Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The House has to pass the Senate bill, right? And the Senate bill doesn't have the Public Option...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 10:09 PM
Original message
The House has to pass the Senate bill, right? And the Senate bill doesn't have the Public Option...
Edited on Fri Mar-12-10 10:10 PM by jenmito
so how can they get a PO in the final bill? It can't pass through the reconciliation fix because it's not budget-related, so it would have to be OKed by the parliamentarian or get 60 votes, and the Repubs. would most likely do all they could to get the whole THING killed.

I think that's what Rep. Cummings was saying tonight on The Ed Show-he doesn't want to "muddy the waters" and it's going to be hard enough as it is to pass reconciliation WITHOUT it. I worry that it would end up killing the whole thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. The idea is that they pass the public option as a separate bill through reconciliation
Since the public option should be considered budget related.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. You mean THE reconciliation bill? The one they're using to "fix" the Senate bill?
If so, that's what Cummings was saying could muddy the waters and make reconciliation's passage much more difficult.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Yes THE reconciliation bill. The House shouldn't pass a bill until the Senate has passed that. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. But they said that's impossible. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. No, a bunch of Republicans misquoted the parlamentarian when they ran to the cameras. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Kent Conrad said it, too. But he's pretty much a Repub. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Exactly. Don't trust anything that DLCer says. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harkadog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. Except Pelosi agreed with them today at her conference
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. If they raise taxes to pay for it
It's budget related.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. The public option could be included as part of the reconciliation package...
because it could be justified as budget-relevant. Reports have shown how it would help in deficit-reduction over time.

Whatever the case, it doesn't matter because it won't be in the reconciliation package. The House will vote for the Senate Bill. Then we have "reform". Once the reconcilation package is approved of by the Senate (and also the House) we will have the fixes applied to the "reforms" that had just been signed into law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Then why WOULDN'T they do it unless
some Dems. really WERE worried that it wouldn't get the votes? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #9
22. Why wouldn't they?
:shrug: is right! 51 is all they need. If they can't round up 51... :eyes:

All it takes is one Senator to bring it up and they'll be forced to stand and be counted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm not sure that ANYONE knows for certain ....
Edited on Fri Mar-12-10 10:18 PM by Clio the Leo
.... except Larry O'Donnell who, of course, knows more than we mere plebes (huh.)

But Bernie apparently thinks it can be included. I guess the theory is to TRY it, the GOP is gonna try to stop it anyway (the thought of which reminds me of that awful moment last December when he offered his single-payer amendment) and we'll see what happens.

What *I* think the problem is ... there are hold outs in both chambers who dont want the PO, enough of whom could potentially derail the whole bill. I dont see the sense in losing the WHOLE bill when we're THIS close to passing the bill when the PO could be added later. If we dont pass the bill, we cant add the PO to anything.

And to the first person who chimes in that "they'll never add it later, they cant be trusted, blah blah blah" then let me point out if we had WORKED as hard to get the PO in the bill as the teabaggers did to kill it, we wouldn't be worrying about this now. So zip it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. I agree with you
100%. And yeah-Lawrence O'Donnell is still REALLY getting on my nerves with his negativity. This morning he said he doesn't think any bill will pass-PO or NO PO. :eyes:

I, too, think they should add it later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. This morning was an eye opener....
Edited on Fri Mar-12-10 10:41 PM by Clio the Leo
... literally, because I woke up to him on Morning Joe complaining about the bill and "the taxes."

And the truth comes out ..... Larry is a libertarian.

I have no patience for libertarians, I do not waste my time on them.

Prayers for Keith that his father's health improves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Same here!
I woke up to him being his same negative self and it just made me roll my eyes, and since I was reading his words with the tv on mute, I missed a couple words. :D I wonder what he's going to say once it passes.

Keith said last night that his father's health is improving at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. ALL this time I had been wondering why he was the ONLY one ....
.... who kept swearing (since LAST FALL) that this "couldn't be done via reconciliation."

I gave him the benefit of the doubt. He certainly knows more about how the Senate works than I do.

But does he know more than Harry Reid, Joe Biden and Barack Obama do?

Turns out Larry has been saying it "cant" because he doesn't WANT it to.

He's a bill killer ..... pure and simple.

The bill killers stopped being cool about three weeks ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Exactly...
He's a bill killer. And whenever he interviews ANYONE about the status/progress of the bill, he doesn't accept any positive news. He just goes on and on about different scenarios that could kill it, and when they tell him it can't happen that way, it's as if he can't accept that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. "I know this because once back in 1993 Tip O'Neal couldn't get it done..."
Edited on Fri Mar-12-10 11:30 PM by Clio the Leo
"and I know this because I helped him!"

Larry O'Donnel! You GET no lower premiums! Yours will continue to skyrocket even after the bill is signed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SandWalker1984 Donating Member (533 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. You honestly think this corporate boot licking Senate bunch will pass a reconciliation bill?
Really? After they took such pains to make the corporate health care lobbyists happy?

It's time for some honesty.


If the Senate bill passes the House, we will be stuck with that piece of corporate butt kissing, mandated profits, poor excuse for health care reform. It won't get "fixed." It won't get amended. It's all a pretty show for real Democrats so we think the DLC hasn't taken over our party. We will be stuck with expensive insurance that covers little, fines or, if you dare defy them...prison.


They'll have a nice little staged signing of the bill by the president, then move on to their next item on the agenda........
biometric ID cards slipped into immigration law.


Some people that post here really should go read Orwell's book 1984.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. They have to. The House won't pass their bill until the Senate passes the fixes.
Edited on Fri Mar-12-10 10:24 PM by w4rma
The Republicans were lying about the parliamentarian's answer.

Noone trusts the Senators. Not even the House members.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. It was reported on MSNBC today that the Senate will send a letter to the House signed
by at least 51 Senators saying they WILL pass the fixes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #16
29. Have we seen the exact bill that constitutes the fixes?
I don't seem to recall having a chance to read it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
24. Not so fast.
Edited on Fri Mar-12-10 11:10 PM by jefferson_dem
There's some confusion about exactly what the Parliamentarian said but the "House first" scenario was not batted down by several Dems I saw interviewed today. So, it will have to be done that way if it's done at all.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. Yes, they WILL pass a reconciliation bill. But it won't have a PO.
Some people should take off their tinfoil hats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. We have 51 verified votes for it in the Senate. It can pass. And if Dems want to win in November
then they need it to pass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. I know. And if the Senate gives a signed letter to the House saying they WILL pass it,
I think the House will go first, allowing Obama to go to Indonesia/etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smalll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
27. Yes. It's all about the House. We know the endgame. As even the Senate parliamentarian just said
-- first, the House must pass the Senate bill, and the President must (and even forget the must, he will) sign it -- in his long-thirsted-for Rose Garden Ceremony.

At that point, the pressure will drain, the drama will die -- "That's All Folks" will be the result.

-- Reconcilliation, shmillconciliation.

Am I right? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. "the reconciliation bill could be written in a way that would not require Obama to sign the Senate"
Edited on Fri Mar-12-10 11:43 PM by w4rma
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 02:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC