Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Obama To Meet With Union Leaders To Discuss Cadillac Tax"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 05:45 PM
Original message
"Obama To Meet With Union Leaders To Discuss Cadillac Tax"
Edited on Thu Jan-07-10 05:52 PM by Clio the Leo
Obama To Meet With Union Leaders To Discuss Cadillac Tax
Sam Stein, Updated: 01- 7-10 05:25 PM

President Barack Obama is planning to meet with union leaders in the next few days in order to address their opposition to a proposed tax on high-cost health care plans, multiple sources tell the Huffington Post.

The administration recently indicated that it supports including a tax on so-called Cadillac health care insurance plans as part of final health care negotiations between the House and the Senate. The proposal, while believed to be extremely important in getting health care costs under control, is deeply unpopular in the labor community. Many union members are enrolled under those plans -- having given up salary increases to get the additional health care benefits. Now, they stand to have those benefits taxed.

Hoping to get the excise tax dropped in negotiations, several unions launched a public campaign against the proposal. Included in the effort were implicit vows to not support (though also not oppose) the final bill if the tax is included.

In light of the discontent, the White House reached out to labor leaders, asking to set up a meeting to go over some of the policy and political concerns.

"The president is calling us in to discuss some of the policy differences regarding the excise tax," said a union official. "It should be happening in the next couple of days."

The meeting should be a joint gathering with all the labor leaders and not individual sessions. The list of attendees is not yet final. But leaders of several other major national branches are expected to be there, including AFL-CIO, SEIU, CWA and AFSCME.

It was stressed that the gathering would not be an attempt by the administration to strong-arm unions into dropping their objections, but rather an opportunity to hash out some of the disagreements that they have with the proposal.

The White House did not return a request for comment.

UPDATE: An additional labor source tells the Huffington Post that the meeting will take place on Monday.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/07/obama-to-meet-with-union_n_415088.html


Again, the man cut his political teeth with Union members and LONG before most of us knew about Barack Obama, he was working to improve the lives of IL union members. He KNOWS that they are often the backbone of political organizing among the Democratic party throughout the country. Alienating them would be political suicide. So I find it HARD to believe that he's now pushing something that will screw them over ... add to this the fact that the WH has now initiated a meeting with labor leaders, it makes the whole meme that insurance companies are pushing seem laughable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. So you're accusing unions of being duped by insurance companies now?
Really? That's the meme you're going with?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Of course not. Do you have any thoughts on this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. The EPI has debunked the higher wages claim
Edited on Thu Jan-07-10 06:22 PM by Hello_Kitty
http://epi.3cdn.net/f121df10fab53d2b16_3nm6bhd7e.pdf

That's a big part of the faulty premise the argument for this excise tax rests upon. They are claiming they will raise billions in tax revenues from higher wages when there's no basis for it. It disappoints me to see someone as smart as John Kerry falling for this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. "the whole meme that insurance companies are pushing" -

What "meme" are you referring to?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hvn_nbr_2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. I didn't understand what that statement was trying to say either. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllyCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. Now? He's decided NOW to meet with Unions?
Why does he even care at this point? Why does it matter? The Congress will push this thing through no matter what we think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. His involvement is to stuff it down all our throats
Didn't need to do that til the end. Well he will get his legislative victory. That is the only goal after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
22. More stupid clueless
dissing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #22
29. i've never seen such a pack of bitter, bitter people in my life...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Read the last paragraph of the post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
23. The Clueless Dissers don't care what it says.. but I do..
"Again, the man cut his political teeth with Union members and LONG before most of us knew about Barack Obama, he was working to improve the lives of IL union members. He KNOWS that they are often the backbone of political organizing among the Democratic party throughout the country. Alienating them would be political suicide. So I find it HARD to believe that he's now pushing something that will screw them over ... add to this the fact that the WH has now initiated a meeting with labor leaders, it makes the whole meme that insurance companies are pushing seem laughable."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
21. You don't know all what President Obama has
been doing for this..just more clueless dissing from the uniformed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. K&R. Hopefully it WILL be worked out. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
10. All along, the only things Obama pushed for re. HCR was screwing the average American n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
11. There are very serious issues about the excise tax, and I would hope that Obama will listen and push
Edited on Thu Jan-07-10 06:59 PM by Mass
the Senate to fix them, if this is the solution that will be adopted. (starting by indexing the threshold on healthcare inflation, not inflation, taking into account regional cost of living and company size).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
13. The claim that moving away from high-cost plans means fewer benefits is false
Edited on Thu Jan-07-10 07:21 PM by ProSense
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. The claim that taxing health plans will lead to higher wages is laughable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. No, it's not. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadesofgray Donating Member (350 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
15. I don't find it hard to believe at all. He thinks he can steamroll them the
same way he steamrolled Nancy.

I hope they tell him to piss up a rope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. The reaction of union families to this travesty is what will count!
This is nothing more than a middle class tax increase at a time of economic dislocation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ildem09 Donating Member (472 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. i agree
i know several union folks in Terre Haute that won't be so motivated to keep Indiana in the Blue Column in 2012
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelly1mm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
17. I already told my union that I will exercise my "Beck Rights" if they
support one politician that supports this bill if it contains the Cadillac tax provision and will urge others to do the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Your "beck rights"? What is that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelly1mm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. "Beck Rights" are the ability of union members to get a refund of
Edited on Thu Jan-07-10 11:18 PM by kelly1mm
the portion of their union dues that go to political campaign contributions. It stems from the USSC case Communication Workers v. Beck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #17
26. There are unions that do not make political contributions to candidates
via their treasury. Rather, they rely on voluntary contributions to a PAC.

And using your "Beck Rights" won't necessarily make an impact. Rather than doing that it would probably be more effective to attend and participate in meetings for your local union and AFL-CIO Central Labor Council. If you have a standing committee with the purpose of educating members about legislation in both the local and national level it would provide you with the chance to impact decisions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
24. People catastrophize here on DU, but I don't think the Cadillac tax will be that bad.
Personally, I'd put a few exemptions or breaks into it - raise the threshold where the tax kicks in for older folks, say 50+, because they're gonna be paying more for their insurance under the current legislation.

I'd also cut a break for collectively-negotiated health care plans, or IOW, union plans specifically because unions have negotiated better health care for their members in lieu of higher wages. A union exemption to the Cadillac tax might put an end to this particular fight.

This is already in the Senate bill, IIRC, but I'd also make sure the final legislation has exemptions for workers in high-risk professions, like longshoremen, lumberjacks, crab fishermen...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. There already are higher limits for people over 55 and in high risk professions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
27. I envy union members that at least he appears to want to meet with them, but
I remember what happened after he "met with" proponents of single-payer. As I recall, it was a token "feel good" kind of thing that went absolutely nowhere, even though the vast majority of the country want it. It didn't even lead to inclusion of a "public option" in the final bill.

I'd be wary of anything he says now, because he's shown he doesn't mind lying and saying what people want to hear, insincerely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
28. Good. Never too late, considering the bill is still being tinkered with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC