Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can I get an "Amen" for Gary Hart?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 07:18 PM
Original message
Can I get an "Amen" for Gary Hart?
From his blog:

Did you ever wish you could manage your life one problem at a time? It might make the many tough decisions we all face actually managable. But, you say, life doesn't work that way.

Well, if it doesn't work that way for you and me, why in the world would we think it worked for the president of the United States? But, apparently that is how the supposedly sophisticated pundits and most of the president's critics think he should manage the business of the nation. "He should deal with jobs first," they chatter, "then he can do health care," they opine, "then he can do energy, then education, and then..." on and on and on.

*****

The largest, most complex, most widely-dispersed nation in human history doesn't exactly run itself. It requires multi-tasking management on a scale few humans can contemplate. To President Obama's media and opposition critics it must be said: Grow up and understand what being president of the United States means at this stage in our history. Quit making ridiculous and childish demands for the president to do one thing at a time.

Life doesn't work that way and intelligent, mature, and thoughtful people know that. And be grateful we have a president who can do more than one thing at a time.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gary-hart/one-thing-at-a-time_b_499158.html">One Thing At A Time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Most of the corporatemediawhores
Edited on Mon Mar-15-10 07:22 PM by Cha
tried their best to not have Obama elected so they aren't ones to judge with any impartiality.

Amen Gary Hart!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. The rest of us must do that in our everyday lives. The problems the President faces are way more
complex then that but by making it seem so hard to get a handle on, it becomes the impossible. And it is not impossible for Obama to do more then one thing at a time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. Amen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. Gary Hart - cheated on his wife.
Clearly immoral, should be disenfranchised from the democratic party, and obliterated from the face of the earth...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_Hart
1988 presidential campaign and the Donna Rice affair

Rumors began circulating nearly immediately that Hart was having an extramarital affair. In an interview that appeared in the New York Times on May 3, 1987, Hart responded to the rumors by daring the press corps: "Follow me around. I don't care. I'm serious. If anybody wants to put a tail on me, go ahead. They'll be very bored."<9> The Miami Herald had been investigating Hart's alleged womanizing for weeks before the "dare" appeared in the New York Times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Donna Rice was a Repuke plant
Not that I excuse Gary Hart for being stupid enough to fall for it, but I suspected that was a setup all along. And when Donna Rice came back a few years later as a "Christian anti-porn crusader" that was all the confirmation I needed. If Hart had been elected in 88, we never would have had Poppy Bush as President, let alone his imbecile Chimp son. (Unless you count the fact that Poppy was more than likely the one actually in charge from 1981-89)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. You're kidding me, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Nope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. I tend to look for websites that are a little more....
Edited on Mon Mar-15-10 08:07 PM by cornermouse
substantial... sources than those named congressionalbadboys. Sorry. No sale.

He cheated. The democratic party is only tolerating those who pass a purity test. FDR, JFK, MLK, and Teddy would all fail to pass the test along with Gary. You gotta be consistent if you're going to establish rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. You're joking I hope
Nobody else has been disenfranchised from the Democratic Party for cheating on their wife.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Oh really?
Another kidder.

:spray: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. Clinton? Spitzer?
Gavin Newsom? Villaraigosa?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. Remember what was said about both Bill and Chelsea on DU
when Hillary was running for president? Did you think we'd forget? The same thing with Spitzer. I don't know what Newsom did but Villaraigosa was apparently about corruption instead of sex, so he's still eligible. Now if he'd had an affair....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. uhm he had an affair with some TV news person
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. Is Gary Hart's wife running for President?
I don't get your point.

And you're still carrying a grudge over the primaries? Really?? Because I don't think Bill & Hil are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. rofl
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Gary Hart was the start of this "new morality"
Until Gary Hart's affair, the media ignored marital infidelities. Ever since, it's been open season on politicians' love lives.

Now you may think this is a good thing until you realize that politicians have ALWAYS had affairs - since time immemorial. It's in their DNA. It's what they are, like it or not.

The problem is, it's FAR TOO LATE to be equating "morality" with "infidelity". Presidents and other leaders have been having affairs since Ancient Egypt.

Since when has it been a barometer of their leadership skills?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. As far as I"m concerned it isn't.
Edited on Mon Mar-15-10 08:09 PM by cornermouse
I don't care if they have naked women running through the bedroom every 3 minutes as long as they implement policies that benefit "we, the people".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Did Gary Hart let you down?
Say, wasn't he the co-author of the famous "US Commission on National Security/21st Century" report that was roundly ignored by Bush?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hart-Rudman_Task_Force_on_Homeland_Security

Funny, I don't remember a single mention of his affair in that report.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. In the interest of clarification, let's try this again.
You say "The problem is, it's FAR TOO LATE to be equating "morality" with "infidelity". Presidents and other leaders have been having affairs since Ancient Egypt. Since when has it been a barometer of their leadership skills?"

I say "As far as I"m concerned it isn't (a barometer of their leadership skills). I don't care if they have naked women running through the bedroom every 3 minutes as long as they implement policies that benefit "we, the people"."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. Uh...WTF?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. Name calling?
Isn't there something about that in the rules?...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 06:58 AM
Response to Reply #27
32. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
22. Hart also had many accomplishments
and his wife is still with him. Not to mention, he did not lie about it, then deny his own child for nearly 2 years, and he did not misuse funds from a poverty center. It was also not a long term affair and his wife was not dealing with incurable cancer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. Oh that makes it so-o-o-o-o much better.
By the way, do you remember all those DU attacks on Elizabeth? It seems incurable cancer only matters when it becomes an advantage in a disagreement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 07:23 AM
Response to Reply #26
33. I remember that Elizabeth was used as the attack dog of the Edwards campaign
attacking the Clintons and Obamas. The worst was telling a crowd in Iowa on the eve of the caucuses that Obama's healthcare plan would not cover her because cancer was a pre-existing condition - a blatant lie and this was in her prepared comments. What of her speaking of her better choices that made her happier than Hillary? (Distorting the fact that with her oldest kids, she made the same decision as Hillary (to work - and there is NOTHING wrong with that decision.) During the campaign, the Edwards supporters here used her cancer as a shield - saying, in essence, she could attack or lie all she wanted, but no one could counter it ... because she had cancer.

The next point that she was attacked was when Edwards "confessed" and her Daily Kos post spoke of her knowing in 2006. Then she was stunned that people responded directly to that post questioning why she let JRE run with this landmine there. Then, that criticism was mixed with intense sympathy for all she had to deal with, but this was an election for President. It was not so much attacks but questioning how they could have risked McCain winning.

I do remember attacks when her second book came out - and those based on things she said and did. I don't see you arguing that anyone else should not be criticized for anything they said or did.

I do think that the Elizabeth Edwards stories in both Game Change and Young's book, only some of which had backup, were reported as written and most people defended her here - even as they admitted that there was likely some truth there.

At this point, between those books and Hunter's comments, I think that Elizabeth Edwards has been treated very unfairly and I suspect that many here will agree, but that does not make her a saint. What she did in the campaign still happened. Life has been very unfair to her - and for that she deserves sympathy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
30. What a damned fool
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #4
34. Obliterated, you say?
Sanctimonious much?

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. When I see double standards, I say it.
That is the real meaning of being fair and even handed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #35
37. Obliterated?
What other Democrats have been "obliterated" for a similar offense? And since Hart has not held elected office for more than twenty years, in what sense has he not already been obliterated?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PVnRT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #4
36. That's idiotic
I thought us liberals were the "purity police."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #36
38. Apparently we're a "Big Tent" now...(nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PVnRT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. "Big Tent" - like Hart had on his boat?
OH SNAP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. Wow...A twenty-two year old current events joke!
You must be working for Jay Leno....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PVnRT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. I have some bully material about flappers and that Charleston dance, too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damonm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
43. Must be nice...
to be pure, without sin or error, and casting the first stone.

I wouldn't have the slightest idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
46. He fhould have ftonef lain upon hif cheft until he if deceafed.
Save it for the witch burning, Cotton Mather.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. Rec'd and AMEN! Thanks! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
14. 'Volunteered for Gary Hart against Mondale. Liked him then.
Like him now.

He is an expansive and interesting mind.

Also he holds a high degree in divinity. I would pay a large sum to hear Gary Hart debate "social issues" with Franklin Graham or Jim Dobson or some other far right theocrat.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
15. Dammit to hell, I'm giving a second 'Amen' for Gary Hart, and anybody
don't like it they can stick their wiener on a waffle iron.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. Ribbed for her pleasure. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #15
40. Can an get an "Ouch" for Saltpoint?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #40
45. Hey Jeff! Howdy.
Do what you can to keep that cretinous fool Tommy Thompson out of the Wisconsin Senate race.

I'm rootin' for Russ!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ron Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
29. Despite the pissing-on that this thread has unfortunately suffered,
I'll give an "Amen."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
31. Amen!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
39. Monkey Business. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistler162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
47. Good Senator good possible Presidential candidate
but one DUMB F*** to double daring the press to follow him around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC