Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Blanche Lincoln already lost the seat. A primary challenger can't make it worse.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-10 10:35 AM
Original message
Blanche Lincoln already lost the seat. A primary challenger can't make it worse.
Edited on Mon Mar-01-10 10:47 AM by Kurt_and_Hunter
Someone arises to take on a weak incumbent in a primary. The party goes on to lose in the fall.

What is the chain of cause and effect?

A challenger doesn't help but when a challenger arises it is usually because the incumbent is screwed anyway.

There is almost always a primary challenge insofar as there is usually a Mike Gravel type candidate on the ballot. The races where we identify a real challenge are only where the challenger is competitive.

Buchanan could have been Mike Gravel or less in 1992.... gotten 200 votes in New Hampshire and never appeared on TV. The reason he did surprisingly well was that GHW Bush had alienated the nut-right. The efficacy of the challenge is about the incumbent, not the challenger.

Same with Eugene McCarthy. He didn't bring down LBJ in 1968. LBJ was already down. McCarthy didn't create anger over Vietnam, he merely symbolized it.

I expect that Blanche Lincoln will win the primary and get creamed in the general election. But that was going to happen anyway.

And if she loses the primary then Halter will get probably creamed in the general election.

Either way, the pugs are picking up the seat. And either way there will be a post-mortem talking about how the process divided the Democratic vote.

But Lincoln would lose to anyone in the general. And the certainty of her loss is exactly what motivates a challenge, however Quixotic.

I went through this in 1984. Gary Hart was kind of a silly candidate but I backed him because Mondale was going to lose badly. Hart would also have lost badly but at least he would have been trying... even while losing just as many states he might have roughed up Reagan a little.

So I will root for Halter, not because he might win in November but because he might actually say something interesting on the way to the inevitable pug-pickup. Maybe make a case for Democrats or something. Who knows?

I don't know that he will. But we all know that Lincoln won't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-10 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. This is the perfect situation to challenge
Some challenges are just dumb, they cost the party too much money that could be better spent elsewhere and there's no real benefit in the run itself. If Lincoln's challenger starts telling Arkansans the truth about various policies, that can only be good for everybody. She is so far gone from reality, she just really blew it. I think Arkansans could be convinced to be a little more populist, if they had their leaders going in that direction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-10 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. I think everybody knows that the seat will go to a republican. So
in this case there shouldn't be any argument about a primary challenge hurting the candidate who wins the primary. I say "shouldn't" but of course there will be. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-10 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. I only /heard er once...this AM, but I already think he's thousands better than Blanch!
Why do you already think he can't win? I'm not from AR so I guess my opioion doesn't matter, and I don't know who his Pub opponent will be, but he sure seems to at least have a chance in this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-10 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Looking at how Obama did in Arkansas vs. McCain...
...it looks like with Bill Clinton a distant memory that state is trending deep red.

So I don't expect any Dem to hold that seat.

(What are Obama's favorables there? I would guess pretty bad.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-10 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
5. why can't Halter win in November?
because Rahm says he can't? Because Tweety says that corpo-dems are the only kind of dem that can hold that seat?

What's wrong with Halter?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuart G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-10 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. While this may be true..There was something about a black man becoming President, that
I recall a couple of years ago. Which I might add, I believed too. Let us not forget this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-10 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
6. Three Words
Anything Can Happen. While yours is the likely scenario, anything can happen, like Brown in Mass. Let's not talk ourselves into a loss before the ballots are even cast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-10 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
8. I think the primary challenge gives us a chance at salvaging the seat
If Halter won the primary, he'd go into the general as a non-incumbent and that is a good thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-10 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
9. Who's challenging Harry Reid?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-10 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
10. Either way, the Dem will be a bill halter. n/t
Edited on Mon Mar-01-10 04:59 PM by Orsino
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-10 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. NICE!!!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-10 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
12. I would add something
Blanche Lincoln's approval numbers were fine a year ago and she looked like she would likely win re-election. I think we need to consider what has changed since then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #12
18. It is national
I'd suggest that all Dem incumbents are weaker than they were a year ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. True and why is that?
IMO it's because congressional Democrats look like the Keystone Cops because they couldn't get health care through. If they would act collaboratively to pass the bill instead of each trying to grab their share of the pie, they would all be in a better position now. Thus Lincoln has really contributed to her own demise by being an obstructionist on health care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warm regards Donating Member (350 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-10 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
13. Exactly...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-10 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
14. I disagree about Hart
Look at the constituencies and the primary election map.

Hart hit Reagan at both his strengths and his weaknesses.

Mondale was a sure loser- and hurt downticket in many state and local areas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Just making a point
Yes, Hart probably would have done better because he couldn't have done worse. But I didn't want to side-track the OP into that question since I was arguing that he would have been better for the cause even if he didn't get any more votes than Mondale did--conceding parity to make a point.

But yeah, you're probably correct.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GrantDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-10 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
15. Keep in mind that Halter is the Lt. Governor
Therefore we know that he is, at least, capable of winning a statewide election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalpragmatist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-10 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
16. Agreed.
There are plenty of stupid primary challenges. This isn't one. Yeah, Halter will probably lose. But as you said, Lincoln likely will too. We might as well give her a scare - she might vote with us a little more often - and if Halter does win the nomination, he can't do any WORSE than Lincoln, who has already pissed off most Arkansas Dems without getting any support from independents or Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC