Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Policy Pivot on Banks Followed Months of Wrangling

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 01:29 AM
Original message
Policy Pivot on Banks Followed Months of Wrangling
Policy Pivot on Banks Followed Months of Wrangling
Former Fed Chairman Volcker, With Backing From Biden and Axelrod, Helped Shape Obama's Tougher Stance on Banks:

For nearly a year, President Barack Obama's economic team resisted measures to restrict the size and activities of the biggest U.S. banks. Two days after Democrats suffered a devastating election loss in Massachusetts, the White House rolled out a proposal to do just that.

The policy's evolution took months, according to congressional and administration officials. Prompted by the cajoling of former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker and other respected voices, dissenters in the administration—notably Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and White House economics chief Lawrence Summers—gradually dropped their opposition.

On Jan. 13, Messrs. Geithner and Summers locked down the final regulatory proposals into a memo to the president that they said was unanimous.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704423204575017543560874692.html?mod=WSJ_Markets_MIDDLETopNews

Interesting tidbits:

According to Senate officials, the president had an ally beyond Mr. Volcker. One of Mr. Obama's top political advisers, David Axelrod, was also pressing to get tougher on the big banks. In addition, Vice President Joe Biden emerged as a key Volcker ally.

"Biden and Volcker are old friends," said Austan Goolsbee, a member of the White House's Council of Economic Advisers. The vice president "became a leading advocate."

And this:

Treasury officials feared headlines would blare that Mr. Geithner had backed breaking up the banks. But the president continued to endure criticism, in particular from his left, that he was coddling Wall Street. In talks with his financial team, Mr. Obama started letting his frustration show, asking why he was on the wrong side of the "too big to fail" debate.



Volcker has some big time allies in the WH and I hope the President gets it now. He has to be on correct side of the too big to fail debate to save his Presidency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 01:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. Again, I applaud Obama for listening to the voices of reason. Although this
probably took too long (a year!) he finally made the right decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. He made a mistake listening to Geithner.
I think he has finally realized that. I bet Geithner does not last another year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I initially thought Geithner wasn't even at the announcement, but I just
saw another pic showing he was. It got my hopes up that he was back at the WH packing his bags, but I guess not. If he's gone in a year, I'll be happy. If it's sooner than that, I'll be downright giddy.

I hope Obama sees quick results from this decision, and a rise in his support, and continues to listen to others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 02:00 AM
Response to Original message
4. Whoa -- I just re-read this:
"Treasury officials feared headlines would blare that Mr. Geithner had backed breaking up the banks."

Why would they fear that headline? Do they want Wall Street to feel secure with their "representatives" in the WH? :grr:

And, a hats-off to Alelrod, too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatSeg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 04:13 AM
Response to Original message
5. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 04:18 AM
Response to Original message
6. K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
7. GREAT Good news!
How 'right' we've been!

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 03:12 AM
Response to Original message
8. More of this please
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burning rain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 04:22 AM
Response to Original message
9. Good time for the WH to roll out this new policy.
He can talk populist to "the folks," and claim at one and the same time he can't pass anything because Democrats only have 59 votes in the Senate. "The folks" are mollified; the bankers are happy; it's a win-win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Impedimentus Donating Member (84 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
10. A few more tongue lashings and the big banks will be ...
Edited on Sat Jan-23-10 02:47 PM by Impedimentus
... cowering in the corner of the room, frightened to death that their bonuses will only go up by 50% next year.

As for the tens of thousands of middle class and poor American families that are losing their homes,their jobs, going into bankruptcy, dying because they don't have health insurance, seeing their world fall apart, well, times are tough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
impik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
11. The president should go back listening to his instincts
His instincts proved right again and again during the campaign and should go back listen to them. There's no reason that he'll find himself in this situation:

"In talks with his financial team, Mr. Obama started letting his frustration show, asking why he was on the wrong side of the "too big to fail" debate".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 03:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC