Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WH Blog: More Evidence of an Urgent Problem - Slams insurance companies for premium increases

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-07-10 11:45 AM
Original message
WH Blog: More Evidence of an Urgent Problem - Slams insurance companies for premium increases
More Evidence of an Urgent Problem
Posted by Dan Pfeiffer on March 07, 2010 at 11:35 AM EST

The last few days have brought even more evidence that the health care status quo is working out great for the insurance companies – at the same time as it continues to fail American families and businesses. No wonder the insurance companies are spending millions and millions of dollars to block reform.

On Wednesday, a leading insurance broker laid out in clear terms what many Americans could already guess: the insurers’ monopoly is so strong that they can continue to jack up rates as much as they like – even if it means losing customers – and their profits will continue to soar under the status quo.

Speaking about the lack of competition – a key target of reform – broker Steve Lewis told investors on a conference call organized by Wall Street giant Goldman Sachs:

“Not only is price competition down from year ago (when we had characterized last year’s price competition as being down from the prior year), but trend or (healthcare) inflation is also up and appears to be rising. The incumbent carriers seem more willing than ever to walk away from existing business resulting in some carrier changes…”

What does it mean when the insurance companies “walk away?” It means more and more American families forced to choose between the mortgage and health care bills. It means being hospital visit away from certain bankruptcy. And for Mr. Lewis’s clients – business owners – it means not being able to do the right thing for their employees.

Asked about the rate increases we’ve all been hearing so much about, Lewis said:

“I’d say we settled in a range, on our book of business, from a 5 percent reduction to a 50 percent increase. But generally speaking, we were in the low- to mid-teens, and this is where the real challenges begin.”

Lewis then went on to answer questions about what reform would mean for the scores of businesses across the country who are being priced out of insurance because of lack of competition among carriers. He found that employers agree with the goals and urgency of health insurance reform:

“I think most people would acknowledge that there’s a need for healthcare reform, employers continue to be very frustrated. So when they look at what the Obama administration and the Democratic Majority state as their goals to increase access and lower cost and rail at what may be termed oligopolistic behavior of carriers in certain markets, I think employers really buy into that message and have much of that frustration and anger at our lack of solutions.”

Lewis’s conference call followed on the heels of another eyebrow-raising analysis from Wall Street (PDF).

You remember Wellpoint, the massive insurance company behind the 39-percent rate increases in California. Well, according to a recent study by Wall Street investment bank Cowen & Co. finds that “Wellpoint would be a primary beneficiary” if reform fails.

The Washington Post explains that Wellpoint’s business model is focused on the individual and small-group market where most of the egregious rate-hikes and abuses take place. So enacting reform – with its protections against unreasonable rate increases and guarantees that more of your money will go toward care, not profits – would mean that Wellpoint and others like it would have to change their ways. Which, of course, is what reform is all about.

It’s time to get this done.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2010/03/07/more-evidence-urgent-problem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-07-10 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. Exactly why we need a public option
They make our case for us every time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-07-10 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I hope so.
By the way, "they" are "us". :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-07-10 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Actually I'm talking about the administration and their apparent lack of support for the po.
We here have a clue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-07-10 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. Without a Public Option, we will never break the health insurance monopoly
Our "Change You Can Believe" President does not want to break up the monopolies of Big Pharma and Big Insurance, which is why he instructed Democrats in Congress to vote down cheap importation of drugs from Canada, and nixed Single Payer and Public Option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-07-10 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Your subject line may be true.
However, the comments about Obama's motivations that follow amount to nothing but a pile of snarky bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-07-10 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Didn't the Democrats in Congress kill the drug re-importation bill in order to save the PhRMA deal?
My distinguished colleague, you are the one ignoring the evidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denimgirly Donating Member (929 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-07-10 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Stay classy Democrats...stay classy!
Edited on Sun Mar-07-10 01:21 PM by denimgirly
that is soooo wrong...no importation is literally a blatant attempt to protect profits and to allow them to grow with no upside for consumers.
Sounds like the america people are slaves rather than free men/women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-07-10 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. so point us in the direction to disprove the *snarky bullshit*
Or does the leaked memo about the backroom deals with Pharma not a factor in your world?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-07-10 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. I'm not denying there was a "back room deal".
To claim the President "does not want to break up the monopolies of Big Pharma and Big Insurance" is both snarky and bullshit, however. Politics is not pretty and sometimes negotiations produce strange bedfellows. The "deal" (insofar as there was one) was concessions to Pharma in order to gain support for the overall package. Does that mean he doesn't want to break up monopolies? Um...no. It's really not hard to understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denimgirly Donating Member (929 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-07-10 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. Mr. President, Read aloud more Touching Sad Stories to the Industry...You're on the Right Tack!
Edited on Sun Mar-07-10 01:18 PM by denimgirly
Pubic Option is dumb.
Single Payer is stupid.
Reading sad sob stories about people getting denied while those deniers get richer....THAT is the cure to the problem! Stay the course Mr. President...you've got the right idea!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-07-10 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
9. K&R!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-07-10 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
11. As long as they are in control of access to healthcare, there will
always be problems. They have the resources from election to election to stay in control. Regulations as we have seen, are apt to fluctuate depending on who they are able to help into office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
subterranean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-07-10 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
13. Well, this sort of behavior will not be tolerated.
Edited on Sun Mar-07-10 04:00 PM by subterranean
We need to teach these corporations a lesson by forcing EVERYONE to buy their products. That'll make them change their ways!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-07-10 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
14. Kabuki Theater.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC