johnaries
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-16-10 06:51 PM
Original message |
If I could vote for Harold Ford, Jr., then you can vote for Coakley. |
|
I supported Rosalind Kurita in the primary. Ford Jr. was anti-choice (at least back then), his father was being investigated for taking bribes, everything about Ford Jr. screamed DINO. Yet, he was running against Bob Fucking Corker. So you bet your ass I held my nose and voted for Ford.
I know a lot of folks here don't like Coakley. But do you really want Brown?
|
ShortnFiery
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-16-10 06:55 PM
Response to Original message |
1. That's exactly what people said about Deeds over McDonnell in the VA governor's race. |
|
It didn't do any good either. :(
If you don't STAND FOR SOMETHING, you'll fall for anything.
Not only are the democrats demoralized, the independents are unimpressed. Might as well vote for the true corporate right wing instead of the NEW (democrat?) ONE?
|
johnaries
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-16-10 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. Oh, I stand for a lot of things and I resent you insinuating that |
|
I don't. One of the things I stand for is making actual progress whenever possible. I also stand for using reason instead of knee-jerk reactons. I also stand for looking at ALL the facts available and not jumping to conclusions.
Not all of the Democrats are demoralized, and many independents are VERY impressed. Count me as one. I am registered as Independent but because I am a Progressive I vote Democratic.
There is a small but very vocal minority who are misinformed and think with their emotions. But they do not represent a majority of Progressives and Liberals. They just yell loudly.
|
Drunken Irishman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-16-10 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. That's just bullshit, tho. |
|
There have been many Democrats who stood for something and got their butts kicked in an election. That phrase is narrow and doesn't take into account politics, climate and population.
Hell - my representative, a Democrat, makes Coakely look like a goddamn socialist.
And he keeps winning and winning. :eyes:
|
shadesofgray
(350 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-16-10 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
8. I actually voted for Deeds. It disgusted me so much I swore I would never |
|
vote for such a loser ever again.
|
WhiteTara
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-16-10 06:57 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I applaud you...I know he was an ass |
|
and in a way, great he didn't get in...he's a smarmy liar.
|
TheWraith
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-16-10 07:44 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Ford has since proven exactly how much of an ass he is, but still, you did the right thing.
|
xchrom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-16-10 07:59 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Whores will lay down for anything? Nt |
shadesofgray
(350 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-16-10 11:09 PM
Response to Original message |
7. I would NEVER have voted for Ford. If Coakley is anti-choice, I |
|
wouln't vote for her either!
|
quiller4
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-17-10 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
10. Coakley isn't anti-choice. She might be polling better if she were |
|
because there are a great many blue collar Catholics whose votes she needs. They can accept someone who talks about reducing the need for abortion while preserving a woman's right to choose but her strong pro-choice position may persuade some to stay home.
|
IndianaGreen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-16-10 11:18 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Ford is a raging homophobe and is anti-choice, don't dump him next to Coakley! |
|
I would never vote for a homophobe or for someone opposed to reproductive rights, and I don't care if he is running against Satan.
|
Blasphemer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-17-10 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
16. I agree... I don't really get the reaction to Coakley |
|
I know some people preferred Capuano but she's not a bad candidate. There seem to be personality issues coming into play but I don't see how they outweigh Brown's raging wing-nuttery.
|
Radical Activist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-17-10 03:17 AM
Response to Original message |
11. Don't oppose Lieberman in the primary! |
|
He's still better than a Republican! We need our majority!
...oops
|
JI7
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-17-10 03:24 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
12. Lieberman lost the primary |
Radical Activist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-17-10 03:30 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
|
the arguments made during the primary that we'd be better off with him than with a Republican turned out to be incorrect. A moderate Republican would probably have voted for the public option and climate change bills in order to keep his seat. Lieberman has caused more damage than any Republican could.
|
JI7
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-17-10 03:36 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
14. well,he still lost and he is still there. the question to ask is why did Lamont lose ? |
|
Edited on Sun Jan-17-10 03:37 AM by JI7
yes, i know Republicans voted for Lieberman. but it's still a Democratic state. and which moderate Republican in that race would have voted for public option ?
|
IndianaGreen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-17-10 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
17. Lamont lost because the Israel Lobby went to bat for 'Israel's best friend in the Senate' |
|
and that's what it was said about Lieberman.
|
johnaries
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-17-10 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
15. Nope. The Repubulicans are forced to vote NO on everything. |
|
Edited on Sun Jan-17-10 11:15 AM by johnaries
The RNC has a very tight rein on them.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:17 AM
Response to Original message |