Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Patrick Kennedy: Press Corps Is 'Despicable' For Not Covering Afghanistan War Resolution

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 11:11 PM
Original message
Patrick Kennedy: Press Corps Is 'Despicable' For Not Covering Afghanistan War Resolution
Patrick Kennedy: Press Corps Is 'Despicable' For Not Covering Afghanistan War Resolution

Rep. Patrick Kennedy (D-R.I.) excoriated the national press on Wednesday during a debate over the war in Afghanistan, charging reporters with shirking their duty to cover the issue and instead focusing on the peccadillos of former Rep. Eric Massa (D-N.Y.).

"There's one, two press people in this gallery," he thundered. "We're talking about Eric Massa 24/7 on the TV. We're talking about war and peace; $3 billion; 1,000 lives and no press! No press!"

The House is debating a resolution written by Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio), which would require the military to withdraw from Afghanistan within 30 days or longer if it couldn't be done safely that quickly.

"You want to know why the American public is fit? They're fit because they're not seeing their Congress do the work that they're sent to do," railed Kennedy, who is retiring at the end of this term. "It's because the press, the press of the United States, is not covering the most significant issue of national importance and that's the laying of lives down in the nation for the service of our country. It's despicable, the national press corps right now."

UPDATE: The resolution was defeated by a vote of 356-65, with 60 Democrats and five Republicans voting to end the war.

The roll call can be found here.

Several powerful chairmen -- David Obey (D-Wisc.), Barney Frank (D-Mass.) and George Miller (D-Calif.) -- voted to end the war, and Obey's opposition will be particularly noted by war proponents, given that he controls the purse strings through the Appropriations Committee.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/03/10/patrick-kennedy-press-cor_n_493848.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Common Sense Party Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. "Fit"? Physically fit? Fit to be tied? What does he mean?
The national press corps is ALWAYS despicable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. You have to hear it delivered to understand what he meant. He was livid and his grammar .....
.... took leave of him.

Find a clip of him saying what he said and all will be clear to you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 07:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. Well, they cant be bothered talking about real topics.
Massa is so much more fun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
queenjane Donating Member (258 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
3. Kennedy looked 2 seconds from having an aneurysm
Saw the footage last night--haven't seen such rage in a long time. He was so frustrated, so angry, almost foaming. I wondered why he was stepping down, but now I understand. I am horrified at the shallowness and superficiality of our society, the lack of caring about ANYTHING remotely important, the proud ignorance, the sheep-like behavior. No wonder we can't recruit really intelligent, dedicated people to run for office, and are left with flotsam & dregs . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
4. Parent companies of news networks make a fortune from the wars...
They'll cover "successes" and strategy, but not the idea that we shouldn't be there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. Less than 24hours after his speech, Andrea Greenspan Mitchell takes his national platform to ask
What did Nancy Pelosi know and when did she know it about Masa?

RW Talking Points no matter how much real news surrounds them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. You gotta give it to them. They'll cut through all the real topics to get to the heart of the
Edited on Thu Mar-11-10 02:16 PM by Guy Whitey Corngood
bullshit. Shouldn't it be the other way around?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. When the show sponsors are BigPharma, Big Insurance, and Big Auto, the script
is pretty much written for the powdered-face bubble heads in the Fourth Estate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustABozoOnThisBus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
9. I saw that part of the speech (tv rerun). I think P. Kennedy ...
is wound a little too tight for politics. His head is going to explode.

It isn't like he was all that upset with the war. He was really, really, REALLY upset with the press.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC