Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So if Justice Stevens decides to retire after this term, will the Rethugs go for filibuster

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Hawaii Hiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 10:08 PM
Original message
So if Justice Stevens decides to retire after this term, will the Rethugs go for filibuster
Face it, if Justice Stevens decides to retire after this term, the Republicans won't be happy with A.N.Y. nominee President Obama makes unless it's Robert Wacko Bork...

Now that its 59-41, you know they'll at least threaten a filibuster...

This is something to be on the look out for as though the Supreme Court term doesn't end until late June, IF Justice Stevens does retire (and some were speculating that based on him not hiring any clerks for the fall term) an announcement COULD come in April/May?....

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/02/justice-stevens-may-retir_n_274827.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Does the sun rise in the East?
Seriously.

These are the Republicans we're talking about.

Anybody left of Alito will be filibustered.

And the Dems will let 'em stand back and do it.

Don't you get it yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawaii Hiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It was my rhetoricial question for the day
That's my fear that the Democrats will cave in what will be an EXTREMELY important nomination....

Orange bang head time, :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. double duh
but have no fear, the Obama administration will start out by offering up a fully compromised choice , pre-negotiating with key repugnants for an acceptably rightwing nominee, who will then be rejected by these same repugnants and joe lieberman as too librul.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Is that what happened last time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. Is that what you think of Sonia Sotomayor?
I don't. I think she's a wise Latina.

Hekate

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. Ya think?
That would be a big, fat HELL YES.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. Not sure they could hold their conference of asshats together on a judicial appointment filibuster.
The two Maine ladies, and Lindsey Graham (seriously), might bail on them at that point.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. I say that Obama nominates the best judge possible and FORCES them to filibuster

Make them do the spectacle.



Everything Obama does from here on out has to be bold.


Put a name out there, and force the Repukes to kill the nomination.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidpdx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. What I would rather see is that fucktard
Scalia drop dead while having breakfast. He and Thomas represent the most Conservative faction of the court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Thomas wouldn't know what to do with himself without Scalia, would he? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidpdx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 03:44 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Thomas would be left beating himself in the corner
Those two are a match made in hell.

Anyone that reads this, pick up the book The Nine by Jeffery Toobin. I highly recommend it. It made me realize what a total ass those two are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
9. Only if they wan to play partician politics. Obama's picks so far have been left to center.
No one extreme, like Borke who the Republicans tryed to push through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 02:46 AM
Response to Original message
12. They are not stupid enough to do that.
If they did, then they could be sure that the next time they control the White House the Dems would filibuster their Supreme Court nominations too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cosmocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #12
18. Is this post meant to be humorous ...
They could givew a rats tail about what the dems might do the next time ... They will go to the wall on this one, and find some innate talking point that the MSM will carry water on that will rationalize why it will be different if the dems do it ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 05:18 AM
Response to Original message
14. It would create too many campaign ads
Their views on Presidents getting to pick SC judges are all on video. It's the one thing I think the press would actually bury them on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 05:49 AM
Response to Original message
15. They'll probably reluctantly play ball on at least the SC
Lieberfool as usual is who I expect to be a real ass with bogus terra concerns.

If Obama pushes his school privatization scheme we'll see PLENTY O' BIPARTISANSHIP there, Jeb and everybody will be on deck for that mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
secondwind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 07:01 AM
Response to Original message
16. Supreme Court nominees usually don't share the same "fate" as legislation. The Republicans


will play ball, and ONLY oppose if the person is outrageously one-sided. They almost never are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawaii Hiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. I think you make a good point...Also consider
Ailito & Roberts got their up or down vote, so did Thomas & Scalia....Even a radical like Bork got his vote, he just was defeated, hell 6 Republicans voted against confirming Bork incl. John Warner (R-VA)...

I just hope if Stevens does decide to step down after the June term, President Obama does NOT say "Well, let's wait until the Nov. elections are over before i make a selection to replace Justice Stevens"...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC