Tapper cleans up after Stephanopoulos - calls bullshit on Rudy's "no domestic attack" nonsense.

[jefferson_dem]

@PoliticalGiant oh, please. youve got to put on some serious blinders to argue my work is partisan
half a minute ago from mobile web
Reply Retweet excellent point by @gpollowitz -- what about 2002 shooting at El Al at LAX. says he: "never understood why not terrorism"
7 minutes ago from web
Reply Retweet the motives of anthrax killer and Johan Allen Muhammed still unclear, tho jury said Muhammed committed an act of terrorism
16 minutes ago from web
Reply Retweet And of course lets not forget John Allen Muhammed, the Beltway sniper -- 10 people killed, 3 critically injured.
19 minutes ago from web
Reply Retweet @Larry_Kelly That's a new and conveniently narrow definition.
20 minutes ago from web
Reply Retweet Am eager for an explanation. Will reach out for one and get back to you.
21 minutes ago from web
Reply Retweet if he meant the FBI definition -- Americans attacking Americans based on US-based ideology -- also wrong
22 minutes ago from web
Reply Retweet if by "domestic attacks" Giuliani meant "attacks on the homeland," thats wrong, if he meant but forgot to add post-9/11, also wrong...
22 minutes ago from web
Reply Retweet Speaking of domestic attacks, let's not forget the anthrax attacks -- killed 5, injured many others.
24 minutes ago from web
Reply Retweet @psmith867 No, I'm saying it's NOT
25 minutes ago from web
Reply Retweet @AmeriKeith i refer you to my blog http://abcnews.blogs.com for massive evidence of Kool-Aid drinking. and while there, try the decaf.
26 minutes ago from web
Reply Retweet i assumed that's NOT what Giuliani meant, since that definition is really a reference to the likes of the Unabomber
27 minutes ago from web
Reply Retweet so that would not include ANY al Qaeda related attack, including accused Fort Hood shooter Major Nidal Hassan.
28 minutes ago from web
Reply Retweet The FBI's definition of "domestic attack" is: "Americans attacking Americans based on U.S.-based extremist ideology"
29 minutes ago from web
Reply Retweet @donsspencer In many ways I say Amen, brother.
33 minutes ago from web
Reply Retweet As my father always says, tweeps, argue opinions. Don't argue facts.
33 minutes ago from web
Reply Retweet @Larry_Kelly um...wrong. "We had no domestic attacks under Bush. We've had one under Obama."
34 minutes ago from web
Reply Retweet @AmeriKeith friend, again, do a little research before you go off in j'accuse mode. am willing to refrain from blocking. For now.
35 minutes ago from web
Reply Retweet @AmeriKeith You have no idea what youre talking about. Re: terrorist acts (see Reid, Richard), or my campaign coverage. Try Google.
36 minutes ago from web
Reply Retweet @MarkImpomeni u have it backwards:"A misspelling..initially resulted in the State Dept believing he did not have a valid U.S. visa."
39 minutes ago from web
Reply Retweet It also gets at the truly dishonest revisionism that Bush's presidency somehow began on 9/12/2001.
44 minutes ago from web
Reply Retweet Giuliani's comments that there were zero terrorist attacks under Bush, 1 under Obama, is false no matter how you slice it.
44 minutes ago from web

http://twitter.com/jaketapper

[Jennicut]

1. Tapper actually calling out a Rethug?

Is this actually happening? LOL

[Rosa Luxemburg]

2. Oh but Guilliani domlished the WT7 building

[WI_DEM]

3. Yeah, but too bad it's not on the air.

[Raine1967]

4. And yet His blog is still sitting there -- with the lie unchallenged

http://blogs.abcnews.com/george/2010/01/rudy-giuliani-no-domestic-attacks-under-bush-one-under-obama.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

Jakwe needs to have a talk with his co-worker, not just the twitterverse. I am so pissed at this.

[DrToast]

5. Fucking Twitter

I miss the days when you didn't need a decoder ring to follow the news.

[jefferson_dem]

6. Ha.

The new media tools require a really short learning curve but following the news is SO much more easy and efficient once you do. :)

[here_is_to_hope]

7. That shit above isn't news, its one pansy ass twit

talking to another pansy ass twit in some moronic code.
News?
:crazy:

[jefferson_dem]

8. True. You got me.

And the "moronic code" in the OP above represents all the "news" that can be found in the "Twitterverse" (offered with tongue-in-cheek).

Luddite much?

[here_is_to_hope]

14. Get back to me when reading 10k blips of this crap a day

changes anything.
It's just yap yap yap, what the hell do you get from that?
And if you read something 10 minutes before I do, does that change anything?
No, it doesn't.
I don't feel the need to be plugged in to what these fucks are talking about, it is the DNA thing, as in 'does not apply' to anything going on in my life.
Or most lives.

YMMV.

[zulchzulu]

9. Twitter is the 8-Track Tape of the Internet

Fads...

[jefferson_dem]

10. Nah...

I like to think of it more like the macarena. Here today...an embarrassing memory tomorrow.

[msallied]

11. I think you're both wrong. Twitter was revolutionary in terms of how people

communicate, not only mundane shit but news and real-time events. People pay Twitter now for their metric data. There's a lot more that goes on with Twitter than people understand.

[jefferson_dem]

12. Actually... I was only joking.

Should have included this --> :sarcasm:

I'm big into twitter and love the opportunities it provides - for news/information collecting/sharing and global conversation.

[msallied]

13. Woot!

I gotcha now. :-D

Hey, speaking of Woot, I follow them on Twitter! lol

[Cha]

15. ghoul is the one who comes out looking

real bad here.