I looked at some tables on Boston.com and compared turnout between areas that Obama carried and areas that McCain carried. I used these tables:
Best and Worst cities for Obama and McCain
http://www.boston.com/news/politics/2008/election_results/top_bottom_town_president/2008 results per town
http://www.boston.com/news/politics/2008/election_results/ma_president/2010 results per town
http://www.boston.com/news/special/politics/2010/senate/results.htmlI took the 10 best cities for Obama and the best 10 cities for McCain and I compared the turnout between 2008 and 2010 for those 20 areas. From that data I created this spread sheet (so you can check the math):
http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=tcsexGxY6hbueD_HbEYzdMA&output=htmlOne city, Aquinnah, was the best city for Obama in 2008 but was not listed in the 2010 table so actually I compared the remaining 9 best Obama cities to the 10 best McCain cities.
Here's what I found for the 2 sets of cities in 2008:
Obama cities: 81.37% <= turnout winner
McCain cities: 78.40%
Here's what I found for the same 2 sets of cities in 2010:
Obama cities: 59.00%
McCain cities: 61.40% <= turnout winner
Turnout understandably falls in off year election but it appears Obama leaning voters were more likely to stay home than McCain voters this time around.
One caveat - I could not find a direct listing of the 2010 turnout per city so I calculated it by comparing the vote totals between 2008 and 2010. Therefore I'm not taking into account population shifts in the intervening 14 months.