"I didn't vote for a party that would abandon my agenda because it lost one seat in the Senate"

[CreekDog]

Ezra Klein quotes some messages he's been getting:

"The party I voted for, and want to be part of, would recognize political opportunity in the waning days of its supermajority and pass what it could pass, and then keep coming back for more."

"I've voted for Democrats all my life. I've campaigned for and donated to the Democratic Party. But if they say they can't or won't go any further on health care because they only have 59 votes in the Senate, they deserve to lose."

And then Klein continues:

The loss in Massachusetts was a terrible disappointment to Democrats. But it can be explained away. Martha Coakley was a terrible candidate. Scott Brown ran an excellent campaign. These things happen.

But the reaction congressional Democrats have had to Coakley's loss has been much more shattering. It has been a betrayal.

...

The fundamental pact between a political party and its supporters is that the two groups believe the same thing and pledge to work on it together. And the Democratic base feels that it has held to its side of the bargain. It elected a Democratic majority and a Democratic president. It swallowed tough compromises on the issues it cared about most. It swallowed concessions to politicians it didn't like and industry groups it loathed. But it persisted. Because these things are important. That's why those voters believe in them. That's why they're Democrats.

But the party looks ready to abandon them because Brown won a special election in Massachusetts -- even though Democrats can pass the bill after Brown is seated. What that says is crucial: Whereas the base thought it was making these hard compromises and getting up early to knock on doors because these issues are important, the party thought all that was happening because, well, it's hard to say. It was electorally convenient? People need something to do? Ted Kennedy wanted it done?

...

If the Democratic Party won't uphold its end of the bargain, there's no reason its base should pretend the deal is still on.

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2010/01/demoralized_democrats.html

[Cha]

1. Exactly..and

brown worked for his campaign but will he work for the People of Mass or the teabag party of No?

So many Epitaphs for Health Care Reform now..we'll see.

[CreekDog]

3. Why are we trying to convince Scott Brown?

When it seems like we can't even get mainstream Democrats in congress to commit to making some of these things happen, or at least make some of them happen.

[Cha]

4. Not trying to convince brown..

just saying that he won't be working for the people of Mass..because your OP mentioned how hard he worked for the win(excellent campaign).

I'm an optimist here..I think it's going to be get passed somehow someway.

[Cleita]

2. Well Ezra, maybe you did. I don't think they are going to change their

spots overnight. Time will tell.

[Armstead]

5. How ablout putting in a public insurance or Medicare buy in back into this stinking bill then Erza?

Stupid jerk. You cheerlead this bill as the things people wanted were stripped away to the dismay of those voters -- NOW you suddenly say they keep their end of the "bargain"?

Where the fuck were you two or three months ago?

Bullshit.