Clio the Leo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 08:59 PM
Original message |
***Mass Senate Special Election - Results Thread #2*** |
Clio the Leo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 08:59 PM
Response to Original message |
1. More than halfway counted. 52% in. Brown 52.5, Coakley 46.5. |
Clio the Leo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 08:59 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Boston update: 21% in. Coakley 58, Brown 40. Not enough. |
Obamacare
(99 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
Coakley needs to at least hit 50%, come on Boston, don't let us down!!!
|
CBR
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
6. On Boston.gov it is 61.6% - 37.3% with 37% reporting. Still not |
|
going to pull it out for her. :(
|
Clio the Leo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:01 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Liberal Northamptoncame through for Coakley: she needed 76%, she got 79%, but not enough overall |
|
http://twitter.com/Dave_Wasserman/status/7969394927Liberal Northampton (in the Western MA Maddow Belt) came through for Coakley: she needed 76%, she got 79%, but not enough overall
|
DrToast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:01 PM
Response to Original message |
Clio the Leo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:02 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Brown lead now near 78K votes... |
ChairmanAgnostic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
10. I just read TPM's review of her campaign. Ugh. |
|
What a fucking mess. What an ignorant. . . . never mind. And what a complete failure by the White house, losing contact or interest in a critical seat, at the worst possible time.
We need new leadership in the D party. The current crowd was lucky, and now their true stripes are visible. They show just how incompetent they are.
|
blitzburgh55
(320 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
|
"theory among Dems is that Coakley needs to carry Boston by 25+ points (and probably more)..."
Is this true? If so, right now she's up
MARTHA COAKLEY DEM 42138 64.00% SCOTT P. BROWN REP 22965 34.88%
|
ChicagoSuz219
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:04 PM
Response to Original message |
8. If this is a special election... |
|
...how long would the person serve before having to run again?
|
ChairmanAgnostic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
ChicagoSuz219
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
|
...this should make Lieberman pretty much irrelevant now.
|
ChairmanAgnostic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-20-10 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #51 |
53. Why Rahm and others made him relevant in the 1st place, I do not understand |
|
We just had a huge house and a decent senate lead, with an incredibly popular president.
talk about squandering the lead.
|
Clio the Leo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:04 PM
Response to Original message |
9. 60% in. Brown 53, Coakley 46. |
Clio the Leo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:05 PM
Response to Original message |
11. 62-37 Coakley in Boston. |
Sanity Claws
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
13. I can't get Boston. com to load |
|
Sounds like it's overwhelmed.
|
FVZA_Colonel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
19. The TPM return list seems a bit out of date compared to what's being posted here. |
FVZA_Colonel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
14. Unfortunately, I don't think that'll be enough at this point. |
|
Here's hoping Democrats can get a health bill passed before MA is legally required to be sworn in.
|
RoccoR5955
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
18. The election has yet to be certified, and with reported voting irregularities... |
|
this could take quite some time.
|
Clio the Leo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:06 PM
Response to Original message |
15. 63% in, Brown 53, Coakley 46. |
Clio the Leo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:08 PM
Response to Original message |
17. Nate: "At this point, forget the projections" |
|
"At this point, forget the projections -- Coakley just has a fair # of raw votes she'd need to make up." http://twitter.com/fivethirtyeight/status/7969628451Unfortunately, I dont know what he means by that.
|
senseandsensibility
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
21. Norah on MSNBC just said |
|
that Brown's camp is no longer expecting a "blowout" and that this could be close.
|
RoccoR5955
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
22. What Nate means is that |
|
Coakley has a fair amount of votes in places where she needed to make up votes to win, so forget any projections or polls.
|
blitzburgh55
(320 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
23. She's up 27% in Boston with 44% in n/t |
NYC Liberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
28. Now up 32% with 53% in. nt |
krawhitham
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
29. she is down 90,000 votes |
krawhitham
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
43. WBZ-TV projects Brown the winner |
Clio the Leo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:10 PM
Response to Original message |
20. 66% in. Brown 53, Coakley 46. |
Clio the Leo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:11 PM
Response to Original message |
24. Coakley up 27 pts in Boston with 47% in. |
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #24 |
26. Howard Dean just said if the results so far do NOT include Boston, Coakley's in good shape! |
RoccoR5955
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #26 |
33. As of this minute... City of Boston Unofficial Results are |
|
SENATOR IN CONGRESS Total Number of Precincts 254 Precincts Reporting 135 53.1 % Total Votes 72446 Number of Uncast Votes 8 MARTHA COAKLEY DEM 47475 65.53% SCOTT P. BROWN REP 24152 33.34% JOSEPH L. KENNEDY LIB 728 1.00% Write-in Votes 91 0.13%
|
Clio the Leo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #26 |
35. It includes half of Boston. NT |
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #35 |
38. Oh. So half of Boston IS in? Oh, well. Maybe they're not Coakley districts. |
Mass
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #26 |
39. Several major towns which are democratic strongholds are missing or incomplete. |
|
I am not sure if this will be enough though.
|
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #39 |
42. Well, at least there's a sliver of hope then. |
Mass
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #42 |
46. Turnout seem very low - 31 % in Springfield. |
Clio the Leo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:12 PM
Response to Original message |
25. Coakley manages to carry her own home town... |
Mass
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
31. Not really a surprise, |
Kdillard
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:13 PM
Response to Original message |
27. Sigh. Is there any way this can turn around? |
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #27 |
34. See my post #26 right above re: Howard Dean. |
|
Edited on Tue Jan-19-10 09:16 PM by jenmito
|
RoccoR5955
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #27 |
36. As Yogi Berra said... |
|
"It ain't over till it's over." There's a long way to go yet.
|
Odin2005
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:14 PM
Response to Original message |
Clio the Leo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:14 PM
Response to Original message |
32. 66% of the Commonwealth reporting 53% 46% BROWN |
Clio the Leo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:16 PM
Response to Original message |
37. 69% in. 53 Brown, 46 Coakley. |
FVZA_Colonel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:18 PM
Response to Original message |
40. Coakely Concedes (according to Brown aide) |
|
Edited on Tue Jan-19-10 09:19 PM by FVZA_Colonel
9:13 p.m. -- Coakley has conceded in a call to Scott Brown, according to a Brown aide. http://www.boston.com/news/local/breaking_news/2010/01/live_coverage_o.html
|
Sanity Claws
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #40 |
|
What's the hurry? The counting is not even done.
|
FVZA_Colonel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #44 |
45. Boston.com has the lead at 102,000 some votes for Brown. |
|
Unless Boston really comes in for Coakely...
|
Clio the Leo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:18 PM
Response to Original message |
41. Cilizza is reporting that Coakley has conceeded |
|
Edited on Tue Jan-19-10 09:19 PM by Clio the Leo
http://twitter.com/TheHyperFix/status/7969988570and he knows what he's talking about .... other sources are as well
|
Kdillard
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #41 |
47. Sucks. I guess she realizes she doesn't have the votes to make up the difference. I |
high density
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:24 PM
Response to Original message |
48. The press is going to enjoy this for the next week |
|
"Democrats are crashing and burning-- lose liberal Massachusetts vote!"
|
Clio the Leo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 10:05 PM
Response to Original message |
49. for crying out loud! Even her concession speech sucked! NT |
Clio the Leo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 10:41 PM
Response to Original message |
50. well was that his first gaffe? |
|
Telling the world that his daughters were available?
|
Kdillard
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #50 |
52. Sigh. Hopefully the people of MA will wake up and this clown |
|
Will only serve one term.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:17 AM
Response to Original message |