Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Stupak is "chagrined...discouraged...downbeat," whines to NRO about others on his team caving

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 03:46 PM
Original message
Stupak is "chagrined...discouraged...downbeat," whines to NRO about others on his team caving
Edited on Fri Mar-12-10 04:00 PM by jefferson_dem
:bounce:

‘They Just Want This Over’

Sitting in an airport, on his way home to Michigan, Rep. Bart Stupak, a pro-life Democrat, is chagrined. “They’re ignoring me,” he says, in a phone interview with National Review Online. “That’s their strategy now. The House Democratic leaders think they have the votes to pass the Senate’s health-care bill without us. At this point, there is no doubt that they’ve been able to peel off one or two of my twelve. And even if they don’t have the votes, it’s been made clear to us that they won’t insert our language on the abortion issue.”

According to Stupak, that group of twelve pro-life House Democrats — the “Stupak dozen” — has privately agreed for months to vote ‘no’ on the Senate’s health-care bill if federal funding for abortion is included in the final legislative language. Now, in the debate’s final hours, Stupak says the other eleven are coming under “enormous” political pressure from both the White House and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D., Calif.). “I am a definite ‘no’ vote,” he says. “I didn’t cave. The others are having both of their arms twisted, and we’re all getting pounded by our traditional Democratic supporters, like unions.”

Stupak says he also doesn’t trust the “Slaughter solution,” a legislative maneuver being bandied about on Capitol Hill as a way to pass the Senate bill in the House without actually voting on it. “Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me,” he says. “I don’t have a warm-and-fuzzy feeling about what I’m hearing.”

Stupak notes that his negotiations with House Democratic leaders in recent days have been revealing. “I really believe that the Democratic leadership is simply unwilling to change its stance,” he says. “Their position says that women, especially those without means available, should have their abortions covered.” The arguments they have made to him in recent deliberations, he adds, “are a pretty sad commentary on the state of the Democratic party.”

<SNIP>

“Throughout this debate, even when the House leaders have acknowledged us, it’s always been in a backhanded way,” he laments. “I’m telling the others to hold firm, and we’ll meet next week, but I’m disappointed in my colleagues who said they’d be with us and now they’re not. It’s almost like some right-to-life members don’t want to be bothered. They just want this over.”

And the politics of the issue are pretty rough. “This has really reached an unhealthy stage,” Stupak says. “People are threatening ethics complaints on me. On the left, they’re really stepping it up. Every day, from Rachel Maddow to the Daily Kos, it keeps coming. Does it bother me? Sure. Does it change my position? No.”

http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MzU0MDYxMWEyOTdiNGU1OGU3ZjYzYmE3Y2ZlZDQ5NTY=


here's the link to stupak's very downbeat comments http://ow.ly/1irMs #tcot #hcr
12 minutes ago via web

more stupak: "It’s almost like some right-to-life members don’t want to be bothered. They just want this over.” #tcot
half a minute ago via web

“I’m telling the others 2 hold firm,& we’ll meet next week,but I’m disappointed in my colleagues who said they’d be w/ us&now they’re not."
1 minutes ago via web

“Itwould be very,very hard for someone who is a right-to-life Democrat to run for office.I won’t leave the party,I’m more comfortable here..
2 minutes ago via web

if obama care passes, stupak says...
3 minutes ago via web

.. and we’re all getting pounded by our traditional Democratic supporters, like unions.”
4 minutes ago via web

stupak: “I am a definite ‘no’ vote. I didn’t cave. The others are having both of their arms twisted..."
4 minutes ago via

web nro just talked to stupak. he sounds very, very discouraged
7 minutes ago via web

http://twitter.com/RichLowry




...........................................................................................................................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 03:53 PM
Original message
I don't believe the "they say it's about the money" b.s. for a moment.
Can't stand this guy. How dare he attempt to control not only what women do with their bodies, but what we do with our own money. That reminds me. I need to go check out his Democratic primary challenger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nancy doing her job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. Is he aware that the Dem. party platform is pro-choice? He obviously considers
his own platform, a "pretty sad commentary on the state of the Democratic party.” :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Control-Z Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. Exactly!
He is personally entitled to choose the anti-choice position, but the democratic party is pro-choice, and only a fool would believe that his opinion had the power to change one of the party's core stances.

'“I really believe that the Democratic leadership is simply unwilling to change its stance,” he says.' Duh.

'“Their position says that women, especially those without means available, should have their abortions covered.”
Yep. See, that is the major difference between Republicans and Democrats.' Dems help people. Repukes kick people, especially when they're already down.

You really have to wonder what Stupak is doing in the democratic party when he so willingly rallies against the most vulnerable of women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. What A Whiny Douche
Fuck off Stupak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Froward69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I Second that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
32. Rachel outed his hypocritical ass ..
Edited on Fri Mar-12-10 06:46 PM by Cha
..asking who paid the rent on his cozy C street digs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zoeisright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
42. Exactly.
Kick that dipshit to the curb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. Stupak says his bloc of votes is cracking (The Hill)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kber Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
27. Interesting quote in your article
"At this point, there is no doubt that they’ve been able to peel off one or two of *my* twelve," he said. "

Bart - they aren't *yours* any more than my uterus is *yours*. They don't answer to you; they are supposed to answer to their constituents.

If you remembered that maybe you wouldn't be facing a primary challenge.

Patriarchy at it's worst.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tallahasseedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
6. Suck it Supak...
The party you claim to be a part of believes in a woman's right to choose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nancy Waterman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. He is incredibly stupid
The bill doesn't allow federal money for abortions. Stupid Stupak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. This guy shouldn't be in the party
I don't object to pro-life Democrats, as long as they realize that the party they're a part of is pro-choice. And when it comes down to voting for the party's signature issue (health care) and you're willing to kill it over something that the party supports (choice), then what the hell are you doing in the party?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olegramps Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #13
53. Their only concern is playing to whoever can get them elected.
That is their sole concern. Get elected and suck up the benefits that only the richest of their fellow citizens can afford. If he has to suck off a few of hierarchy, so what when his privileged life style is in jeopardy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
8. Intellectually dishonest whining
Federal money won't be used on abortions. That is current law.

He's just mad that he isn't the anti-choice poster boy by taking away the right of people to spend their own money on insurance that would cover abortions.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
9. He should switch parties
and get it over with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. It would do him (and us) a lot of good. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raging_moderate Donating Member (86 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
11. Stupak is.....
....as Stupak does
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madamesilverspurs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
12. Somebody needs to hand Stupak a calendar,
he apparently thinks we're still living in a time when men owned women.

--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
14. Happy To Hear The Wretch Is Taking It Hard, Sir
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #14
37. Mercy, Honorable Sir!. . That was uncharacteristically pointed!. . .. .n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
16. I know just how he feels. Nancy?,,,, nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
17. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
18. K&R from Michigan in Stupak's district.
Well, actually I'm sitting in Canada while my daughter has piano lessons right now, but ya know...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
19. Good. Now if only his primary challenger can trounce him. That would be sweet!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kber Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
20. Oh fer cripes sake!
Did he really think that by blocking the signature issue by grandstanding on his pet project (which happens to be a major infringement on MY rights, by the way) we were going to do what? Carry him around on our shoulders? Thank him for showing us the error of our ways?

His active supporters in his district have made it clear FOR MONTHS that he was risking their support.

Cry me a river.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
21. Selfish arrogant misogynist
What an ass he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #21
35. "misogynist" is really it..along with
all his other highly undesireable traits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
22. What, no violins for Stupak? Let me provide some...
:nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
23. Go suck on your corporate dickbag and shut up
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
24. "'They're ignoring me,' he says..." No kidding...
you're a fool.

Your position is idiotic, there is no basis for it, except that you wanted your "camera time", you got that, and showed the nation you are a fool.

Now sit sit down and remember, "even a fool can seem wise, if he keeps his mouth closed".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #24
34. And, that's the deepest cut.. we know how stupak
loves his 15 minutes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
25. when a DINO fully expose their true self--it's ugly: are Blanche and Kay Hagan the next ones to
do an interview with NRO?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
26. Now Sludge has linked to the story and twitter has gone haywire.
Edited on Fri Mar-12-10 05:12 PM by jefferson_dem
Also, apparently, Stupak has served up some more totally outlandish bullshit accusations toward the Democratic Leadership, which I won't dignify by posting here.

The dude is cracking up...total bunker mentality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
28. How pathetic!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ashling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
29. sad commentary
Stupak notes that his negotiations with House Democratic leaders in recent days have been revealing. “I really believe that the Democratic leadership is simply unwilling to change its stance,” he says. “Their position says that women, especially those without means available, should have their abortions covered.” The arguments they have made to him in recent deliberations, he adds, “are a pretty sad commentary on the state of the Democratic party.”



Well, Bosco, feel free to leave at any time!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
30. Fuck you, Stupak, you arrogant son of a bitch. You better have another job
lined up after you lose your highly paid position in congress.

mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
31. Abandoning bart stupak? That can't
be bad!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
33. Right..he doesn't cave to sanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #33
38. Imagine that Nancy Pelosi...
listening to all those unions and Democratic voters and stuff like that.

What a tool!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
36. Say 'stupid Stupak' three time fast
I dare you not to spit while you're doing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kber Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #36
43. I got through 2 and a half times
before I cracked up!

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
39. does his primary challenger have her web fundraising site up yet?
I will go to Michigan to help work to unseat this asshole.

I hope anyone who can will also go to Michigan to go door to door and make phone calls from where ever you are to get this man out of office.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. Yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kber Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #41
45. I hadn't seen the crooks and liars blog
Thanks for posting.

If you go to Connie's hub, she's raised about 23K in the past week, compared to 14.5K for Bart for the past year.

I hope she can keep up this pace. She's in for a very tough race and will need whatever resources we can provide.

I am also praying that the UAW endorces her again. When she ran for the statehouse, the UAW gladly threw their weight behind her, but I don't know if the will get involved in the primary.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. Connie has an uphill battle, as all challengers do.
But Stupak is up shit creek and I think he knows it. He's in the process of total self-destruction. How can he expect to make it through a Dem primary after alienating unions and women? Labor has already said they will work against any legislators who obstruct reform. A formal UAW endorsement would be mammoth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cutlassmama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
40. Fucking nutjob. Kennedy was Catholic and I bet he would have voted for HCR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kber Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #40
44. Health Care reform was his passion
He would have voted for it for absolutely certain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
47. Geez, what a pouty, whiny POS...
that pic of him is perfect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neverforget Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
48. Poor Stupak. Betty White has something to say to him:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepBlueC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
49. LEAVE MY ABORTION ALONE!!!
I had to say it. Need a few signs now. I'M MAD AS HELL etc etc. Bastards ain't going to out-gripe me...I am an experienced malcontent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
50. As I've said before, here's a suggestion for Mr. Stupak
If he wants his abortion language he should convince Senate Republicans to allow an up or down vote on the bill that the House initially passed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
51. K & R only because of the Ha Ha.
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olegramps Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
52. Bart Stupid: The Papal Patsy
The brainless twerp doesn't have the balls to think for himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sheepshank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
54. The idea that he is trying to hold the entire bill hostage...
....because of a personal preference? How is that representing his constituents?

Yeah, Stupak should be ignored. He has become increasingly and exceptionally irrelevant as a Political leader that understands and promotes his party's agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
55. I suggest mandatory castration of Stupak.
Hey, he wants to control women's bodies, we should be able to control his.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
56. When you lay down with Blue Dogs, you get fleas.
Not even to mention the C Street thing.

Jeez, what did he expect would happen? Flowers and candy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC