LiberalFighter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-07-10 09:55 AM
Original message |
Any future campaign against Republicans in presidential campaigns |
|
should strongly label them as wanting a war at any cost and no justifiable reason like in Iraq.
|
90-percent
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-07-10 10:06 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Sun Mar-07-10 10:07 AM by 90-percent
War for the hell of it.
When America invades, it's probably for some good reason.
Our leaders wouldn't take us to war as casually as one goes to the corner convenience store to get some milk, would they?
-90% jimmy
|
Bluenorthwest
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-07-10 10:16 AM
Response to Original message |
2. You mean the wars the Democrats simply continued? |
|
How would that point be best made, from the field in Iraq 4 years in, or in 'Af-Pak' which now has a cute name and is our longest lasing war ever?
|
LiberalFighter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-07-10 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. It's easier to not go to war than it is to stop a war. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 10th 2024, 10:10 PM
Response to Original message |