Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

You know what I find odd about the whole underwear bomber debate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 03:50 PM
Original message
You know what I find odd about the whole underwear bomber debate
To my knowledge, no one has asked what would have happened had he, instead of the party crashing attention divas, had crashed the White House. This makes the whole fiasco at the White House even more scary. I do hope that the Secret Service has fixed that problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. I son't see the WH party crashing a big problem. The people who
git un were well known to almost everybody in Wash. and the WH. BFD that they got into a party. I don't see the Obamas getting excited about it and I don't think we should either. MANY< MANY MORE threats that were much more severe have been made against our Prez and I don't see a lot of media or even US railing against those! I don't GAS about a media hounding couple(s) looking to hit the TV as much as I care about the silent but determined singles who want to kill our Prez!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Also, the WH gate crashers were not on the list, but did go thru security checks,
metal detectors, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yeah, but so did the underwear bomber.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. unless the White House has the full body scanners
they wouldn't have caught the explosives anymore than the airport did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. it gives a whole new meaning to "roasting
chestnuts by an open fire."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoadRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
6. the screening to get into that dinner was far more intense then the airport security
he went through in Amsterdam... and no offense, but a guy like him trying to "crash" a state dinner wouldn't have flown. The people who did it dressed the part, spoke the part and were able to easily act the part and had been to other political functions in the past so they were recognized by other attendees. Al Quada ops would have a very difficult time pulling off the social aspect of entrance to an event like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. It's not the Secret Service but the head of their Protocol who thinks herself "too good"
to help monitor the gates where visitors are allowed in during that State Department Dinner. He name escapes me but she should have been the one fired. However, she's buddies with Michelle and Heaven forbid they fire their friends brought with them from Chicago. :eyes:

The Secret Service has a right to be miffed. The Obamas are more loyal to their cronies who were not "on the job" than to the people tasked to protect them from physical harm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC