Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

malloy says undie bomber was another pnac/cheney inside job.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
RepublicanElephant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 09:51 PM
Original message
malloy says undie bomber was another pnac/cheney inside job.
he was quoting from this article:

Questions mount over attempt to bomb Detroit-bound jetliner

The official discussion repeats the same rhetorical trope employed to cover up the role of US intelligence agencies before the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001—that they failed to “connect the dots.” This metaphor suggests a highly abstruse process in which many small details, each seemingly innocent in itself, are correlated through sophisticated analysis by experts familiar with the patterns of terrorist operations.

No such operation was required to detect the Northwest Airlines bomb plot. The facts listed above were a series of fire alarms, each sufficient in itself to give the alert. To stop Abdulmuttalab from boarding the US-bound jetliner was a routine police matter, one that would ordinarily be executed without difficulty by the government of any middle-sized country, let alone by the most powerful military/intelligence apparatus on the planet.

If the Nigerian was allowed to board the jet in Amsterdam, it was because at some level within the US military/intelligence apparatus, the decision was made to allow him to do so.

The real failure to “connect the dots” is the refusal to draw any conclusions from the inaction of the US intelligence apparatus. Who made the decision not to act? Why did they make this decision? Was the intention that the would-be bomber succeed or fail? Was it a deliberate attempt to undermine the Obama administration? Was it a deliberate attempt to provide a pretext for further US military action in the Middle East?

http://wsws.org/articles/2010/jan2010/bomb-j04.shtml



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MrMickeysMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Who will pick up this story and mainstream it?
I came in late to this and it's stunning...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RepublicanElephant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. he said olbermann and maddow were heading in this direction. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. I got that same impression from their broadcasts of tonight
I'm watching Olbermann again right now.

Seems like Cheney is getting hammered for his assertions this time around. Chris Matthews accusing Politico today, to its face, that it's used by Cheney as Drudge is used was pretty wild.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I watched Morning Joe and saw that Mike Allen from Politico called Cheney
Edited on Mon Jan-04-10 10:24 PM by jenmito
to ask his opinion of Obama's handling of the situation. And it looked like Jonathan Martin knew that when he kept claiming he didn't know how Cheney got his info. to Politico.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. And Matthews no doubt knew that about Martin by the time his show went on the air
Well, around DU Politico was quickly recognized as a hack operation even if they had some good articles now and then. Just this morning I objected to the tone of an article they published about how the Obama's spent their Sunday (yesterday) in Hawaii. It was obvious what Politico was up to and it was no good. The url to my reply in that thread...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=433&topic_id=109388&mesg_id=109534
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parker CA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. Mathews tore them up today. He said "that isn't journalism." Loved seeing it!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. MSNBC via Richard Wolffe was reporting something about the possibility
of someone intentionally withholding the intel...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-05-10 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
23. I saw that! It really jumped out at me and made me think.
I am NOT a conspiracy theorist, but all of a sudden it made me think. All those missed signals leading up to the guy getting on the plane in Amsterdam, how could that be? The TSA takes toothpaste tubes away from people if they're too big, but they couldn't get THIS right, with all the red flags?

Then the huge hullabaloo by the RW because the media and the president were responding negatively enough...hmmm...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JelloSka Donating Member (64 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. With Iraq about to be US-troop-less, the War Machine needs to find new places
Edited on Mon Jan-04-10 10:10 PM by JelloSka
To justify the making of tanks, planes, drones, bombs, night-vision goggles, etc.

Eisenhower warned us against the Military-Industrial complex.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Obama's not part of this "inside job" and he's very angry about it
Edited on Mon Jan-04-10 10:21 PM by jenmito
according to Richard Wolffe at MSNBC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. He should be. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-05-10 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #5
21. Actually, that was Malloy's point.
He believes Cheney and the neocon shitbags are doing this to deliberately damage Obama. Since he won't give them an easy setup like Clinton did with his sexual "extra curricular activities", they have to create some fictitious "terra" incident. And had the bomb actually worked and killed everybody on the plane... oh well, what's a few hundred more dead bodies to the Bush Crime Family?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Basically you're right, JelloSka; although, it appears that we are leaving BILLIONS of dollars
worth of equipment behind. That ought to keep some military supply contractors happy for a while.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NBachers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. Soviet-era show-puppet government, Pravda, and the KGB
When I was a kid, I remember hearing, "Their media is controlled; they are told how to think and what to believe."

And now it's come home to where I live.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tledford Donating Member (633 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-05-10 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
24. +1, sadly. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spiritual_gunfighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
7. The CNN story a few days ago
that said that the CIA had a file on this guy months ago made me think that there was some rogue element still loyal to Cheney within the CIA that wanted this attack to happen. I think there may have been a thread about it on DU as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. another LIHOP or MIHOP
It sure wasn't hard to spot this one. I got jumped on for being skeptical right up front.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spiritual_gunfighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. I remember when you did
I was wary of the initial reports as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greenpeach Donating Member (375 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
9. Everything they do is an attempt...
to undermine/overthrow, if possible, the Obama administration. Has this country ever seen such an aggregation of slimy, smarmy murderous creeps as comprise the right-wing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
15. This was a fake run
imagine all the trouble that it has caused and it didn't even happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
16. Using PETN without a detonator is... well, what Richard Reid did...
Edited on Mon Jan-04-10 11:21 PM by zulchzulu
In order for PETN to be at it's "best", you need a detonator (which would be nearly impossible under current TSA checking conditions) AND a hard surface to explode the device (not a human in the middle aisle) to make it "happen".

Inside job?

Are you fucking kidding? 9/11 was the ultimate inside job. In case people forgot, Al Qaeda is a CIA-based boogeyman to enhance the military industrial complex and rein fear among the non-thinking populace...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-05-10 05:27 AM
Response to Original message
19. but, please, let's not prosecute anyone for anything that can be proven
There were no consequences of any great degree for anybody for Iran-Contra, they came back and robbed us blind on the back of 9/11, sponsoring "contractors" and a war at great profit to themselves, and are now known to be war criminals, yet they walk freely among us and are not even prohibited from "serving" in "public office," and people are surprised they might have a "shadow government" (how's that "bipartisanship" and "team of rivals" thing working out?) and now speculate that another "terrorist incident" might be an inside job--quel surprise!

wake me up when somebody actually has the courage and the morality to actually do anything about war criminals and traitors--until then, they are free to plot their little plots through their moles and plants and an administration that appears to bend over backward to mollycoddle RW dead-weighters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-05-10 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
20. They had lines drawn for them they didn't have to "connect the dots"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-05-10 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
22. Democratic Underground, 2001-2009. Good night, sweet prince.
Edited on Tue Jan-05-10 11:55 AM by LoZoccolo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RepublicanElephant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-05-10 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
25. randi rhodes now on this. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC