 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #27
31. Yes there are. Some believe in torture too. Wow. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JaneQPublic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-05-10 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
29. So, if you're a pissed-off neighbor, ex-spouse, or disgruntled employee...
...you can call in a name and get back at the person you have a grudge against?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LovinLife Donating Member (366 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-05-10 02:13 AM
Response to Reply #29
33. If that person wants to face jail for lying, then by all means. But this isn't a bad thing IMO.
Maybe you all have a problem w/ the person that said it. I think Lieberman is scum too, but this makes sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC