Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama in Boston: Was it enough to turn Senate race for Coakley?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
andym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 12:12 AM
Original message
Obama in Boston: Was it enough to turn Senate race for Coakley?
Edited on Mon Jan-18-10 12:13 AM by andym
By Tracey D. Samuelson Correspondent / January 17, 2010
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2010/0117/Obama-in-Boston-Was-it-enough-to-turn-Senate-race-for-Coakley

With only two days left in the race for Massachusetts' open US Senate seat, President Obama delivered exactly what Democratic candidate Martha Coakley was hoping for: the potential for a momentum shift. In recent weeks, Republican Scott Brown had turned the race toward the economic issues that are angering so many voters: high unemployment numbers, worries about healthcare reform, and the soaring federal deficit.

....

Led by Obama Sunday, Ms. Coakley tried to turn the voters' anger on its head. The frustration was justified, they said, but it was misplaced. “We have had one year to make up for eight,” a dressed down Obama told the crowd, referencing the eight years of the Bush administration. “It hasn’t been quick, it hasn’t been easy.... But we’ve begun to deliver on the change you voted for.” It was his exhortation to motivate Democrats and independents with sour memories of the Bush years: “We don’t want to go backwards to the policies that got us into this mess in the first place,” he said.

......

(about the President's visit)
“It let me know how serious it is,” says Jeremy Smith, a graduate student at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge. Mr. Smith wasn’t planning to vote before Obama’s visit but says that now, even though he wasn’t able to make it into the rally, he plans to cast a ballot for Coakley on Tuesday. “Living in a heavily blue state, you can lose sight of the fact that your vote matters,” said Smith, who volunteered for Obama’s presidential campaign. “If it wasn’t serious to Obama’s agenda, he wouldn’t have come.”

Steve Moran works in the health insurance industry and said he was also undecided before Sunday’s rally. “I hadn’t made a clear choice,” he said. But after attending the rally, he said he will likely vote for Coakley. “It’s important enough to bring the president here,” he explained.

--------------------------
Looks like Obama's visit may have helped at least by the testimonials in this article
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
smalll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. Um, "Steve Moran works in the health insurance industry..."
"Steve Moran works in the health insurance industry and said he was also undecided before Sunday’s rally. “I hadn’t made a clear choice,” he said. But after attending the rally, he said he will likely vote for Coakley. “It’s important enough to bring the president here,” he explained."

Do they think we're all morans?

Sayin'!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I noticed that too (ironic isn't it)
Edited on Mon Jan-18-10 12:22 AM by andym
Strange that he wasn't sure who to vote for before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mplo Donating Member (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
3. A bit of irony there;
This:

“We don’t want to go backwards to the policies that got us into this mess in the first place,”" he said."

is rather ironic, given the fact that Obama appointed people to his cabinet who got us into the mess we're presently dealing with in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frazzled Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. No, your buddies Bush and Cheney got us into this mess
No further explanation needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mplo Donating Member (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. I disagree with you, frazzled.
The fact is that Obama appointed people from the Clinton Administration who helped pave the way for Bush and Cheney. So, yes, a number of Obama's appointees did get us into this mess, and that's not a myth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. What is rather ironic is that you are here posting instead of there.....
Actually, even saying Geithner got us into this is more of a myth
than the actual truth of the matter.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Notice this person admits they did not vote for Obama
So hopefully he/she will at least have the decency not to pretend to be a disillusioned supporter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mplo Donating Member (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Okay, so I admit to not having voted the Obama/Biden ticket. So what?
I'm not pretending to be anything, and I reserve the right to put down the reasons why I refused to vote for him.

If I'm negative, it's because I saw this whole thing coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aramchek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. thanks for admitting that you are a Repuke, now no one needs pay you any mind
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mplo Donating Member (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 02:24 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Thanks for your accusations, Aramchek.
I don't need to pay you any mind, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mplo Donating Member (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. I disagree, FrenchieCat.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Well you disagreeing doesn't mean a god damn hting.
especially since your reasons don't make any fucking sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 01:26 AM
Response to Original message
10. I guess we'll know Tuesday evening, and not a minute before. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC