Armstead
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-18-10 07:37 PM
Original message |
The US - Fucking Chamber of Commerce is running ads for Brown |
|
Taling about how Brown is a business friendly candidate.
They've always been scum, but never quite this blatent.
And is this even legal for them to do?
|
butterfly77
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-18-10 07:38 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I posted something a few months ago about these bastards.. |
|
they run on Scarborough and cry about what the President is doing to hurt these poor rich bastards..
|
GCP
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-18-10 07:40 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I hope the good folks of Massachusetts notice that |
Armstead
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-18-10 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. The ad kind of washed over me in the background until I heard that |
|
I figured it was one of his own campaign ads...Then when heard that I went "Whoah"
|
Cha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 12:07 AM
Response to Original message |
depakid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 12:29 AM
Response to Original message |
5. "And is this even legal for them to do?" |
|
Not sure- but it may well be that the US Supreme Court is about to make sure that not only that but MUCH WORSE will be the norm in America soon.
As to the Chamber- these people are nothing more than a bunch of racketeers, who ought to be under scrutiny of the Justice Department.
|
WCGreen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. They have a PAC and it is the US Chamber of Commerce PAC that is |
niceypoo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 12:35 AM
Response to Original message |
7. Chamber are a bunch of RW asshats |
Zoeisright
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 12:49 AM
Response to Original message |
8. The C of C is pure, unadulterated scum. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:17 PM
Response to Original message |