Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ALERT: General Petraeus is talking about bombing Iran

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-10-10 12:54 PM
Original message
ALERT: General Petraeus is talking about bombing Iran
A President Truman would have fired Petraeus and McChrystal for insubordination

Iran's nuclear facilities 'can be bombed': US commander

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Agence France-Presse | 01/10/2010 9:45 PM

WASHINGTON DC, United States - A top US military commander responsible for the Middle East and the Gulf region said the United States has developed contingency plans to deal with Iran's nuclear facilities, insisting that they "can be bombed."

"Well, they certainly can be bombed," General David Petraeus, head of US Central Command, told CNN television as he commented on suggestions that Iranian nuclear facilities were heavily fortified.

"The level of effect would vary with who it is that carries it out, what ordnance they have, and what capability they can bring to bear," he added.

The network plans to air the interview later Sunday, but has released some excerpts.

Petraeus did not elaborate on the plans, but he said the military has considered the impacts of any action taken there, CNN said.

"It would be almost literally irresponsible if Centcom were not to have been thinking about the various 'what ifs' and to make plans for a whole variety of different contingencies," Petraeus said

http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/world/01/10/10/irans-nuclear-facilities-can-be-bombed-us-commander
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-10-10 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Did he say terrorist enough times? If he did, then he probably will be given
anything he wants..... Another stupid war is being devised...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polly7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-10-10 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. I swear these people are all psychotic. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoSheep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-10-10 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-10-10 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. Can anyone say "Universal Draft IMMEDIATELY After Iran is Bombed?"
That folks is truly when "the balloon goes up" and "the gates of Hell are swung open" on the World.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-10-10 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. You have a lot more faith in the U.S. government than I do.
I don't believe reducing civil rights will stop, or even slow, any war effort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-10-10 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. These DAMN Generals never meet a war they didn't like
they LOVE war because they get big bucks like COMBAT pay which for a General is a nice piece of change. A four star General is payed almost 10,000.00 a month
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-10-10 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. I am troubled about Petraeus downplaying of the blowback to our troops still in Iraq
were we to bomb Shia Iran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 06:45 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. Not quite
combat pay is the same for all ranks. In 2009 that was $225.00 per month. If in a combat zone for at least one day. The big reward is pay is tax free in a combat zone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
winyanstaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-10-10 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. Can we say World War 3 boys and girls?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-10-10 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
9. So, this is all about "what ifs"?
We have contingency plans to invade, bomb, attack just about every country and/or respond to attacks on us. That doesn't mean that military action is imminent and I can't think of any particular reason that President Obama would be seriously contemplating military action. President Obama (not that he seems to be trusted much here anymore but still....) has not announced any plans to attack Yemen or Somalia and I haven't heard him make any noises about Iran either. So, what exactly is everybody flipping out about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
11. I think you are overinterpreting
Edited on Mon Jan-11-10 07:21 AM by Teaser
Anything can, indeed, be bombed. Petraeus then notes that whether or not the bombing is effective depends on multiple factors. That is also true.

Blowing shit up is his job. It is the job of anyone in the military: to blow shit up and not get blown up yourself, if possible.

That he should think in these terms is unsurprising.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
12. Back in the late 20's, the US had plans in place to invade Canada.
It's what the military does. Canada, interestingly enough, had their own plans on attacking the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. The Canadian plan for a pre-emptive invasion of the United States.
Defence Scheme No. 1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defence_Scheme_No._1

War Plan Red was name of the US plan for an invasion of Canada.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC