ProSense
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 07:28 PM
Original message |
Poll question: Should health insurance companies be taxed |
|
Edited on Tue Jan-12-10 07:29 PM by ProSense
|
ibegurpard
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 07:31 PM
Response to Original message |
1. they should be abolished |
|
that's my starting point...i'll compromise from there
|
StarfarerBill
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
slipslidingaway
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. knr your reply and the thread because of it :) n/t |
grantcart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. first time I have seen a single reply oblilterate an obnoxious poll |
|
wish I had thought of it.
|
ProSense
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
8. Actually, the poll is doing quite well. n/t |
grantcart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
15. Well its still obnoxious because you aren't really asking about taxing insurance |
|
companies but have a specific question about the excise tax that is contained in the Senate Plan.
21 votes hardly merits a "quite well", but you got spunk.
|
bigwillq
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
16. I think she's just gearing up |
|
for her next thread. Somehow the 21 votes will be used against the "yes" voters. I just hope she blue boxes it. :rofl:
|
ProSense
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
bigwillq
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
highplainsdem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
Hello_Kitty
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
9. I'd like to rec this response and unrec the poll. eom |
IndianaGreen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
10. Health insurance companies provide no value to health care delivery |
|
They interfere with health care delivery by positioning themselves between physicians, their patients, and the treatment and diagnosis.
|
slipslidingaway
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. Exactly, but they do provide returns for investors :( n/t |
Jeff In Milwaukee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-13-10 01:40 PM
Original message |
NOT TRUE! They give out all those free pens! |
|
Which doctors use to write prescriptions that go on to save your life. So just be damned grateful for the American Health Insurance Industry!
...just in case nobody got that
:sarcasm:
|
Diamonique
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
13. I am SO with you there! nt |
BrklynLiberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
14. Great starting point...I agree |
|
Aside from standing between patients and their medical care..what purpose do they serve?
It is profiting from the illnesses of the people.
|
Ganja Ninja
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-13-10 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
This bill is a complete waste of time. As long as for profit companies are involved the system will be gamed again and again.
|
invictus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-14-10 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
90-percent
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 07:41 PM
Response to Original message |
|
They should be stripped of their anti-trust protections from the late forties, enacted at a time when most health insurance companies were non-profit.
-90% Jimmy
|
Posteritatis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 07:54 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Wait, what? They aren't? (nt) |
Oregone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
18. Oh they are, but this poll will be distorted later as support for the idea of an excise tax |
|
Even though the poster totally "forgot" to include any mention of it in the OP.
Pretty much all profitable businesses are taxed (minus a few structures, like S-Corps that just tax the shareholders). Clearly, everyone agrees that profits should be subjected to taxes, as they are (the normal question is: how much taxes). This is normally the context people answer this question in, though itll be used in a totally different context shortly here.
|
Oregone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 08:29 PM
Response to Original message |
17. All profitable corporations should be taxed. Detrimental ones should be banned |
harun
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 11:09 PM
Response to Original message |
20. They should go the way of slavery. |
superduperfarleft
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-13-10 11:05 AM
Response to Original message |
21. They already are. You're being incredibly dishonest. |
ProSense
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-13-10 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
22. I should have included the |
|
Edited on Wed Jan-13-10 01:35 PM by ProSense
the word "more."
So should they be taxed more?
|
Jeff In Milwaukee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-13-10 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
23. The more the merrier, says I....(nt) |
freddie mertz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-13-10 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
25. Dishonest. Fail. You should be ashamed. |
freddie mertz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-13-10 01:40 PM
Response to Original message |
24. Beware folks. This is a dishonest poll, intended to gather fake support for the "Cadillac" tax. |
|
Edited on Wed Jan-13-10 02:13 PM by freddie mertz
Everyone agrees that insurance company PROFITS should be taxed.
But the OPer is trying to trick the unsuspecting into voting for her own very twisted language of support for the employee BENEFIT tax.
A truly disgraceful effort, this.
|
ProSense
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-13-10 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #24 |
26. Damn, you're paranoid. It's a poll on a discussion board. It has absolutely no weight. n/t |
freddie mertz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-13-10 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #26 |
28. It is a distorted, misleading poll question. |
|
You seem to willing to try anything to get support for your roundly rejected opinion on this subject.
|
TheKentuckian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-13-10 01:45 PM
Response to Original message |
27. Other: Abolished, heavily controlled as a public trust, competed against |
|
or at the very least subject to rigorous oversight and regulation.
Certainly no instrument should be used where the end and desired result is reduction of benefits and shifting of more costs to the consumer.
|
Flaneur
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-13-10 02:03 PM
Response to Original message |
29. No, they are parasites that should be exterminated. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:20 PM
Response to Original message |