brentspeak
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-10-10 03:55 PM
Original message |
How much worse will this HCR bill get? |
|
Edited on Sun Jan-10-10 04:03 PM by brentspeak
First, the public option was reduced to only a ~5%-of-the-population-eligible public option.
Then, even that was discarded.
Then (or actually, at the same time), a universal individual mandate to purchase private health insurance was included.
Then (or actually before anyone knew it), Obama made a secret deal with Big Pharma to disallow drug re-imports from Canada.
Then, the talk about revoking the insurance industry's anti-trust exemption was shelved.
Then, an excise tax on so-called "cadillac plans" was inserted.
What's next? What new and wonderful surprises are in store for us from Obama and the House of Lords?
|
Speck Tater
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-10-10 04:03 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Next step: Ordinary citizens don't get any health care, but pay for health care for rich bankers. |
|
Why not? It worked for the bailout, didn't it?
|
Nite Owl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-10-10 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. You might not be far off |
|
if are all mandated to buy insurance and many won't ever be able to use it due to the high deductibles and copays.
|
DrDan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-10-10 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
6. exactly . . . and once the mandates kick in - there is only one way for |
|
the insurance companies to increase profits - quit paying claims.
|
Dinger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-10-10 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
harun
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-10-10 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
grytpype
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-10-10 04:07 PM
Response to Original message |
3. The Manchurian Meanie and his corporatist stooges take the poor man's last nickel... it makes me cry |
Jackpine Radical
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-10-10 04:10 PM
Response to Original message |
4. They're about to add a new provision that gets around the individual risk-factor surcharge. |
|
They'll just work it in reverse. You get a "bonus" that brings your rate "down" (i.e. to where it would have otherwise been anyway) if you don't have hypertension or high cholesterol or overweight or whatever. Get it? Instead of starting out "low" and adding on for risks, they start high and subtract for lower risks.
|
freddie mertz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-10-10 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. Yeah, that's the worst one yet, and it is getting very little play. |
|
It's a back door to bring back pre-existing conditions.
|
nightrain
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-10-10 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
7. I hadn't heard about that.... do you have a link? |
Jackpine Radical
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-10-10 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
nightrain
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-10-10 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
10. thank you. I missed it. more ways for corps to take money from individuals... would you |
|
consider making that an OP?
|
Jackpine Radical
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-10-10 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
16. I think it was posted earlier, actually. |
enlightenment
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-10-10 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
20. Twice over the last 24 hours, actually - it dropped like a rock both times. |
|
Too many words in the OP, I suppose . . .
|
GreenArrow
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-10-10 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
21. Third time's the charm? |
|
I missed it the first two.
|
enlightenment
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-10-10 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
23. One can always hope, eh? |
GreenArrow
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-11-10 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #23 |
24. Thank you, I'll check that out. |
Captain Hilts
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-10-10 05:03 PM
Response to Original message |
11. The health ins. industry has maintained its anti-trust exemption. nt |
Blasphemer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-10-10 05:18 PM
Response to Original message |
12. I am afraid that we will soon find out |
|
It's going to be huge mess and if they are willing to create legislation that bad, then they don't care about their political futures. If the health insurance industry has that much of a hold on them, then I have to believe that reform was never the intention. Every time someone writes a rosy article talking about something good that is in the bill, it is stripped out.
|
girl gone mad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-11-10 06:02 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
33. I'm of two minds on that. |
|
Most of the bad provisions don't go into effect until 2013 so perhaps they do care about their political futures.
On the other hand, so many of the moves they've made lead me to believe that they aren't counting on a second term.
|
Lydia Leftcoast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-10-10 05:22 PM
Response to Original message |
13. Once people find out how much shit the few helpful pieces of this bill are wrapped in |
|
the Republicans will jump up and say gleefully, "We were against it all the time!"
I say scrap it and start over. Pass the good parts separately without the mandate--unless there is a public option available to every American without exception.
|
niyad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-10-10 06:09 PM
Response to Original message |
rug
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-10-10 06:16 PM
Response to Original message |
15. There's a robust debate on whether they can levy a lien on your kidney until the bill is paid. |
|
The President has stated he will veto any bill with that provision.
|
Jackpine Radical
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-10-10 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
17. No, no, I think that was for livers. |
|
People have two kidneys, so it's OK to put a lien on one of them.
|
Jackpine Radical
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-10-10 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
18. What are you talking about? This is the best of all possible worlds. |
|
DR. PANGLOSS Let us review Lesson eleven!
STUDENTS: Paragraph two Axiom seven
PANGLOSS: Once one dismisses The rest of all possible worlds One finds that this is The best of all possible worlds!
STUDENTS: Once one dismisses The rest of all possible worlds One finds that this is The best of all possible worlds!
PANGLOSS: Pray classify Pigeons and camels
MAXIMILLIAN: Pigeons can fly!
PAQUETTE: Camels are mammals!
PANGLOSS: There is a reason For everything under the sun!
CANDIDE: There is a reason For everything under the sun!
MAXIMILLIAN: Objection! What about snakes?
PANGLOSS: Snakes! 'Twas snake that tempted mother Eve Because of snake we now believe That though depraved We can be saved >From hellfire and damnation (Because of snake's temptation!)
If snake had not seduced our lot And primed us for salvation Jehova could not pardon all The sins that we call cardinal Involving bed and bottle!
ALL Now onto Aristotle!
PANGLOSS Mankind is one All men are brothers!
STUDENTS: As you'd have done Do unto others!
PANGLOSS It's understood in This best of all possible worlds--
MAXIMILLIAN All's for the good in This best of all possible worlds!
CANDIDE: Objection! What about war?
PANGLOSS: War! Though war may seem a bloody curse It is a blessing in reverse When canon roar Both rich and poor By danger are united! (Till every wrong is righted!)
Philosophers make evident The point that I have cited 'Tis war makes equal -- as it were -- The noble and the commoner Thus war improves relations!
ALL: Now onto conjugations!
PANGLOSS: Amo, amas, Amat, amamus!
STUDENTS: Amo, amas, Amat, amamus!
PANGLOSS: Proving that this is The best of all possible worlds With love and kisses The best of all possible worlds!
STUDENTS: Proving that this is The best of all possible worlds With love and kisses The best of all possible worlds!
PANGLOSS Quod erat demunstrandum! QED! Amo, amas, Amat amamus!
MAXIMILLIAN: (overlapping) Quod erat demunstrandum! QED! Amo, amas! Quod erat demunstrandum!
|
neverforget
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-10-10 11:48 PM
Response to Original message |
22. How about the Stupak abortion amendment and the Nelson amendments? |
|
Talk of lowering Medicare age availability but Lieberman killed that.
|
donco6
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-11-10 12:45 AM
Response to Original message |
25. BUT BUT it's just a START! |
|
We had to get the camel's nose in the tent! . . . another tired cliche, . . . wildly unsupported claim . . . YOU'RE JUST RACIST!
We're all so fucked.
|
Skittles
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-11-10 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #25 |
30. KEEP YOUR PANTIES ON, DONCO |
|
HE'S PLAYING CHESS DON'TCHA KNOW
|
donco6
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-11-10 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #30 |
34. Whew! Thanks, I was worried there for a minute. |
|
I feel so much better. :)
|
cherokeeprogressive
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-11-10 01:14 AM
Response to Original message |
26. We won't actually know until AFTER President Obama signs it. |
|
I predict that it will be rushed from the back room to the floors of both houses and passed by a party-line vote on a Tuesday.
Then it will be rushed to the Oval Office on the same day where it will be signed in private before having a huge photo-op signing minutes before President Obama takes the podium for the State of the Union Address.
Once it's over, administration officials will shrug their shoulders and say "what's all the fuss about?" while "liberal angst" over health care reform dies.
Only days after, when it's actually read will we know how bad it is. The day it comes to light, Democratic Senators and Congresspersons will start to crow "I never got the chance to read it fully!" and that will be their attempt at cover before the elections in November.
|
kayla9170
(370 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-11-10 01:21 AM
Response to Original message |
Skittles
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-11-10 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #27 |
TheKentuckian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-11-10 01:25 AM
Response to Original message |
28. Only God knows but if you see something of any worth keep it under the hat |
|
or Lieberman will demand it be deleted.
|
Norrin Radd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-11-10 04:04 AM
Response to Original message |
31. Blood lettings and leeches. |
Goldstein1984
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-11-10 05:49 AM
Response to Original message |
32. They will make it as bad as We the People let them. |
|
Right now, it looks like we'll let them do whatever Wall Street tells them to do.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:13 AM
Response to Original message |