Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

For all of you not watching Obama's first SOTU tonight...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 07:35 PM
Original message
For all of you not watching Obama's first SOTU tonight...
Edited on Wed Jan-27-10 07:36 PM by jenmito
SHAME ON YOU! That's all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh yeah.
Like shame is going to work on those people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. It won't...
but I just wanted to say it anyway. How sad that DEMOCRATS are declaring they don't want to watch Obama's first SOTU address.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. It's okay..less
bitching then..they bitch about what they didn't see, can they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. To those claiming this is Obama's FIRST SOTU. Please
Stop.

It is his second.

I already watched his first.

(and enjoyed it)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. It IS his first. Last Feb. was a speech to a Joint Session of Congress but NOT
Edited on Wed Jan-27-10 07:52 PM by jenmito
a SOTU speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. So who gave the 2009 SOTU address, required by the constitutuion?
"(The President) shall from time to time give to the Congress Information on the State of the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient...." Article II, Sec. 3, U.S. Constitution

http://www.gpoaccess.gov/sou/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. The inauguration speech doubles as state of the union
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. So you disagree with the Government Printing Office?
Which clearly states that Barack Obama gave his State of the Union speech on February 25th, 2009?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. You guys keep arguing. I'm going downstairs to watch Obama's SECOND SOTU speech.
Edited on Wed Jan-27-10 07:55 PM by Xipe Totec
TTFN!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. It's his FIRST.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Y'all are splitting hairs.
Edited on Wed Jan-27-10 08:03 PM by HiFructosePronSyrup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #30
36. It's Hares!




:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 08:19 PM
Original message
Is not. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #20
85. PBS said no, but...


:hi: I don't think you can give one, really, until you actually have done something, at least functionally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DebbieCDC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. "Those people" are some of your fellow DU-ers you know
Who maybe have just had enought of soaring but empty rhetoric
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
MissDeeds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. +1 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #13
32. And glad they are the 10% he lost from his base. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #13
41. Or working, or helping their kids with homework
or feeding or bathing an elderly relative. But this OP insists we ALL must watch or we should be ashamed of our selves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbie Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #41
71. No, actually in reference to those
Edited on Wed Jan-27-10 08:52 PM by Bobbie Jo
who simply "cannot bear to watch." etc... :nopity:

We all have lives, ya know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #41
87. we did all that- it's a pleasure to see the President I worked so hard to elect
speaking with passion and vision about the country I love.


It's a pleasure. We need some Dems to talk about trying to help - I think he has tried to help this year. But people are having a hard time seeing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #41
91. Or wasting time posting on DU
Shouldn't you be feeding or bathing an elderly relative, instead of wasting time posting here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. Second!
No, seriously, this is his second.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yep. It IS his second.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. No, it's not. Last year he gave a speech
LIKE the SOTU. But it wasn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. So, who gave the 2009 SOTU address, nobody?
Claiming it was just a speech is BS.

(I'm not claiming it it your BS, just claiming it is BS)

http://www.gpoaccess.gov/sou/index.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azmouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #18
37. It was called An Address to a Joint Session of Congress
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. Not by the government printing office
Which published the February 25 2009 speech as the State of the Union Address, regardless of what the White House wants to call it.

You're starting to make me think Obama wants to disown 2009, by pretending there was no State of the Union speech in 2009.

That would be really sleazy.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azmouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. *sigh*
You're alone in this, ya know? :yoiks:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. That does not mean I'm wrong
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azmouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. LOL
:spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #46
55. I'm glad somebody has a sense of humor!
Edited on Wed Jan-27-10 08:35 PM by Xipe Totec
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #37
49. It was called THE PRESIDENT'S ADDRESS BEFORE A JOINT SESSION OF CONGRESS ON THE STATE OF THE UNION
Main GPO site: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/sou/index.html

Link to actual SOTU for 2009: http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=111_cong_documents&docid=f:hd001.111

"From the House Documents Online via GPO Access


111th Congress, 1st Session - - - - - - - - - - House Document 111-1

PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS BEFORE A JOINT SESSION OF CONGRESS

__________

MESSAGE

from

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

transmitting

THE PRESIDENT'S ADDRESS BEFORE A JOINT SESSION OF CONGRESS ON THE STATE OF THE UNION

..."

<snip>

http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=111_cong_documents&docid=f:hd001.111
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #49
51. Read the actual address:
Edited on Wed Jan-27-10 08:32 PM by Xipe Totec
February 25, 2009.--Message and accompanying papers referred to the Committee on the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed To the Congress of the United States:

(ETA)

Regardless of the title, the actual text of the "Address to Congress" shows that it is the State of the Union Address.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #51
58. That's what I said.
Edited on Wed Jan-27-10 08:39 PM by Jamastiene
Look at the part I bolded in my other post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #58
62. So it is the State of the Union address, as I said.
There it is, in black and white.

It is an annual address.

Somebody has to give it.

Might as well be the President.

Bubble boy did not give it.

It must have been Obama.

Even in the unlikely event that this is not the State of the Union Address (Which I am not willing to concede), there was a State of the Union address in 2009, which would make this one the SECOND State of the Union Address of the Obama administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #62
64. Right...
I don't know why anyone is calling this his first SOTU when that link clearly shows his first was February 25, 2009.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #64
68. Oops! sorry for the friendly fire!
:hi:

:blush:


:banghead:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #68
94. No harm done.
I was backing you up and you were taking unfriendly fire all over the place. I can see how that could happen. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #18
39. He gave an Inaugural Address. Just like every other president in your link. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #39
57. And if you read the text of the address
you will see:

February 25, 2009.--Message and accompanying papers referred to the Committee on the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed

To the Congress of the United States:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #10
74. You're wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spartan61 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. It is not his second SOTU.
When he spoke last year, it was only a couple of week after the inauguration. It was not billed as a State of the Union address. That makes tonight's address his first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. This makes it his second
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #16
50. Is to...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timeforpeace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
35. Tell us what you remember the most from his first, OK? Shake up our memories.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #35
63. My memory sucks, but here is the full text of it.
It is a matter of public record.


From the House Documents Online via GPO Access





111th Congress, 1st Session - - - - - - - - - - - - - House Document 111-1



PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS BEFORE A JOINT SESSION OF CONGRESS

__________

MESSAGE

from

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

transmitting

THE PRESIDENT'S ADDRESS BEFORE A JOINT SESSION OF CONGRESS ON THE STATE
OF THE UNION

<GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>


February 25, 2009.--Message and accompanying papers referred to the
Committee on the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to
be printed
To the Congress of the United States:
I've come here tonight not only to address the
distinguished men and women in this great chamber, but to speak
frankly and directly to the men and women who sent us here.
I know that for many Americans watching right now, the
state of our economy is a concern that rises above all others.
And rightly so. If you haven't been personally affected by this
recession, you probably know someone who has--a friend; a
neighbor; a member of your family. You don't need to hear
another list of statistics to know that our economy is in
crisis, because you live it every day. It's the worry you wake
up with and the source of sleepless nights. It's the job you
thought you'd retire from but now have lost; the business you
built your dreams upon that's now hanging by a thread; the
college acceptance letter your child had to put back in the
envelope. The impact of this recession is real, and it is
everywhere.
But while our economy may be weakened and our confidence
shaken; though we are living through difficult and uncertain
times, tonight I want every American to know this:
We will rebuild, we will recover, and the United States of
America will emerge stronger than before.
The weight of this crisis will not determine the destiny of
this Nation. The answers to our problems don't lie beyond our
reach. They exist in our laboratories and universities; in our
fields and our factories; in the imaginations of our
entrepreneurs and the pride of the hardest-working people on
Earth. Those qualities that have made America the greatest
force of progress and prosperity in human history we still
possess in ample measure. What is required now is for this
country to pull together, confront boldly the challenges we
face, and take responsibility for our future once more. Now, if
we're honest with ourselves, we'll admit that for too long, we
have not always met these responsibilities--as a Government or
as a people. I say this not to lay blame or look backwards, but
because it is only by understanding how we arrived at this
moment that we'll be able to lift ourselves out of this
predicament.
The fact is, our economy did not fall into decline
overnight. Nor did all of our problems begin when the housing
market collapsed or the stock market sank. We have known for
decades that our survival depends on finding new sources of
energy. Yet we import more oil today than ever before. The cost
of health care eats up more and more of our savings each year,
yet we keep delaying reform. Our children will compete for jobs
in a global economy that too many of our schools do not prepare
them for. And though all these challenges went unsolved, we
still managed to spend more money and pile up more debt, both
as individuals and through our Government, than ever before.
In other words, we have lived through an era where too
often, short-term gains were prized over long-term prosperity;
where we failed to look beyond the next payment, the next
quarter, or the next election. A surplus became an excuse to
transfer wealth to the wealthy instead of an opportunity to
invest in our future. Regulations were gutted for the sake of a
quick profit at the expense of a healthy market. People bought
homes they knew they couldn't afford from banks and lenders who
pushed those bad loans anyway. And all the while, critical
debates and difficult decisions were put off for some other
time on some other day.
Well that day of reckoning has arrived, and the time to
take charge of our future is here.
Now is the time to act boldly and wisely--to not only
revive this economy, but to build a new foundation for lasting
prosperity. Now is the time to jumpstart job creation, re-start
lending, and invest in areas like energy, health care, and
education that will grow our economy, even as we make hard
choices to bring our deficit down. That is what my economic
agenda is designed to do, and that's what I'd like to talk to
you about tonight.
It's an agenda that begins with jobs.
As soon as I took office, I asked this Congress to send me
a recovery plan by President's Day that would put people back
to work and put money in their pockets. Not because I believe
in bigger Government--I don't. Not because I'm not mindful of
the massive debt we've inherited--I am. I called for action
because the failure to do so would have cost more jobs and
caused more hardships. In fact, a failure to act would have
worsened our long-term deficit by assuring weak economic growth
for years. That's why I pushed for quick action. And tonight, I
am grateful that this Congress delivered, and pleased to say
that the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act is now law.
Over the next 2 years, this plan will save or create 3.5
million jobs. More than 90 percent of these jobs will be in the
private sector--jobs rebuilding our roads and bridges;
constructing wind turbines and solar panels; laying broadband
and expanding mass transit.
Because of this plan, there are teachers who can now keep
their jobs and educate our kids. Health care professionals can
continue caring for our sick. There are 57 police officers who
are still on the streets of Minneapolis tonight because this
plan prevented the layoffs their department was about to make.
Because of this plan, 95 percent of the working households
in America will receive a tax cut--a tax cut that you will see
in your paychecks beginning on April 1st.
Because of this plan, families who are struggling to pay
tuition costs will receive a $2,500 tax credit for all four
years of college. And Americans who have lost their jobs in
this recession will be able to receive extended unemployment
benefits and continued health care coverage to help them
weather this storm.
I know there are some in this chamber and watching at home
who are skeptical of whether this plan will work. I understand
that skepticism. Here in Washington, we've all seen how quickly
good intentions can turn into broken promises and wasteful
spending. And with a plan of this scale comes enormous
responsibility to get it right.
That is why I have asked Vice President Biden to lead a
tough, unprecedented oversight effort--because nobody messes
with Joe. I have told each member of my Cabinet as well as
mayors and governors across the country that they will be held
accountable by me and the American people for every dollar they
spend. I have appointed a proven and aggressive Inspector
General to ferret out any and all cases of waste and fraud. And
we have created a new website called recovery.gov so that every
American can find out how and where their money is being spent.
So the recovery plan we passed is the first step in getting
our economy back on track. But it is just the first step.
Because even if we manage this plan flawlessly, there will be
no real recovery unless we clean up the credit crisis that has
severely weakened our financial system.
I want to speak plainly and candidly about this issue
tonight, because every American should know that it directly
affects you and your family's well-being. You should also know
that the money you've deposited in banks across the country is
safe; your insurance is secure; and you can rely on the
continued operation of our financial system. That is not the
source of concern.
The concern is that if we do not re-start lending in this
country, our recovery will be choked off before it even begins.
You see, the flow of credit is the lifeblood of our
economy. The ability to get a loan is how you finance the
purchase of everything from a home to a car to a college
education; how stores stock their shelves, farms buy equipment,
and businesses make payroll.
But credit has stopped flowing the way it should. Too many
bad loans from the housing crisis have made their way onto the
books of too many banks. With so much debt and so little
confidence, these banks are now fearful of lending out any more
money to households, to businesses, or to each other. When
there is no lending, families can't afford to buy homes or
cars. So businesses are forced to make layoffs. Our economy
suffers even more, and credit dries up even further.
That is why this Administration is moving swiftly and
aggressively to break this destructive cycle, restore
confidence, and re-start lending.
We will do so in several ways. First, we are creating a new
lending fund that represents the largest effort ever to help
provide auto loans, college loans, and small business loans to
the consumers and entrepreneurs who keep this economy running.
Second, we have launched a housing plan that will help
responsible families facing the threat of foreclosure lower
their monthly payments and refinance their mortgages. It's a
plan that won't help speculators or that neighbor down the
street who bought a house he could never hope to afford, but it
will help millions of Americans who are struggling with
declining home values--Americans who will now be able to take
advantage of the lower interest rates that this plan has
already helped bring about. In fact, the average family who
refinances today can save nearly $2,000 per year on their
mortgage.
Third, we will act with the full force of the Federal
Government to ensure that the major banks that Americans depend
on have enough confidence and enough money to lend even in more
difficult times. And when we learn that a major bank has
serious problems, we will hold accountable those responsible,
force the necessary adjustments, provide the support to clean
up their balance sheets, and assure the continuity of a strong,
viable institution that can serve our people and our economy.
I understand that on any given day, Wall Street may be more
comforted by an approach that gives banks bailouts with no
strings attached, and that holds nobody accountable for their
reckless decisions. But such an approach won't solve the
problem. And our goal is to quicken the day when we re-start
lending to the American people and American business and end
this crisis once and for all.
I intend to hold these banks fully accountable for the
assistance they receive, and this time, they will have to
clearly demonstrate how taxpayer dollars result in more lending
for the American taxpayer. This time, CEOs won't be able to use
taxpayer money to pad their paychecks or buy fancy drapes or
disappear on a private jet. Those days are over.
Still, this plan will require significant resources from
the Federal Government--and yes, probably more than we've
already set aside. But while the cost of action will be great,
I can assure you that the cost of inaction will be far greater,
for it could result in an economy that sputters along for not
months or years, but perhaps a decade. That would be worse for
our deficit, worse for business, worse for you, and worse for
the next generation. And I refuse to let that happen.
I understand that when the last Administration asked this
Congress to provide assistance for struggling banks, Democrats
and Republicans alike were infuriated by the mismanagement and
results that followed. So were the American taxpayers. So was
I.
So I know how unpopular it is to be seen as helping banks
right now, especially when everyone is suffering in part from
their bad decisions. I promise you--I get it.
But I also know that in a time of crisis, we cannot afford
to govern out of anger, or yield to the politics of the moment.
My job--our job--is to solve the problem. Our job is to govern
with a sense of responsibility. I will not spend a single penny
for the purpose of rewarding a single Wall Street executive,
but I will do whatever it takes to help the small business that
can't pay its workers or the family that has saved and still
can't get a mortgage.
That's what this is about. It's not about helping banks--
it's about helping people. Because when credit is available
again, that young family can finally buy a new home. And then
some company will hire workers to build it. And then those
workers will have money to spend, and if they can get a loan
too, maybe they'll finally buy that car, or open their own
business. Investors will return to the market, and American
families will see their retirement secured once more. Slowly,
but surely, confidence will return, and our economy will
recover.
So I ask this Congress to join me in doing whatever proves
necessary. Because we cannot consign our Nation to an open-
ended recession. And to ensure that a crisis of this magnitude
never happens again, I ask the Congress to move quickly on
legislation that will finally reform our outdated regulatory
system. It is time to put in place tough, new common-sense
rules of the road so that our financial market rewards drive
and innovation, and punishes short-cuts and abuse.
The recovery plan and the financial stability plan are the
immediate steps we're taking to revive our economy in the
short-term. But the only way to fully restore America's
economic strength is to make the long-term investments that
will lead to new jobs, new industries, and a renewed ability to
compete with the rest of the world. The only way this century
will be another American century is if we confront at last the
price of our dependence on oil and the high cost of health
care; the schools that aren't preparing our children and the
mountain of debt they stand to inherit. That is our
responsibility.
In the next few days, I will submit a budget to the
Congress. So often, we have come to view these documents as
simply numbers on a page or laundry lists of programs. I see
this document differently. I see it as a vision for America--as
a blueprint for our future.
My budget does not attempt to solve every problem or
address every issue. It reflects the stark reality of what
we've inherited--a trillion dollar deficit, a financial crisis,
and a costly recession.
Given these realities, everyone in this chamber--Democrats
and Republicans--will have to sacrifice some worthy priorities
for which there are no dollars. And that includes me.
But that does not mean we can afford to ignore our long-
term challenges. I reject the view that says our problems will
simply take care of themselves; that says Government has no
role in laying the foundation for our common prosperity.
For history tells a different story. History reminds us
that at every moment of economic upheaval and transformation,
this Nation has responded with bold action and big ideas. In
the midst of civil war, we laid railroad tracks from one coast
to another that spurred commerce and industry. From the turmoil
of the Industrial Revolution came a system of public high
schools that prepared our citizens for a new age. In the wake
of war and depression, the GI Bill sent a generation to college
and created the largest middle-class in history. And a twilight
struggle for freedom led to a nation of highways, an American
on the moon, and an explosion of technology that still shapes
our world.
In each case, Government didn't supplant private
enterprise; it catalyzed private enterprise. It created the
conditions for thousands of entrepreneurs and new businesses to
adapt and to thrive.
We are a Nation that has seen promise amid peril, and
claimed opportunity from ordeal. Now we must be that nation
again. That is why, even as it cuts back on the programs we
don't need, the budget I submit will invest in the three areas
that are absolutely critical to our economic future: energy,
health care, and education.
It begins with energy.
We know the country that harnesses the power of clean,
renewable energy will lead the 21st century. And yet, it is
China that has launched the largest effort in history to make
their economy energy efficient. We invented solar technology,
but we've fallen behind countries like Germany and Japan in
producing it. New plug-in hybrids roll off our assembly lines,
but they will run on batteries made in Korea.
Well I do not accept a future where the jobs and industries
of tomorrow take root beyond our borders--and I know you don't
either. It is time for America to lead again.
Thanks to our recovery plan, we will double this Nation's
supply of renewable energy in the next 3 years. We have also
made the largest investment in basic research funding in
American history--an investment that will spur not only new
discoveries in energy, but breakthroughs in medicine, science,
and technology.
We will soon lay down thousands of miles of power lines
that can carry new energy to cities and towns across this
country. And we will put Americans to work making our homes and
buildings more efficient so that we can save billions of
dollars on our energy bills.
But to truly transform our economy, protect our security,
and save our planet from the ravages of climate change, we need
to ultimately make clean, renewable energy the profitable kind
of energy. So I ask this Congress to send me legislation that
places a market-based cap on carbon pollution and drives the
production of more renewable energy in America. And to support
that innovation, we will invest $15 billion a year to develop
technologies like wind power and solar power; advanced
biofuels, clean coal, and more fuel-efficient cars and trucks
built right here in America.
As for our auto industry, everyone recognizes that years of
bad decision-making and a global recession have pushed our
automakers to the brink. We should not, and will not, protect
them from their own bad practices. But we are committed to the
goal of a re-tooled, re-imagined auto industry that can compete
and win. Millions of jobs depend on it. Scores of communities
depend on it. And I believe the Nation that invented the
automobile cannot walk away from it.
None of this will come without cost, nor will it be easy.
But this is America. We don't do what's easy. We do what is
necessary to move this country forward.
For that same reason, we must also address the crushing
cost of health care.
This is a cost that now causes a bankruptcy in America
every 30 seconds. By the end of the year, it could cause 1.5
million Americans to lose their homes. In the last 8 years,
premiums have grown four times faster than wages. And in each
of these years, one million more Americans have lost their
health insurance. It is one of the major reasons why small
businesses close their doors and corporations ship jobs
overseas. And it's one of the largest and fastest-growing parts
of our budget.
Given these facts, we can no longer afford to put health
care reform on hold.
Already, we have done more to advance the cause of health
care reform in the last thirty days than we have in the last
decade. When it was days old, this Congress passed a law to
provide and protect health insurance for 11 million American
children whose parents work full-time. Our recovery plan will
invest in electronic health records and new technology that
will reduce errors, bring down costs, ensure privacy, and save
lives. It will launch a new effort to conquer a disease that
has touched the life of nearly every American by seeking a cure
for cancer in our time. And it makes the largest investment
ever in preventive care, because that is one of the best ways
to keep our people healthy and our costs under control.
This budget builds on these reforms. It includes an
historic commitment to comprehensive health care reform--a
down-payment on the principle that we must have quality,
affordable health care for every American. It's a commitment
that's paid for in part by efficiencies in our system that are
long overdue. And it's a step we must take if we hope to bring
down our deficit in the years to come.
Now, there will be many different opinions and ideas about
how to achieve reform, and that is why I'm bringing together
businesses and workers, doctors and health care providers,
Democrats and Republicans to begin work on this issue next
week.
I suffer no illusions that this will be an easy process. It
will be hard. But I also know that nearly a century after Teddy
Roosevelt first called for reform, the cost of our health care
has weighed down our economy and the conscience of our Nation
long enough. So let there be no doubt: health care reform
cannot wait, it must not wait, and it will not wait another
year.
The third challenge we must address is the urgent need to
expand the promise of education in America.
In a global economy where the most valuable skill you can
sell is your knowledge, a good education is no longer just a
pathway to opportunity--it is a prerequisite.
Right now, three-quarters of the fastest-growing
occupations require more than a high school diploma. And yet,
just over half of our citizens have that level of education. We
have one of the highest high school dropout rates of any
industrialized nation. And half of the students who begin
college never finish.
This is a prescription for economic decline, because we
know the countries that out-teach us today will out-compete us
tomorrow. That is why it will be the goal of this
Administration to ensure that every child has access to a
complete and competitive education--from the day they are born
to the day they begin a career.
Already, we have made an historic investment in education
through the economic recovery plan. We have dramatically
expanded early childhood education and will continue to improve
its quality, because we know that the most formative learning
comes in those first years of life. We have made college
affordable for nearly seven million more students. And we have
provided the resources necessary to prevent painful cuts and
teacher layoffs that would set back our children's progress.
But we know that our schools don't just need more
resources. They need more reform. That is why this budget
creates new incentives for teacher performance; pathways for
advancement, and rewards for success. We'll invest in
innovative programs that are already helping schools meet high
standards and close achievement gaps. And we will expand our
commitment to charter schools.
It is our responsibility as lawmakers and educators to make
this system work. But it is the responsibility of every citizen
to participate in it. And so tonight, I ask every American to
commit to at least 1 year or more of higher education or career
training. This can be community college or a four-year school;
vocational training or an apprenticeship. But whatever the
training may be, every American will need to get more than a
high school diploma. And dropping out of high school is no
longer an option. It's not just quitting on yourself, it's
quitting on your country--and this country needs and values the
talents of every American. That is why we will provide the
support necessary for you to complete college and meet a new
goal: by 2020, America will once again have the highest
proportion of college graduates in the world.
I know that the price of tuition is higher than ever, which
is why if you are willing to volunteer in your neighborhood or
give back to your community or serve your country, we will make
sure that you can afford a higher education. And to encourage a
renewed spirit of national service for this and future
generations, I ask this Congress to send me the bipartisan
legislation that bears the name of Senator Orrin Hatch as well
as an American who has never stopped asking what he can do for
his country--Senator Edward Kennedy.
These education policies will open the doors of opportunity
for our children. But it is up to us to ensure they, walk
through them. In the end, there is no program or policy that
can substitute for a mother or father who will attend those
parent/teacher conferences, or help with homework after dinner,
or turn off the TV, put away the video games, and read to their
child. I speak to you not just as a President, but as a father
when I say that responsibility for our children's education
must begin at home.
There is, of course, another responsibility we have to our
children. And that is the responsibility to ensure that we do
not pass on to them a debt they cannot pay. With the deficit we
inherited, the cost of the crisis we face, and the long-term
challenges we must meet, it has never been more important to
ensure that as our economy recovers, we do what it takes to
bring this deficit down.
I'm proud that we passed the recovery plan free of
earmarks, and I want to pass a budget next year that ensures
that each dollar we spend reflects only our most important
national priorities.
Yesterday, I held a fiscal summit where I pledged to cut
the deficit in half by the end of my first term in office. My
Administration has also begun to go line by line through the
Federal budget in order to eliminate wasteful and ineffective
programs. As you can imagine, this is a process that will take
some time. But we're starting with the biggest lines. We have
already identified two trillion dollars in savings over the
next decade.
In this budget, we will end education programs that don't
work and end direct payments to large agribusinesses that don't
need them. We'll eliminate the no-bid contracts that have
wasted billions in Iraq, and reform our defense budget so that
we're not paying for Cold War-era weapons systems we don't use.
We will root out the waste, fraud, and abuse in our Medicare
program that doesn't make our seniors any healthier, and we
will restore a sense of fairness and balance to our tax code by
finally ending the tax breaks for corporations that ship our
jobs overseas.
In order to save our children from a future of debt, we
will also end the tax breaks for the wealthiest 2 percent of
Americans. But let me be perfectly clear, because I know you'll
hear the same old claims that rolling back these tax breaks
means a massive tax increase on the American people: if your
family earns less than $250,000 a year, you will not see your
taxes increased a single dime. I repeat: not one single dime.
In fact, the recovery plan provides a tax cut--that's right, a
tax cut--for 95 percent of working families. And these checks
are on the way.
To preserve our long-term fiscal health, we must also
address the growing costs in Medicare and Social Security.
Comprehensive health care reform is the best way to strengthen
Medicare for years to come. And we must also begin a
conversation on how to do the same for Social Security, while
creating tax-free universal savings accounts for all Americans.
Finally, because we're also suffering from a deficit of
trust, I am committed to restoring a sense of honesty and
accountability to our budget. That is why this budget looks
ahead 10 years and accounts for spending that was left out
under the old rules--and for the first time, that includes the
full cost of fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan. For 7 years, we
have been a nation at war. No longer will we hide its price.
We are now carefully reviewing our policies in both wars,
and I will soon announce a way forward in Iraq that leaves Iraq
to its people and responsibility ends this war.
And with our friends and allies, we will forge a new and
comprehensive strategy for Afghanistan and Pakistan to defeat
al Qaeda and combat extremism. Because I will not allow
terrorists to plot against the American people from safe havens
half a world away.
As we meet here tonight, our men and women in uniform stand
watch abroad and more are readying to deploy. To each and every
one of them, and to the families who bear the quiet burden of
their absence, Americans are united in sending one message: we
honor your service, we are inspired by your sacrifice, and you
have our unyielding support. To relieve the strain on our
forces, my budget increases the number of our soldiers and
Marines. And to keep our sacred trust with those who serve, we
will raise their pay, and give our veterans the expanded health
care and benefits that they have earned.
To overcome extremism, we must also be vigilant in
upholding the values our troops defend--because there is no
force in the world more powerful than the example of America.
That is why I have ordered the closing of the detention center
at Guantanamo Bay, and will seek swift and certain justice for
captured terrorists--because living our values doesn't make us
weaker, it makes us safer and it makes us stronger. And that is
why I can stand here tonight and say without exception or
equivocation that the United States of America does not
torture.
In words and deeds, we are showing the world that a new era
of engagement has begun. For we know that America cannot meet
the threats of this century alone, but the world cannot meet
them without America. We cannot shun the negotiating table, nor
ignore the foes or forces that could do us harm. We are instead
called to move forward with the sense of confidence and candor
that serious times demand.
To seek progress toward a secure and lasting peace between
Israel and her neighbors, we have appointed an envoy to sustain
our effort. To meet the challenges of the 21st century--from
terrorism to nuclear proliferation; from pandemic disease to
cyber threats to crushing poverty--we will strengthen old
alliances, forge new ones, and use all elements of our national
power.
And to respond to an economic crisis that is global in
scope, we are working with the nations of the G-20 to restore
confidence in our financial system, avoid the possibility of
escalating protectionism, and spur demand for American goods in
markets across the globe. For the world depends on us to have a
strong economy, just as our economy depends on the strength of
the world's.
As we stand at this crossroads of history, the eyes of all
people in all nations are once again upon us--watching to see
what we do, with this moment; waiting for us to lead.
Those of us gathered here tonight have been called to
govern in extraordinary times. It is a tremendous burden, but
also a great privilege--one that has been entrusted to few
generations of Americans. For in our hands lies the ability to
shape our world for good or for ill.
I know that it is easy to lose sight of this truth--to
become cynical and doubtful; consumed with the petty and the
trivial.
But in my life, I have also learned that hope is found in
unlikely places; that inspiration often comes not from those
with the most power or celebrity, but from the dreams and
aspirations of Americans who are anything but ordinary.
I think about Leonard Abess, the bank president from Miami
who reportedly cashed out of his company, took a $60 million
bonus, and gave it out to all 399 people who worked for him,
plus another 72 who used to work for him. He didn't tell
anyone, but when the local newspaper found out, he simply said,
``I knew some of these people since I was 7 years old. I didn't
feel right getting the money myself.''
I think about Greensburg, Kansas, a town that was
completely destroyed by a tornado, but is being rebuilt by its
residents as a global example of how clean energy can power an
entire community--how it can bring jobs and businesses to a
place where piles of bricks and rubble once lay. ``The tragedy
was terrible,'' said one of the men who helped them rebuild.
``But the folks here know that it also provided an incredible
opportunity.''
And I think about Ty'Sheoma Bethea, the young girl from
that school I visited in Dillon, South Carolina--a place where
the ceilings leak, the paint peels off the walls, and they have
to stop teaching six times a day because the train barrels by
their classroom. She has been told that her school is hopeless,
but the other day after class she went to the public library
and typed up a letter to the people sitting in this room. She
even asked her principal for the money to buy a stamp. The
letter asks us for help, and says, ``We are just students
trying to become lawyers, doctors, congressmen like yourself
and one day president, so we can make a change to not just the
state of South Carolina but also the world. We are not
quitters.''
We are not quitters.
These words and these stories tell us something about the
spirit of the people who sent us here. They tell us that even
in the most trying times, amid the most difficult
circumstances, there is a generosity, a resilience, a decency,
and a determination that perseveres; a willingness to take
responsibility for our future and for posterity.
Their resolve must be our inspiration. Their concerns must
be our cause. And we must show them and all our people that we
are equal to the task before us.
I know that we haven't agreed on every issue thus far, and
there are surely times in the future when we will part ways.
But,I also know that every American who is sitting here tonight
loves this country and wants it to succeed. That must be the
starting point for every debate we have in the coming months,
and where we return after those debates are done. That is the
foundation on which the American people expect us to build
common ground.
And if we do--if we come together and lift this Nation from
the depths of this crisis; if we put our people back to work
and restart the engine of our prosperity; if we confront
without fear the challenges of our time and summon that
enduring spirit of an America that does not quit, then someday
years from now our children can tell their children that this
was the time when we performed, in the words that are carved
into this very chamber, ``something worthy to be remembered.''
Thank you, God Bless you, and may God Bless the United States
of America.

Barack Obama.
The White House, February 24, 2009.

<all>

http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=111_cong_documents&docid=f:hd001.111
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #35
72. Well, my memory is not as good as it used to be but it went something like this:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. Shame on you?
Well, I never . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. Heck, I watched W.'s SOTUs...all of them.
Provided good laughs at the very least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Me too
I had a barf bag at the ready.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Even my non political husband watched one of them with me.
Then proceeded to say "Terra" and "Axis of Evil" all the time just to annoy me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. So did I...
I wanted NOT to be ignorant of all the ignorant things he said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Commonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
24. One year, during one W's SOTUS...
Edited on Wed Jan-27-10 07:49 PM by The_Commonist
Sweetie and I took out our copy of Finnegans Wake.
Every time W said something incomprehensible, one of us would randomly pick a line from the book and read it aloud. We wrote some of them down on post-its, which we still have on the fridge:

"Moykle ahoykling!"
"TeeTooTomTotalitarian"
"Whang poos the puddle and whiss whee whoo"
"Pflugerville Texas"

Another year, we just happened to be having a jam session the night of the SOTU, and we had the TV on and played music during the entire thing. It was all about terrorism and al Queda, and the music was dark and spooky. We recorded it all and it's one of my favorite jams ever.

I expect tonight to be pretty bland in comparison...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #24
88. oh, that's great. Love it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
14. I won't even turn this one into a drinking game. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
19. Are you serious?
:shrug: Really? wow.

Shame on you for telling people what they should be watching.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
21. Those not watching tonight were just looking for a reason
But those same people will be complaining loudly tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tejas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
28. Komrade,
more flies with honey than belittlement.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. After reading all the posts from people saying they won't watch it,
I have no desire to try to talk them into it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tejas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #31
70. Fair enough, I plan on watching. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #31
81. no, you are just going to insult them and tell them what to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
auntAgonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
33. I'm not watching it. I'm going to bed
I get up for work at 4am. NO shame on me.

Why do you think you can dictate to people what they should watch?


free country and all that.


aA
kesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #33
44. My OP is for people saying they won't watch it because they've given up on Obama,
are disappointed in him, don't want to hear his "purty words" anymore, etc. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #44
53. But where does it say that in your OP?
Edited on Wed Jan-27-10 08:34 PM by bigwillq
:shrug:

Either way it's still juvenile to tell someone they should be ashamed for not watching a speech just because they dared to voice an opinion that doesn't agree with yours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #53
56. It's implied-in response to those who said they won't watch it due to their disappointment in Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #56
67. Didn't get that from your OP.
But fine, cool. I really could care less who watches or doesn't watch it. I don't see why you care. Some are interested. Some are not. For many reasons. None which I care about, good or bad. I'll be watching (and logging off!) Have a good night! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #56
83. no, dear, it is NOT "implied"-- believe it or not, some of us had no idea what the hell you were
"implying", not having been around here all day. nice tap dance, but it doesn't work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Retrograde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
34. some people may not be near a TV or radio
like me - this will be the first time I've missed it in years. With luck I'll be able to catch a c-span repeat later.

6 PM isn't all that convenient for many people to see it live.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #34
73. This thread is in response to a thread and many posts from people saying they don't WANT to
watch it/will watch something else because they're fed up with the president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #34
76. You are near your computer, right?
So here it it, live on the web

http://www.whitehouse.gov/live
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
38. May I read it instead? Does that meet with your approval?
I prefer to read it because I personally find the applause interruptions and the camera shots of the frowning Republicans distracting.

And I find this type of scolding juvenile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #38
42. I find the applause distracting too.
Edited on Wed Jan-27-10 08:22 PM by bigwillq
I will watch, well the TV will be on the SOTU..I have newspapers and magazines I want to read too. I will read and watch.

And yeah, this thread is juvenile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #38
52. Are you purposely being obtuse?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #52
60. Roll your eyes all you want.
Threads like this are juvenile and do not win anyone over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #52
92. You seem to have plenty of spare time to waste
Edited on Wed Jan-27-10 11:01 PM by Xipe Totec
posting here...

Couldn't you spare some of it watching the Presidential State of the Union Address?

Instead of wasting it snubbing those who do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
47. you know, we are not REQUIRED to watch, or listen, or even read anybody's speech, including the sotu
for all kinds of reasons. that is called a democracy.

you know, it might be more beneficial for people to read "a people's history" tonight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #47
54. And shame on all of you who declared you won't watch it because of your displeasure with Obama. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #54
82. unless yo can direct me to a link where ****I*** personally said that, then kindly do NOT put me in
the "all you" group.

your righteous indignation is a bit wearying. some of us have other things to do, and don't need your moral instruction on how to spend our time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
48. Shame on you for telling us what to watch on TV!
You can skip every speech by every politician and miss nothing! The only thing that counts is their deeds!

We get more info from the likes of Keith Olbermann and Rachel Maddow, and from reputable discussion boards, than we do from a speech and the inevitable chatter of the Beltway's punditry.

Published on Wednesday, January 27, 2010 by CommonDreams.org

The State of My Union Isn’t So Great

by Donna Smith


While the media wonks and policy geeks banter about what President Obama will or won't say in his first State of the Union address, I'd like to offer my own view of the unfolding U.S. health system crisis. I'm a patient in this system, and I am a wife and mother who has maneuvered this system for my family for more than 35 years. So I am claiming my status as an expert. I have earned it.

And especially for those policy folks who now say it was dumb for the President and Congress to take on healthcare reform because it's a fringe issue not as important as the other issues we face, I say you are so lucky you can see the world that way - you must be healthy or wealthy or both. Because in my real world healthcare dealings, this messed up system is draining time, money, energy and health.

This is my first state of my union address, delivered January 25, 2010.

First, forgive me for repeating myself so many times, but the U.S. healthcare system doesn't revolve around providing me care. The U.S. healthcare system revolves around making money. The state of my union as a patient is not so good.

For those in the family who carry private, for-profit health insurance, our ability to get preventative care and seek basic healthcare services when we get ill is totally dependent upon our insurance companies and the providers who have contracts with our health insurance companies. The treatment we are allowed to receive is also totally determined by our health insurance companies - not by our medical needs. That's the state of our union.

First question asked when we seek care? "What kind of insurance do you have?" and not, "What is your medical problem?" First question at the front desk of the doctors' offices? "How will you be paying your co-pay today?" and not, "How are you feeling today?" First question at the hospital admission cubicle? "May I see your insurance card and your photo I.D.?" and not, "What brings you to the hospital today?" That's the state of the union for patients, too.

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/01/27-7

Published on Wednesday, January 27, 2010 by The Wall Street Journal

Centrism Died in Massachusetts

Obama needs to fight even harder for Democratic principles.

by Thomas Frank

Here is an actual bit of data from the Massachusetts debacle. The AFL-CIO conducted a poll in the state and, according to the union's pollsters, it revealed that the election "was a working-class revolt" driven by a "huge swing among non-college voters," who went for President Obama in 2008 and for Mr. Brown this time around.

Here is a second data point: The Progressive Change Campaign Committee, together with two other liberal groups, did a poll of Massachusetts voters who voted for Mr. Obama in 2008 and then for Mr. Brown last week. Health-care reform was, as everyone knows, the most important issue in the Massachusetts race, and yet if this poll is to be believed, an incredible 82% of these swing voters favor the late "public option," a bête noir of the centrist punditry. Even if the poll is off by a few points, that number is shocking.

A third bit of data: A nonpartisan national poll of 800 voters who closely follow politics by Clarus Research Group in December found the Obama administration's most prominent centrists-its economic team of Larry Summers and Tim Geithner-to be its only members whose "disapproval" numbers were higher than their "approval" ratings.

And yet what our genius centrists are calling for, in effect, is to hand over even more authority to these least popular and least successful elements of the Obama administration. They are basically telling Mr. Obama that the way to court alienated blue-collar voters is by extolling entrepreneurship and toning down the administration's occasional anti-Wall Street rhetoric. It is like suggesting someone kick smoking by going from one pack a day to two.

I have my own suggestion for Mr. Obama as he prepares for his State of the Union address: Instead of knifing your allies, try fighting for the principles of your party. It's true, that's not what Mr. Clinton did. But it's what Franklin Roosevelt did, and Harry Truman, and John Kennedy-and it worked for them. In those days, "working-class revolts" helped Democrats, not Republicans.

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/01/27-6

Voters See Health Care Reform As Marred By Backroom Deals

CHARLES BABINGTON | 01/27/10 04:37 PM |

WASHINGTON — Special legislative favors, especially one designed to secure a Nebraska senator's vote for the embattled health care package, ignited so much public outrage that President Barack Obama is calling them a mistake and House leaders say the bill can't be resurrected unless such sweetheart deals are scrapped.

Obama says Americans were understandably upset by the backroom dealmaking that he called ugly. In a cruel twist, the reaction helped elect a Republican senator in Massachusetts last week, putting the health legislation in peril.

Some Senate Democrats urged party leaders to put health care on a back burner. Rep. Jim Clyburn of South Carolina, the No. 3 House Democrat, said Tuesday the House may be able to pass the Senate-approved version of the bill – and salvage Obama's top domestic priority – if the offending items are deleted.

"We've got to get rid of that Nebraska stuff, we've got to get rid of the Louisiana stuff," Clyburn said, referring to provisions inserted to help secure the votes of holdout Democratic senators Ben Nelson of Nebraska and Mary Landrieu of Louisiana.

Obama, speaking to ABC News this week, said, "I didn't make a bunch of deals." But he acknowledged making "a legitimate mistake" by letting White House and congressional negotiators include the items during last month's closed-door negotiations.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/27/voters-see-health-care-re_n_438327.html


Obama did make one shameful deal, the one with PhRMA which led to Democrats in Congress voting against the reimportation of cheap drugs from Canada.

Thanks a lot, buddy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #48
59. I didn't tell you what to watch on tv...
the way commondreams tells you what to think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #59
65. You are the authoritarian in here!
Your hatred of progressives is quite blatant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #65
86. Help, I'm being oppressed!!!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #59
69. But you told us we should be ashamed if we don't watch (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
61. I am sorry
I am working on revising my novel. I work all day and I have to write at night and I have to do it every day. I have no choice. Now if you'll excuse me, I have to go back to Chapter 6.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #61
66. What, you can't take a one hour brake to watch the State of the Union?
Edited on Wed Jan-27-10 08:45 PM by Xipe Totec
But you have time to piss away posting on DU?

Shame on you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #61
77. My OP is a response thread to one from people saying they're not going to watch because they're
Edited on Wed Jan-27-10 08:59 PM by jenmito
fed up with Obama. I figured people would get that since more than a few posters said that today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveOurDemocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
75. SHAME ON YOU, Mother Superior!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
78. Eat my shorts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #78
89. Calzone? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
79. couldn't agree more- people seem to have forgotten how awful it was to
Edited on Wed Jan-27-10 09:10 PM by tigereye
have that inarticulate and clueless POTUS speaking the last time around.


It's so exciting to see this, in the same way that I felt excited when Pelosi was first chosen as Speaker. For the first time...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
80. Shame on you for condemning others freedom to choose
how they spend their time. I'm annoyed and disappointed with Obama but I'm watching, it's my choice to do so for my reasons. To you ... :thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
84. I never watch the SOTU address.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #84
90. But you have plenty of spare time to post here
Imagine that...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
93. Bite me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
95. i watched a Howard Zinn documentary instead.
OH FUCKING WELL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
96. Oh, I didn't realize that it was a mandatory class.
I thought that it was an elective.

My bad.........

:7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoxFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
97. Wait one dang minute!
I have a weird, long-standing habit of not watching the SOTU address. I will listen on the radio and/or read it later. I find the television coverage distracting.

As a state legislator, I dreaded sitting through the State of the State and the Budget Address. The chamber was stuffy, and the canned applause got on my nerves. That probably influences my feelings on watching these things on the tube.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC