Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Today's Jobs Numbers Do Not Tell the Full Story of Men and Their Families

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-10 01:30 PM
Original message
Today's Jobs Numbers Do Not Tell the Full Story of Men and Their Families
Today's Jobs Numbers Do Not Tell the Full Story of Men and Their Families

Joy Moses
Policy Analyst, Poverty & Prosperity program, Center for American Progress
Posted: March 5, 2010 05:01 PM


Even as the economy benefits from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, or ARRA, and continues to show some signs of being on the mend, today's unemployment numbers continue to demonstrate how badly workers are faring--especially if they are low-wage and/or low-skilled men. In February, those with the least amount of education had an unemployment rate of 15.6% as compared to the general rate which remained static at 9.7%. The unemployment extension that was signed by President Obama earlier this week and the pending jobs bill should provide some relief. However, low-income men are facing serious challenges that reach beyond the impact of the recession and that affect their children and families.

Antipoverty programs are often built around serving women and children, leaving many low-income men out in the cold. Policies focused on children and families must include a greater focus on men, being mindful of the fact that many of these men are fathers who can and do make positive contributions to their children's lives while also helping to lift the economic burden from the backs of low-income women who far too often bear the majority of the cost associated with childrearing. To some this is simply a statement of the obvious. However, many Americans continue to carry negative stereotypes about poor men especially if they are people of color, lack stable employment, face difficulties financially providing for their families, have a criminal record, or possess a combination of these factors.

Policies should be comprehensive and aimed at reconnecting the disconnected. Far too many men, and especially African-American men, are disconnected from employment, but also from society and their families.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/joy-moses/todays-jobs-numbers-do-no_b_488054.html

An interesting perspective by Joy Moses on an increasingly grim outlook for many Americans, particularly African-Americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-10 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. So Many Are So Totally Fucked. Next Time, Let's Vote For Democrats
Real Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DavidDvorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-10 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. You go to the ballot box with the Democrats you have
not the Democrats you wished you had.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-10 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. How about primaries? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DavidDvorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-10 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. True, there we have a choice
But it's not always a meaningful choice. Locally, it may be, but on the national level, you still have to worry about who can win. In almost all cases, I'd rather have a semi-Democrat in a national office than a Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-10 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. We've Done Semi-Democrats For The Last 17 Years
I don't think it's gone well for us.

Time for plan C.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-10 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Quoting Rumsfeld?
Forget the sarcasm tag?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DavidDvorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-10 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I wasn't being sarcastic
Yes, I was paraphrasing Rumsfeld, and the paraphrase is apt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-10 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. How about serving women without children?
Nobody gives a damn about us. It's like we can go hang as far as society is concerned, because we're not moms, so no children are going to suffer if we curl up and die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuelahWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-07-10 02:44 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC