Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ezra Klein: The State-Based Single Payer Strategy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 05:39 PM
Original message
Ezra Klein: The State-Based Single Payer Strategy
The state-based single payer strategy

"Quite frankly," Sen. Bernie Sanders said today, "we don't have the votes for single payer." That's not much of a surprise, but Sanders did outline another strategy for single payer that some liberals might want to think about. "Right now," he explained, "we have language in the bill that says that states that want to go forward with single payer can do that." He's talking about the Waiver for State Innovation, which allows states to go their own way if they have a plan that will achieve the goals of the bill at a lower cost. You could imagine a state -- say, California, where the legislature has passed single-payer bills before only to see them vetoed by the governor -- using that provision to implement a single-payer system.

Sanders thought this the best strategy going forward. "I believe the way we move to single payer in this country is to let one state like California go first," he said. And before some of my conservative readers decide this is a liberal trapdoor in the middle of the bill, the provision could be used to develop a much more conservative approach to universal health care. In fact, it's a legislative expression of the GOP's third plank for health-care reform: "Give states the tools to create their own innovative reforms that lower health-care costs."

The health-care reform bill will create a basic, near-universal system across the country. If individual states think they can do better, they're welcome to try. And if they succeed, you could imagine those reforms spreading quickly to other states, too.

By Ezra Klein
March 10, 2010

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2010/03/the_state-based_single_payer_s.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. Bernie Sanders=Corporate Whore
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. Many states do not give a shit about their (poor) people. A race to the bottom. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. My state, AZ, has a ballot referendum that pretty much puts the kibosh on it.
Amends the state's constitution so that people cannot be forced to have insurance. HCR will supersede that at the national level but I assume it would apply to any state based plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. Can the insurance cos. sue though? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. I was under the impression that Canada went province-by-province
in enacting its system. Maybe this is the best way to go about a single-payer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Yes. They run it by province. In Ontario, it's Ontario Health Insurance Plan. OHIP. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. Any states that go it alone
will see people with chronic illnesses eventually move to those states. The states that they move from will probably give them gas money to leave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Yes. It's much easier to move from state to state in this country. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. Is it legal for a state to ban private companies and monopolize an industry?
Do states that decide to go ahead have adequate protection under law?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC